Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 1169–1181 | Cite as

Emotional Security and Interparental Conflict: Responses of Adolescents from Different Living Arrangements

  • Silvia López-LarrosaEmail author
  • Vanesa Sánchez-Souto
  • Anh P. Ha
  • E. Mark Cummings
Original Paper

Abstract

Objectives

Interparental conflict (IPC) is linked with adolescents’ heightened emotional insecurity about family relations. Our aim was to examine Spanish adolescents’ differential responses to IPC as a function of specific dimensions of IPC and emotional security, in two different living arrangements.

Methods

Participants were 162 adolescents (M age = 15.55 years), comprising a community sample of 86 adolescents living with their families (CF) and an at-risk sample of 76 adolescents living in residential care (RC). Six video-recorded vignettes depicting everyday IPC were presented, two each of escalated (destructive), constructive, and unresolved conflicts. Multiple dimensions of adolescents’ emotional security responses (i.e., emotional reactivity, behavioral regulation, and cognitive representations) were examined.

Results

Constructive conflicts generated more intense and positive emotions, more constructive cognitive representations, and a behavioral regulation pattern of higher interference. As expected, destructive conflicts generated negative emotions, destructive cognitive representations, and less interference in both groups. Unresolved conflicts had effects on adolescents that were closer to those of destructive conflict. RC adolescents were more emotionally insecure and reactive in response to constructive conflicts than CF adolescents and exhibited a blunted pattern of response to destructive conflicts, even when overall levels of emotional security were controlled. Sensitization to constructive conflict also appeared in adolescents low in emotional security. Girls evidenced greater involvement, less positivity and more negativity than boys.

Conclusions

Our results have implications for understanding RC adolescents’ greater risk for adjustment problems and for broadening the scope of Emotional Security Theory in future research to include additional living arrangements.

Keywords

Interparental conflict Adolescent Residential care Emotional security 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Xunta de Galicia for facilitating information and access to the child protection centers and to the professionals who helped us (headmasters, teachers, actors, video professionals, etc). This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authors Contributions

S.L.-L.: co-designed the study, reviewed the database, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. V.S.-S. collected and entered data, and assisted with writing and reviewing. A.P.H. analyzed data and assisted with analyses, with reviewing and writing. E.M.C. co-designed the study, reviewed the manuscript, suggested analyses and assisted with reviewing and writing.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

IRB approval for the study was provided by the Department of Family, Children and Demographic revitalization (Dirección Xeral de Familia, Infancia e Dinamización Demográfica) of the local (Galician) Government. Parents or legal tutors of the participants or the institutions guarding them (for adolescents in child protections services centers) gave their informed consent for the adolescents to participate and all adolescents assented.

References

  1. Buehler, C., Lange, G., & Franck, K. L. (2007). Adolescents‘ cognitive and emotional responses to marital hostility. Child Development, 78(3), 775–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campos, G. (2013). Transición a la vida adulta de los jóvenes acogidos en residencias de protección (Doctoral dissertation). Madrid (Spain): Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hilllsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Criado del Rio, M., Castellano- Arroyo, M., & Sánchez Blanque, A. (1990). Características del medio familiar de los menores institucionalizados, delincuentes y no delincuentes. Psicopatología, 10, 7–10.Google Scholar
  5. Cummings, E. M. (1995). The usefulness of experiments for the study of the family. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cummings, E. M., Ballard, M., El-Sheikh, M., & Lake, M. (1991). Resolution and children’s responses to interadult anger. Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 462–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. (1994). Children and marital conflict: The impact of family dispute and resolution. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (1999). Depressed parents and family functioning: Interpersonal effects and children´s functioning and development. In T. Joiner & J. Coyne (eds.), The interactional nature of depression: Advances in interpersonal approaches (pp. 299–327). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2002). Effects of marital conflict on children: recent advances and emerging themes in process-oriented research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 43, 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2010). Marital conflict and children. New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cummings, E. M., Goeke- Morey, M., & Papp, L. M. (2003). Children´s responses to everyday marital conflict tactics in the home. Child Development, 74(6), 1918–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummings, E. M., Goeke-Morey, M., Papp, L. M., & Dukewich, T. L. (2002). Children´s responses to mothers´and fathers´emotionality and tactics in marital conflict in the home. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 478–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cummings, E. M., Koss, K. J., & Davies, P. T. (2015). Prospective relations between family conflict and adolescent maladjustment: security in the family system as a mediating process. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cummings, E. M., & Miller-Graff, L. E. (2015). Emotional security theory: an emerging theoretical model for youths’ psychological and physiological responses across multiple developmental contexts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 208–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cummings, E. M., Vogel, D., Cummings, J. S., & El- Sheikh, M. (1989). Children´s responses to different forms of expression of anger between adults. Child Development, 60, 1392–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies, P. T., Coe, J. L., Martin, M. J., Sturge-Apple, M. L., & Cummings, E. M. (2015). The developmental costs and benefits of children’s involvement in interparental conflict. Developmental Psychology, 51(8), 1026–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davies, P. T., Forman, E. M., Rasi, J. A., & Stevens, K. I. (2002). Assessing children’s emotional security in the interparental subsystem: the Security in the Interparental Subsystem (SIS) scales. Child Development, 73, 544–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies, P. T., Harold, G. T., Goeke-Morey, M., & Cummings, E. M. (2002). Children’s emotional security and interparental conflict. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67, 1–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davies, P. T., Hentges, R. F., Coe, J. L., Martin, M. J., Sturge-Apple, M. L., & Cummings, E. M. (2016). The multiple faces of interparental conflict: implications for cascades of children’s insecurity and externalizing problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(5), 664–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davies, P. T., & Martin, M. (2014). Children’s coping and adjustment in high-conflict homes: the reformulation of emotional security theory. Child Development Perspectives, 24(8), 242–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davies, P. T., Myers, R. L., & Cummings, E. M. (1996). Responses of children and adolescents to marital conflict scenarios as a function of the emotionality of conflict endings. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  22. Davies, P. T., Myers, R. L., Cummings, E. M., & Heindel, S. (1999). Adult conflict history and children´s subsequent responses to conflict: an experimental test. Journal of Family Psychology, 13(4), 610–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davies, P. T., & Sturge- Apple, M. L. (2007). Advances in the formulation of emotional security theory: an ethologically based perspective. Advances in Child Behavior and Development, 35, 87–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Doom, J. R., Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (2014). Longitudinal patterns of cortisol regulation differ in maltreated and nonmaltreated children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(11), 1206–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. El-Sheikh, M., Ballard, M., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Individual differences in preschoolers’ physiological and verbal responses to videotaped angry interactions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 22, 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forman, E., & Davies, P. T. (2005). Assessing children´s appraisals of security in the family system: the development of the Security in the Family System (SIFS) scales. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(8), 900–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fosco, G. M., & Grych, J. H. (2012). Capturing the family context of emotion regulation: a family systems model comparison approach. Journal of Family Issues, 34(4), 557–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goeke- Morey, M. C., Cummings, E. M., & Papp, L. M. (2007). Children and marital conflict resolution: implications for emotional security and adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 744–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goeke-Morey, M. C., Cummings, E. M., Harold, G., & Shelton, K. H. (2003). Categories and continua of destructive and constructive marital conflict tactics from the perspective of U.S and Welsh Children. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(3), 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goeke-Morey, M., Papp, L. M., & Cummings, E. M. (2013). Changes in marital conflict and youths´ responses across childhood and adolescence: a test of sensitization. Development and psychopathology, 25, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1993). Children’s appraisals of marital conflict: initial investigations of the cognitive-contextual framework. Child Development, 64, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ha, A. P., Bergman, K. N., Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (2018). Parental postconflict explanations: implications for children’s adjustment outcomes. Family Court Review, 56(2), 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harold, G. T., Shelton, K. H., Goeke-Morey, M. C., & Cummings, E. M. (2004). Marital conflict and child adjustment: Prospective longitudinal tests of the mediating role of children´s emotional security about family relationships. Social Development, 13(3), 350–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kreidler, S. M., Muller, K. E., Grunwald, G. K., Ringham, B. M., Coker-Dukowitz, Z. T., Sakhadeo, U. R., Barón, A. E., & Glueck, D. H. (2013). GLIMMPSE: online power computation for linear models with and without a baseline covariate. Journal of Statistical Software, 54(10), 1–26. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3882200/.
  35. Koss, K. J., George, M. R. W., Bergman, K. N., Cummings, E. M., Davies, P. T., & Cicchetti, D. (2011). Understanding children´s emotional processes and behavioral strategies in the context of marital conflict. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 336–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. López Larrosa, S., Sánchez Souto, V., & Mendiri-Ruiz de Alda, P. (2012). Los adolescentes y el conflicto interparental destructivo: impacto en la percepción del sistema familiar y diferencias según el tipo de familia, la edad y el sexo de los adolescentes. Universitas Psychologica, 11(4), 1262–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. López-Larrosa, S., Mendiri-Ruiz de Alda, P., & Sánchez Souto, V. (2016). Validación de la escala Seguridad en el Sistema Familiar (SIFS) en dos muestras españolas de adolescentes y jóvenes residentes con su familia e institucionalizados. Universitas Psychologica, 15(2), 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luzón García, A., & Domínguez Alonso, J. (2014). El menor infractor que comete su primer delito. Revista sobre la infancia y la adolescencia, 7, 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martín, E., & Dávila, L. M. (2008). Redes de apoyo social y adaptación de los menores en acogimiento residencial. Psicothema, 20(2), 229–235.Google Scholar
  40. McCoy, K., Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2009). Constructive and destructive marital conflict, emotional security and children´s prosocial behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(3), 270–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muñiz, J., Elosúa, P., & Hableton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición. Psicothema, 25(2), 151–157.Google Scholar
  42. Ouellet-Morin, I., Odgers, C. L., Danese, A., Bowes, L., Shakoor, S., Papadopoulos, A. S., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Arseneault, L. (2011). Blunted cortisol responses to stress signal social and behavioral problems among maltreated/bullied 12-year-old children. Biological Psychiatry, 70(11), 1016–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Richmond, M. K., & Stocker, C. M. (2007). Changes in children’s appraisals of marital discord from childhood through adolescence. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(3), 416–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rhoades, K. A. (2008). Children’s responses to interparental conflict: a meta-analysis of their association with child adjustment. Child Development, 79(6), 1942–1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sánchez-Souto, V., & López-Larrosa, S. (2010). El conflicto en 8 historias. A Coruña: Servizo de Recursos Audiovisuales da Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.Google Scholar
  46. Schermerhorn, A. C., Cummings, E. M., DeCarlo, C. A., & Davies, P. T. (2007). Children’s Influence in the Marital Relationship. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 259–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shamir, H., Cummings, E. M., Davies, P. T., & Goeke- Morey, M. C. (2005). Children´s reactions to Marital Conflict in Israel and in the United States. Parenting: Science and Practice, 5(4), 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shelton, K. H., Harold, G. T., Goeke-Morey, M. C., & Cummings, E. M. (2006). Children’s coping with marital conflict: the role of conflict expression and gender. Social Development, 15(2), 232–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shifflett- Simpson, K., & Cummings, E. M. (1996). Mixed message resolution and children’s responses to interadult conflict. Child Development, 67(2), 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thompson, R. A., Lewis, M. D., & Calkins, S. D. (2008). Reassessing emotion regulation. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Psicología Facultad de Ciencias de la EducaciónUniversidade da CoruñaA CoruñaSpain
  2. 2.University of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations