Advertisement

Journal of Computational Neuroscience

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 21–38 | Cite as

Increased Computational Accuracy in Multi-Compartmental Cable Models by a Novel Approach for Precise Point Process Localization

  • A. E. Lindsay
  • K. A. Lindsay
  • J. R. RosenbergEmail author
Article

Abstract

Compartmental models of dendrites are the most widely used tool for investigating their electrical behaviour. Traditional models assign a single potential to a compartment. This potential is associated with the membrane potential at the centre of the segment represented by the compartment. All input to that segment, independent of its location on the segment, is assumed to act at the centre of the segment with the potential of the compartment. By contrast, the compartmental model introduced in this article assigns a potential to each end of a segment, and takes into account the location of input to a segment on the model solution by partitioning the effect of this input between the axial currents at the proximal and distal boundaries of segments. For a given neuron, the new and traditional approaches to compartmental modelling use the same number of locations at which the membrane potential is to be determined, and lead to ordinary differential equations that are structurally identical. However, the solution achieved by the new approach gives an order of magnitude better accuracy and precision than that achieved by the latter in the presence of point process input.

Keywords

compartmental models dendrites cable equation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bower JM, Beeman D (1997) The Book of GENESIS, 2nd edition. NY Telos.Google Scholar
  2. Hines M, Carnevale N (1997) The NEURON simulation environmment. Neural Computation 9: 1179–1209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. Journal of Physiology 117: 500–544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lindsay KA, Rosenberg JR, Tucker G (2003). Analytical and numerical construction of equivalent cables. Mathematical Biosciences 184: 137–164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Oram MW, Wiener MC, Lestienne R, Richmond BJ (1999) Stochastic nature/vadjust of precisely timed spike patterns in visual system neuronal responses. Journal of Neurophysiology 81: 3021–3033.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Poriazi P, Brannon T, Mel BW (2003) Pyramidal neuron as two-layer neural network. Neuron 37: 989–999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rall W (1964) Theoretical significance of dendritic trees and motoneuron input-output relations. In: RF Reiss, ed. Neural Theory and Modelling. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.Google Scholar
  8. Segev I, Burke RE (1998) Compartmental models of complex neurons. In: C Koch and I Segev eds. Methods in Neuronal Modeling—from Ions to Networks, 2nd ed. MIT Press, MA, Ch.3, pp.93–136.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. E. Lindsay
    • 1
  • K. A. Lindsay
    • 2
  • J. R. Rosenberg
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburgh
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of GlasgowGlasgow
  3. 3.Division of Neuroscience and Biomedical SystemsUniversity of GlasgowGlasgow

Personalised recommendations