Advertisement

Mentalization in Chilean Mothers with Children Aged 12 and 30 Months: Relation to Child Sex and Temperament and Family Socioeconomic Status

  • Carolina ÁlvarezEmail author
  • Paula Cristi
  • María Trinidad Del Real
  • Chamarrita Farkas
Original Paper

Abstract

Objectives

Maternal mentalization refers to a mother’s ability to consider her child as a subject with a mind and reflect this understanding through references to mental states in her speech with the child. Mentalization is relevant for a child’s attachment and theory of mind. The aim of this research is to describe mentalization among a group of Chilean mothers with their children at two time periods −12 and 30 months of age-, analyze developmental changes between both ages and examine the relationship among maternal mentalization, the child’s sex and temperament and the family socioeconomic status.

Methods

The research used a sample of 90 dyads, and the instruments utilized include a sociodemographic questionnaire, a mentalization assessment and Rothbart’s temperament questionnaires (IBQ-R-VSF and ECBQ-VSF).

Results

The results showed a decline in references to desires and physical states and an increase in causal talk and cognitions at 30 months of age compared to 12 months. In 12-month-old children, only the temperament dimension of negative affect demonstrated a relationship with factual talk and SES related to emotions. Whereas at 30 months, the dimensions of extraversion, regulation and child’s sex related to references to desires, causal talk, emotions and physical states. The mothers’ socioeconomic status (SES) related to references to desires.

Conclusions

The best predictor of change in mentalization between both ages was maternal education level.

Keywords

Maternal mentalization Child temperament Child’s sex Socioeconomic status Early infancy 

Notes

Author Contributions

C.A. guided the edition process of the manuscript and collaborated with the literature research. P.C. and M.T.D.R. assisted with the literature research. C.F. executed the analyses and helped with the design of the paper. The writing of the paper was a collaboration of the team.

