Examining the Relationship between Helicopter Parenting and Emerging Adults’ Mindsets Using the Consolidated Helicopter Parenting Scale
The purpose of this study was to develop a consolidated helicopter parenting scale (CHPS) from five existing measures of helicopter parenting and utilize the new measure to examine the relationship between helicopter parenting and intelligence mindset.
Participants were 275 emerging adults between 18–25 years of age who completed an online survey. First, we conducted an Exploratory Factor Analysis of five helicopter parenting measures to develop a scale that reliably measured participants’ reports of helicopter parenting by both their mothers and fathers. Then, we utilized the new measure to examine whether helicopter parenting mediated the relationship between emerging adults’ report of their parents’ failure mindsets and their own intelligence mindsets.
The 10 items retained in the factor analysis primarily captured emerging adults’ perception that their parents’ involvement was inappropriate rather than delineating objective behaviors in which their parents engaged. Both mothers and fathers were more likely to engage in helicopter parenting when emerging adults reported their parents had a failure mindset. However, only fathers’ helicopter parenting mediated the relationship between parents’ failure mindsets and their children’s intelligence mindsets.
When parents were viewed as having a failure-is-debilitating mindset, emerging adults also reported that fathers were more likely to participate in helicopter parenting behaviors, which was associated with fixed mindsets in emerging adults. People with fixed mindsets have been found to have decreased motivation (e.g., avoiding challenges and less perseverance) and academic achievement in prior research.
KeywordsHelicopter parenting Failure mindset Intelligence mindset Growth mindset Fixed mindset
This research was conducted in compliance with the ethical standards of the American Psychological Association.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This research was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the university where it was conducted, which has Federal-wide Assurance from the Office of Human Research Protection (OHRP). Thus, all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. No identifying information was obtained during data collection.
- Boaler, J. (2013). Ability and mathematics: The mindset revolution that is reshaping education. Forum, 55, 143–152. http://www.you-cubed.org/wp-content/uploads/14_Boaler_FORUM_55_1_web.pdf.
- Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9. https://www.pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7.pdf.
- Cui, M., Graber, J. A., Metz, A., & Darling, C. A. (2016). Parental indulgence, self-regulation, and young adults’ behavioral and emotional problems. Journal of Family Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2016.1237884.
- Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Dweck, C. S. (2007). The secret to raising smart kids. Scientific American Mind, 18, 36–43. http://users.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/public_media/raising_smart_kids.pdf.
- Dweck, C. S. (2010). Even geniuses work hard. Educational Leadership, 68, 16–20. http://cdn-blogs.waukeeschools.org/maplegrovepdpost/files/2013/03/Even-Geniuses-Work-Hard.pdf.
- Fingerman, K. L., Cheng, Y. P., Wesselmann, E. D., Zarit, S., Furstenberg, F., & Birditt, K. S. (2012). Helicopter parents and landing pad kids: intense parental support of grown children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00987.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Kuo, Y. C., & Hsu, W. Y. (2015). Parental monitoring and helicopter parenting relevant to vocational student’s procrastination and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson, L. J., Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Nielson, M. G. (2015). Is hovering smothering or loving? An examination of parental warmth as a moderator of relations between helicopter parenting and emerging adults’ indices of adjustment. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815576458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson, M. K. (2010). Parenting out of control: Anxious parents in uncertain times. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Park, D., Gunderson, E. A., Tsukayama, E., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). Young children’s motivational frameworks and math achievement: Relation to teacher-reported instructional practices, but not teacher theory of intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pelegrina, S., Garcı́a-Linares, M. C., & Casanova, P. F. (2003). Adolescents and their parents’ perceptions about parenting characteristics. Who can better predict the adolescent’s academic competence? Journal of Adolescence, 26, 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00062-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Geary, K., Miles-McLean, H., Tashner, T., Hagerman, C., & Rizzo, K. (2014). Mother, father, or parent? College students’ intensive parenting attitudes differ by referent. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 1073–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9764-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., Geary, K. A., Erchull, M. J., & Tashner, T. (2014). Helping or hovering? The effects of helicopter parenting on college students’ well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 548–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9716-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shoup, R., Gonyea, R. M., & Kuh, G. D. (2009). Helicopter parents: examining the impact of highly involved parents on student engagement and educational outcomes. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Atlanta, Georgia. http://cpr.indiana.edu/uploads/AIR%202009%20Impact%20of%20Helicopter%20Parents.pdf.
- Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29, 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., & Beyers, W., et al. (2007). Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: adolescent perceptions of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 43, 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Somers, P., & Settle, J. (2010). The helicopter parent: Research toward a typology. College and University: The Journal of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars, 86, 18–27. https://www.aacrao.org/research-publications/quarterly-journals/college-university-journal/article/c-u-archive/c-u-vol.-86-no.-1-summer-2010.
- van Ingen, D. J., Freiheit, S. R., Steinfeldt, J. A., Moore, L. L., Wimer, D. J., Knutt, A. D., & Roberts, A. (2015). Helicopter parenting: the effect of an overbearing caregiving style on peer attachment and self‐efficacy. Journal of College Counseling, 18, 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2015.00065.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar