Advertisement

Short Form Version of the Father and Mother Attachment Questionnaire (FMAQ)

  • Filipa Nunes
  • Catarina P. Mota
  • Mónica Costa
  • Raquel S. Assunção
  • Paula M. MatosEmail author
Original Paper
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

The Father and Mother Attachment Questionnaire (FMAQ) is a 30-item self-report measure developed for assessing adolescents’ and young adults’ representations of attachment relationships with each parental figure separately, across three dimensions: quality of emotional bond, separation anxiety, and inhibition of exploration and individuality. Five studies were conducted to develop a short-form of FMAQ and to examine whether this new short measure presented with fit psychometric properties.

Method

Study 1 involved Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses with 563 Portuguese adolescents and aim to select the best items to include in the short-form of the FMAQ. Studies 2 to 5 aimed to replicate the reliability and factor structure found in Study 1 through confirmatory factor analysis on independent samples of adolescents, young adults and adults.

Results

The IRT results suggested including 15-items in the short-form of FMAQ. The results provide support for the adjustment of the short factor structure, internal consistency, and invariance measurement (among gender of participants and parental roles), and predictive validity across different samples.

Conclusions

The results obtained in the five studies indicate that the short-form FMAQ is a reliable instrument to assess the quality of attachment to parents in adolescence and emerging adulthood, as well as to evaluate adults’ perceptions of their parents as attachment figures during their adolescence. Thus, we suggest this short-form as a promising research tool for researchers quickly to assess attachment to parents in these ages taking into account a three-dimensional approach.

Keywords

Parental attachment Self-report measure Construct validity Measurement invariance Youth 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the researchers Fátima Silva, Tatiana Ferreira and Patrícia da Costa Claro from the University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, for kindly making their databases available for this study. This work was funded by the Portuguese Science Foundation (CPUP UID/PSI/00050/2013; FEDER/COMPETE2020 POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007294) and a PhD scholarship (SFRH/BD/133032/2017).

Author Contributions

F.N. conceptualized and designed the study, carried out the analyses and drafted the manuscript; C.P.M. conceptualized and designed the study and reviewed the manuscript for clarity; M.C. contributed to carry out the analyses and the discussion of the results; R.S.A. contributed to carry out the analyses; P.M.M. conceptualized and designed the study, wrote parts of the manuscript, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study is in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences at the University of Porto (REFª2017/12-11) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10826_2019_1672_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Supplementary Information

