Relationship Between Forms of Aggression and Social Status in South Korean Primary School Peer Groups
- 10 Downloads
This research aimed to explore the relationship between aggression and social status. More specifically, we differentiated between relational aggression and overt aggression, and between perceived popularity and social preference. We also considered classroom structure (i.e., density, hierarchy) a moderator in the relationship between aggression and social status.
A total of 1,404 students (719 boys, 685 girls; 3rd to 6th graders) from 71 classrooms in primary schools of South Korea participated and responded via online surveys that included peer nomination of aggression and social status subtypes.
Multi-level analyses revealed that the negative association between relational aggression and later perceived popularity was stronger in classrooms with low density compared to ones with high density. Overt aggression enhanced social preference in hierarchical classrooms whereas it has negative association with later social preference in egalitarian classrooms.
The results suggest that classroom structures play a significant role in reinforcing social status via specific forms of aggression. Classroom context plays a key role in this connection, as students choose their specific forms of aggression in accordance with their goals. Limitations of the study and directions for future research were suggested.
KeywordsSocial network analysis Density Hierarchy Aggression Social status
This paper was supported by Konkuk University in 2015.
J.H. designed and executed the study and the writing and editing of the manuscript. J.K. collected the data and did the data analyses and editing of the manuscript.
Konkuk University, Republic of Korea.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Konkuk University and/or national research committee and with APA ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta‐analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Rodkin, P. (2007). Aggression and adaptation: the bright side to bad behavior. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
- Lansford, J. E., Malone, P. S., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (2010). Developmental cascades of peer rejection, social information processing biases, and aggression during middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579410000301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. Seventh edition Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén. 2012.Google Scholar
- Rodkin, P. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Child and adolescent peer relations in educational context. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, M. Zeidner, (eds.) APA educational psychology handbook: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors. Vol. 210.1037/13274-015. Washington: DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Rodkin, P. C. (2004). Peer ecologies of aggression and bullying. In D. L. Espelage, E. W. Gutgsell & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: a social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 87–106). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Bowker, J. (2015). Children in peer groups. In M. Bornstein & T. Leventhal (Volume Eds.) and R. M. Lerner (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Vol. 4: Ecological settings and processes, 7th Edn., (pp.175–222). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Schafer, M., Korn, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Wolke, D., & Schulz, H. (2005). Bullying roles in changing contexts: the stability of victim and bully roles from primary to secondary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(4), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250544000107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vermande, M. M., Gilholm, P. A., Reijntjes, A. H., Hessen, D. J., Sterck, E. H., & Overduin-de Vries, A. M. (2018). Is inspiring group members an effective predictor of social dominance in early adolescence? Direct and moderated effects of behavioral strategies, social skills, and gender on resource control and popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(9), 1813–1829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0830-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wellness, B. (1988). Structural analysis: from method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellness & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: a network approach (pp. 19–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar