Patterns of Parental Interactions After Divorce and Individual Well-Being
- 56 Downloads
This study sought to uncover patterns of parental interactions following divorce using multiple empirically-supported indicators related to cooperation, overt conflict, and covert conflict and to link patterns of parental interactions with indicators of adult well-being including stress, life satisfaction, alcohol use, and risk drinking.
Using community-based sampling and latent profile analysis, patterns of parental interactions were identified and associations among such patterns and parental well-being were examined for recently divorced parents (N= 246). Reports of parental interactions included parents’ perceptions of their own and their former spouse’s cooperation and covert conflict behaviors, as well as perceptions of overt conflict behaviors in parental interactions.
Two patterns of parental interactions were identified (Congruent and Divergent). Among the full sample, neither pattern was linked with any indicator of well-being. Examining these associations separately for mothers and fathers, fathers in the Divergent group reported higher levels of alcohol use than those in the Congruent group (χ2 = 4.64, p = .03). Mothers in the Divergent group reported marginally higher levels of life satisfaction than those in the Congruent group.
Utilizing a person-centered approach to uncover patterns of parental interactions yielded groups that differentiated largely on the basis of participant’s perceptions of their former spouses’ behaviors. Future research might consider the impact of perception as a component of divorce education evaluation work.
KeywordsCooperation Conflict Divorce Gender Latent profile analysis
A.J.F. assisted in the collection of data, conducted analyses, and contributed in writing all parts of the manuscript. R.E.P. assisted in the collection of data, contributed in writing all parts of the manuscript, and edited the manuscript. K.P. assisted in the collection of data, contributed in writing the literature review and discussion, and edited the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of Iinterest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the Florida State University Institutional Review Board. Informed Consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Adamsons, K., & Pasley, K. (2006). Coparenting following divorce and relationship dissolution. In M. A. Fine & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), The handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution (pp. 241–261). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ahrons, C. R. (1994). The good divorce: Keeping your family together when your marriage comes apart. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2013). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: A 3-step approach using Mplus. Mplus Web Notes: No. 15. http://statmodel.com/examples/webnote.shtml.
- Braver, S. L., & O’Connell, E. (1998). Divorced dads: Shattering the myths. New York, NY: Tarcher/Putnam.Google Scholar
- Dawson, D. A. (2003). Methodological issues in measuring alcohol use. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/arh27-1/18-29.htm
- Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. 3rd ed Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Emery, R. E. (2012). Renegotiating family relationships. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Ferraro, A. J., Lucier-Greer, M., Oehme, K., & Dalton, H. (2018). Reconsidering physical custody: Examining measurement equivalence across dimensions of post-divorce co-parenting. Family Science Review, 22(4), 91–117.Google Scholar
- Hetherington, E. M., & Kelly, J. (2003). For better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. 8th ed Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (2015). Beyond hangovers: Understanding alcohol’s impact on your health (NIH Publication No. 15–7604). https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/Hangovers/beyondHangovers.pdf
- Pearlin, L. I., & Bierman, A. (2013). Current issues and future directions in research into the stress process. In C. S. Aneshensel, J. C. Phelan, A. Bierman, (eds.) Handbook of the sociology of mental health. 2nd edn. (pp. 325–340). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
- Pearlin, L. I., & Pioli, M. F. (2003). Personal control: Some conceptual turf and future directions. In S. H. Zariff, L. I. Pearlin, & K. W. Schaie (Eds.) Personal control in social and life course contexts. (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (2014). Global status report on alcohol and health 2014. http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/global_alcohol_report/msb_gsr_2014_1.pdf?ua=1
- Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. In M. E. Sobel & M. P. Becker (eds.), Sociological Methodology 2000 (pp. 165–200). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar