Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Basic Family Relationships: Portuguese Validation of the “Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas” (CERFB)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinical intervention with families benefits from the accurate evaluation of family dynamics, requiring the development of assessment instruments that allow for a systematic data collection and comprehension of family relations. The present study aimed to examine psychometric properties – factor structure, reliability and convergent and divergent validity – of the Portuguese Version of the “Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas” (CERFB – Basic Family Relations Questionnaire), using two non-clinical convenience samples with adult couples, having at least one biological child in common (older than 11 years old) living with them. Sample 1 included 150 participants (75 couples, analysed independently), aged between 31 and 61 years-old; sample 2 comprised 228 participants (114 couples, analysed independently), aged between 30 and 73 years-old. An Exploratory Factor Analysis was conducted with sample 1, replicating the factor structure of the original version of the CERFB (two factors – marital and parental). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted with sample 2, confirming the hypothesized model supported by good fit indexes. Results regarding reliability (assessed through Cronbach’s Alpha) and convergent and divergent validity (using the Portuguese versions of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the Parental Stress Scale) indicate the appropriateness of CERFB in Portuguese context as a useful measure to simultaneously assess marital and parental dimensions of family functioning.

Highlights

  • Clinical intervention with families benefits from the accurate evaluation of family dynamics.

  • Portuguese Version of the “Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas” replicated the factor structure of the original version of the questionnaire, assessed by EFA and CFA.

  • Reliability and convergent and divergent validity indicate the appropriateness of CERFB in Portuguese context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alarcão, M. (2006). (Des)Equilíbrios Familiares. Quarteto.

  • Algarvio, S., & Leal, I. P. (2004). Preocupações parentais: validação de um instrumento de medida. Psicologia Saúde & Doenças, 5(2), 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brites, R., & Nunes, O. (2010). Uma nova escala de auto-eficácia parental: estudos sobre validação. Actas do VII Simpósio Nacional de Investigação em Psicologia. Universidade do Minho, Braga. (pp. 553–567).

  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Erlbaum.

  • Campreciós, M., Vilaregut, A., Callea, A., & Mercadal, L. (2020). Aplicabilidad clínica del Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas (CERFB) en los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria: relación conyugal y parental en estructuras tradicionales de familia. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 48(5), 191–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campreciós, M., Vilaregut, A., Virgili, C., Mercadal, L., & Ibáñez, N. (2014). Relaciones familiares básicas en familias con un hijo con trastorno de la conducta alimentaria. Anuario de Psicología, 44, 311–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, B., Veríssimo, M., Santos, A. J., Fernandes, C., & Cardoso, J. P. (2011). Escala de Sentimento de Competência Parental: Análise confirmatória do modelo de medida numa amostra de pais portugueses. Laboratório de Psicologia, 9, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.14417/lp.630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, I., Stanton, M., & Goldenberg, H. (2017). Family Therapy: An Overview (9th Ed.). Cengage Learning.

  • Gomez, R., & Leal, I. (2008). Ajustamento conjugal: Características psicométricas da versão portuguesa da Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Análise Psicológica, 26(4), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granic, I., & Hollenstein, T. P. (2003). Dynamic systems methods for models of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 15(3), 641–669. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579403000324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, P., Reijneveld, S. A., Brugman, E., Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P., & Verhulst, F. C. (2002). Family factors and life events as risk factors for behavioural and emotional problems in children. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 11, 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-002-0277-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, E. K., Sasaki, T., & Hazen, N. L. (2013). Smooth versus rocky transitions to parenthood: family systems in developmental context. Family Relations, 62, 824–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez, N., Linares, J. L., Vilaregut, A., Virgili, C., & Campreciós, M. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas (CERFB). Psicothema, 24, 489–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.5 for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.

  • Leal, I., & Maroco, J. (2010). Escala de Stress Parental. In Mixão, M. L., Leal, I., & Maroco, J., Avaliação em sexualidade e parentalidade (pp. 199–210). Livpsic.

  • Linares, J. L (1996). Identidad y narrativa. La terapia familiar en la práctica clínica. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós Terapia Familiar.

  • Linares, J. L. (2001). Does history end with postmodernism? Towards an ultramodern family therapy. Family Process, 4, 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2001.4040100401.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linares, J. L. (2002). Del abuso y otros desmanes. El maltrato familiar, entre la terapia y el control. Paidós.

  • Linares, J. L. (2006). Complex love as relational nurturing: an integrating ultramodern concept. Family Process, 45, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00083.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linares, J. L., & Vallarino, D. (2008). Schizophrenia and eco-resilience. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 27(3), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2008.27.3.16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linares, J.L. (2012). Terapia familiar ultramoderna. La inteligencia terapéutica. Herder.

  • Mazza, M., Di Nicola, M., Catalano, V., Callea, A., Martinotti, G., Harnic, D., Bruschi, A., Battaglia, C., & Janiri, L. (2012). Description and validation of a questionnaire for the detection of meteoropathy and meteorosensitivity: the METEO-Q. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53, 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Narciso, I., & Costa, M. E. (1996). Amores satisfeitos, mas não perfeitos. Cadernos de Consulta Psicológica, 12, 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoal, P. M., Oliveira, L. B., & Raposo, C. F. (2015). Evidence for the validity of the Global Measure of Relationship Satisfaction (GMREL) in three Portuguese samples. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, M. S., Mayorga, C. C., & Szapocznik, J. (2003). The ecosystemic “lens” to understanding family functioning. In T. L. Sexton, G. R. Weeks, & M. S. Robbins (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy: The science and practice of working with families and couples (p. 21–36). Brunner-Routledge.

  • Roca, M., Vilaregut, A., Palma, C., Barón, F. J., Campreciós, M., & Mercadal, L. (2020). Basic family relations, parental bonding, and dyadic adjustment in families with a member with psychosis. Community Mental Health Journal, 56(7), 1262–1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-020-00581-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vilaregut, A., Callea, A., Campreciós, M., Coletti, M., Mercadal, L., & Mateu, C. (2019). Measuring family relations: Italian Validation of the “Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas” (CERFB). Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 16(2), 116–123.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research leading to these results received funding from Fundació Blanquerna under Grant Agreement No 2014-URL-Trac-012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. S. Lima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the included studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lima, V.S., Dias, P., Vilaregut, A. et al. Assessment of Basic Family Relationships: Portuguese Validation of the “Cuestionario de Evaluación de las Relaciones Familiares Básicas” (CERFB). J Child Fam Stud 31, 1656–1663 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02215-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02215-8

Keywords

Navigation