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44(4), 709–716.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.4.709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: relationships to wellbeing in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(5), 427–454.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02202939.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Assunção, R. S., Costa, P., Tagliabue, S., & Matos, P. M. (2017). Problematic facebook use in adolescents: associations with parental attachment and alienation to peers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(11), 2990–2998.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer, R., Smith, G., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. 2nd edn. United States of America: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.Google Scholar
  6. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.226.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Blomgren, A., Svahn, K., Åström, E., & Rönnlund, M. (2016). Coping strategies in late adolescence: relationships to parental attachment and time perspective. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 177(3), 85–96.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2016.1178101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: parent-child attachment and healthy human development. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Brenning, K., Soenens, B., & Braet, C. (2017). Testing the incremental value of a separate measure for secure attachment relative to a measure for attachment anxiety and avoidance a study in middle childhood and early adolescence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 3(1), 5–13.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buist, K. L., Reitz, E., & Dekovic, M. (2008). Attachment stability and change during adolescence: a longitudinal application of the social relations model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(3), 429–444.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407508090867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabral, J., & Matos, P. M. (2010). COPE inventory—teste da estrutura factorial com uma amostra de jovens adultos [COPE inventory—factor structure test with a sample of young adults]. Psicologia, XXIV(1), 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cabral, J., Matos, P. M., Beyers, W., & Soenens, B. (2012). Attachment, emotion regulation and coping in Portuguese emerging adults: a test of a mediation hypothesis. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 1000–1012.  https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n3.39391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Canavarro, M. (1999). Inventário de sintomas psicopatológicos—BSI. In M. Gonçalves, L. Almeida & M. Simões (Eds.), Testes e provas psicológicas em Portugal (volume II). Braga: APPORT.Google Scholar
  14. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2012). A direct comparison approach for testing measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 167–198.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428111421987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coutinho, J., Ribeiro, E., Ferreirinha, R., & Dias, P. (2009). Versão Portuguesa da escala de dificuldades de regulação emocional e sua relação com sintomas psicopatológicos [Portuguese version of the emotional regulation difficulties scale and its relation with psychopathological symptoms]. Revista de Psiquiatria Clinica, 37(4), 145–151.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832010000400001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Derogatis, L. R. (1975). Brief symptom inventory (BSI). Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research.Google Scholar
  18. Ferreira, M., & Costa, M. E. (1998). Inventory of peer and parental attachment. Adaptação do instrumento [Inventory of peer and parental attachment. Adaptation of the instrument]. Unpublished work. Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences at the of University of Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  19. Fraley, R. C., & Waller, N. G. (1998). Adult attachment patterns: a test of the typological model. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 77–114). New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ginevra, M. C., Sgaramella, T. M., Ferrari, L., Nota, L., Santilli, S., & Soresi, S. (2016). Visions about future: a new scale assessing optimism, pessimism, and hope in adolescents. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 17(2), 187–210.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-016-9324-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gonçalves, B., & Fagulha, T. (2004). The Portuguese version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(4), 339–348.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.20.4.339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gouveia, T., & Matos, P. M. (2013). Manual QVPM —Questionário de Vinculação ao Pai e à Mãe [The father and mother attachment questionnaire—manual]. Porto: Eudito. https://sites.google.com/site/manualqvpm/home.
  23. Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoffman, J. A. (1984). Psychological separation of late adolescents from their parents. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th edn. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Marsh, H. W. (1988). The Self-Description Questionnaire (SDQ) III. A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of the late adolescent self-concept: an interim test manual and research monograph. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  28. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(2), 181–220.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Massé, R., Poulin, C., Dassa, C., Lambert, J., Bélair, S., & Battaglini, M. A. (1998). Élaboration et validation d’un outil de mesure du bien-être psychologique: L’ÉMMBEP. Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique, 89(5), 352–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Matos, P. M. (2002). (Des)continuidades na vinculação aos pais e ao par amoroso em adolescentes [Discontinuities in attachment to parents and romantic partners in adolescents]. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences; University of Porto.Google Scholar
  31. Matos, P. M., & Costa, M. E. (2001). Questionário de Vinculação ao Pai e à Mãe (QVPM): Versão revista [Father and Mother Attachment Questionnaire (FMAQ): revised version]. Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences at the University of Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  32. Monteiro, S., Tavares, J., & Pereira, A. (2012). Adaptação portuguesa da escala de medida de manifestação de bem-estar psicológico com estudantes universitários—EMMBEP [Portuguese adaptation of the scale of measure of manifestation of psychological well-being with university students—EMWB]. Psicologia Saúde & Doenças, 13(1), 66–77 .Google Scholar
  33. Moura, O., Spill, R., & Matos, P. M. (2010). The Father/Mother Attachment Questionnaire (FMAQ): Factor structure invariance across Portuguese and German adolescents. Milan, Italy: 5th Congress of the European Society on Family Relations.Google Scholar
  34. Nunes, F., Matos, P. M., & Mota, C. P. (2018). Perspetivas sobre o futuro: Tradução e adaptação para a população portuguesa [Visions about future. Translation and adaptation into Portuguese]. Unpublished manuscript. Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences at the University of Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  35. Nunes, F., & Mota, C. P. (2017). Parenting styles and suicidal ideation in adolescents: mediating effect of attachment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(3), 734–747.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0611-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paek, I., & Han, K. T. (2013). IRTPRO 2.1 for Windows (Item response theory for patient-reported outcomes). Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(3), 242–252.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621612468223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paredes, A. C., Ferreira, G., & Pereira, M. G. (2014). Attachment to parents: the mediating role of inhibition of exploration and individuality on health behaviors. Families, Systems and Health, 32(1), 43–52.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035365.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Radloff, L. S. (1977). A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rice, K. G., FitzGerald, D. P., Whaley, T. J., & Gibbs, C. L. (1995). Cross-sectional and longitudinal examination of attachment, separation-individuation, and college student adjustment. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruhl, H., Dolan, E. A., & Buhrmester, D. (2015). Adolescent attachment trajectories with mothers and fathers: the importance of parent-child relationship experiences and gender. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(3), 427–442.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Santiago, J. C., Bucher-Maluschke, J. S., Alexandre, I. F., & Branco, F. (2017). Attachment to peers and perception of attachment to parents in adults. Psychology, 08(06), 862–877.  https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.86056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shaver, P. R., Belsky, J., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). The adult attachment interview and sel-reports of romantic attachment: associations across domains and methods. Personal Relationships, 7(1), 25–43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00002.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111.  https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.12.1.102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Tagliabue, S., & Lanz, M. (2014). Exploring social and personal relationships: the issue of measurement invariance of non-independent observations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 683–690.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Taylor, T. A., Medvedev, O. N., Owens, R. G., & Siegert, R. J. (2017). Development and validation of the State Contentment Measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 152–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Toland, M. D. (2014). Practical guide to conducting an item response theory analysis. Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(1), 120–151.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613511332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson, J. M., & Wilkinson, R. B. (2012). The self-report assessment of adolescent attachment: a systematic review and critique. Journal of Relationships Research, 3, 81–94.  https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2012.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology and Education SciencesUniversity of Porto. R. Alfredo AllenPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Center for PsychologyUniversity of Porto. R. Alfredo AllenPortoPortugal
  3. 3.University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro—UTAD, Edifício da Escola de Ciências Humanas e Sociais—Polo I. Quinta dos Prados—UTADVila RealPortugal

Personalised recommendations