Funding

This research was supported by grant from the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT N° 1110087 and N°1160110).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile research committee and The American Psychological Association and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Adimark. (2000). El nivel socioeconómico ESOMAR. Manual de aplicación [Socioeconomic level ESOMAR, application Manual]. Santiago, Chile: Adimark GfK.Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, L. M. (2011). Emotion language in early childhood: relations with children’s emotion regulation strategy understanding and emotional self-regulation (Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University).Google Scholar
  4. Brophy-Herb, H., Stansbury, K., Bocknek, E., & Horodynski, M. (2012). Modeling maternal emotion-related socialization behaviors in a low-income sample: Relations with toddlers’ self-regulation. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(3), 352–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.11.005.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J. R., & Dunn, J. (1996). Continuities in emotion understanding from three to six years. Child Development, 67(3), 789–802.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131861.Google Scholar
  6. Chile Crece Contigo (2015). Programa de apoyo al desarrollo biopsicosocial (PADB) y Programa de apoyo al recién nacido(a) (PARN). Catálogo de prestaciones 2015. [Support program to biopsychosocial development (PABD) and support program, to newborn (PARN). 2015 benefits catalogue].Google Scholar
  7. Chaplin, T. M., & Aldao, A. (2013). Gender differences in emotion expression in children: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 735–765.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030737.Google Scholar
  8. Cova, S., Valdivia, P., & Maganto, M. (2005). Diferencias de género en psicopatología en la niñez: Hipótesis explicativas [Gender differences in infancy’s psychopathology: Explicative hypotheses]. Revista chilena Délelőtt pediatría, 76(4), 418–424.Google Scholar
  9. Dickinson, D. K., Hofer, K. G., Barnes, E. M., & Grifenhagen, J. F. (2014). Examining teachers’ language in head Start classrooms from a systemic linguistics approach. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(3), 231–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.02.006.Google Scholar
  10. Ensink, K., Normandin, L., Plamondon, A., Berthelot, N., & Fonagy, P. (2016). Intergenerational pathways from reflective functioning to infant attachment through parenting. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Délután Comportement, 48(1), 9–18.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000030.Google Scholar
  11. Farkas, C., Carvacho, C., Galleguillos, F., Montoya, F., León, F., Santelices, M. P., & Himmel, E. (2015). Estudio comparativo de la sensibilidad entre madres y personal educativo en interacción con niños y niñas de un año de edad [Comparative study between mothers’ and teachers’ sensitivity in interaction with one-year-old children]. Perfiles Educativos, 37(148), 16–33.Google Scholar
  12. Farkas, C., del Real, M. T., Strasser, K., Álvarez, C., Santelices, M. P., & Sieverson, C. (2018). Maternal mental state language during storytelling versus free-play contexts and its relation to child language and socioemotional outcomes at 12 and 30 months of age. Cognitive Development, 47, 181–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.06.009.Google Scholar
  13. Farkas, C., Strasser, K., Badilla, G. & Santelices, M. P. (2017). Mentalization in Chilean educational staff with 12-month-old children: Does it make a difference in relation to what children receive at home? Early Education and Development.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1287994.
  14. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  15. Frampton, K., Perlman, M., & Jenkins, J. (2009). Caregivers’ use of metacognitive language in child care centers: Prevalence and predictors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(3), 248–262.Google Scholar
  16. Gartstein, M. A., & Rothbart, M. K. (2003). Studying infant temperament via the revised Infant Behavior Questionnaire. Infant Behavior and Development, 26(1), 64–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00169-8.Google Scholar
  17. Jessee, A., McElwain, N. L., & Booth-LaForce, C. (2016). Maternal supportive behavior, cognitive talk, and desire/emotion talk at 24 months: Distinct factors and differential antecedents. Parenting, 16(2), 63–86.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2016.1134988.Google Scholar
  18. Jonn-Seed, M. S., & Weiss, S. J. (2005). Maternal state of mind and expressed emotion: Impact of mothers’ mental health, stress, and family satisfaction. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 11(3), 135–143.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390305279025.Google Scholar
  19. Kivijärvi, M., Räihä, H., Kaljonen, A., Tamminen, T., & Piha, J. (2005). Infant temperament and maternal sensitivity behavior in the first year of life. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46(1), 421–428.Google Scholar
  20. LePage, H. D. (2003). Effects of single parents’ gender role attitudes on adolescents’ gender role attitudes (Order No. 3097847). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (305270625). http://ezproxy.puc.cl/docview/305270625?accountid=16788.
  21. Manlove, E. E., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2002). Caring for infant daughters and sons in dual-earner households: Maternal reports of father involvement in weekday time and tasks. Infant and Child Development, 11(4), 305–320.  https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.260.Google Scholar
  22. Manrique, D., Ghesquière, P., & Van Leeuwen, K. (2014). Parenting, socioeconomic status and psychosocial functioning in Peruvian families and their children. Anales Délelőtt Psicología, 30(3), 995–1005.Google Scholar
  23. Martínez-Fuentes, M. T., Brito de la Nuez, A. G., & Pérez-López, J. (2000). Temperamento del niño y personalidad de la madre como antecedentes de la seguridad del apego [Child’s temperament and mother’s personality as antecedents of attachment security]. Anuario Délelőtt psicología/The Ubung Journal of Psychology, 31(1), 25–42.Google Scholar
  24. Meins, E., Centifanti, L. C. M., Fernyhough, C., & Fishburn, S. (2013). Maternal mind-mindedness and children’s behavioral difficulties: Mitigating the impact of low socioeconomic status. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(4), 543–553.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9699-3.Google Scholar
  25. Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Arnott, B., Leekam, S. R., & Rosnay, M. (2013). Mind‐mindedness and theory of mind: mediating roles of language and perspectival symbolic play. Child Development, 84(5), 1777–1790.Google Scholar
  26. Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., De Rosnay, M., Arnott, B., Leekam, S. R., & Turner, M. (2012). Mind‐mindedness as a multidimensional construct: Appropriate and non-attuned mind‐related comments independently predict infant–mother attachment in a socially diverse sample. Infancy, 17(4), 393–415.Google Scholar
  27. Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Russel, J., & Clark-Carter, D. (1998). Security of attachment as a predictor of symbolic and mentalising abilities: A longitudinal study. Social Development, 7, 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00047.Google Scholar
  28. Murnen, S. K., & Don, B. P. (2012). Body image and gender roles. Encyclopedia of Body Image and Human Appearance, 1, 128–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384925-0.00019-5.Google Scholar
  29. Olhaberry, M. (2012). Interacciones tempranas y género infantil en familias monoparentales chilenas. Revista Latinoamericana Délelőtt Psicología, 44(2), 75–86.Google Scholar
  30. Papalia, D. E., & Feldman, R. D. (2012). Desarrollo humano [Human development]. 12° edition Santiago, Chile: McGraw Hill Education.Google Scholar
  31. Pascal, B., Aguardo, G., Sotillo, M., & Masdeu, J. C. (2008). Acquisition of mental state language in Spanish children: A longitudinal study of the relationship between the production of mental verbs and linguistic development. Developmental Science, 11(4), 454–466.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00691.x.Google Scholar
  32. Putnam, S. P., Gartstein, M. A., & Rothbart, M. K. (2006). Measurement of fine-grained aspects of toddler temperament: the early childhood behavior questionnaire. Infant Behavior and Development, 29(3), 386–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.01.004.Google Scholar
  33. Putnam, S. P., Helbig, A. L., Gartstein, M. A., Rothbart, M. K., & Leerkes, E. (2014). Development and assessment of short and very short forms of the infant behavior questionnaire-revised. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(4), 445–458.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.841171.Google Scholar
  34. Putnam, S. P., Jacobs, J., Gartstein, M. A. & Rothbart, M. K. (2010). Development and assessment of short and very short forms of the Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire. Poster presented at International Conference on Infant Studies, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  35. Rothbart, M. K. (2004). Commentary: differentiated measures of temperament and multiple pathways to childhood disorders. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(1), 82–87.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3301_8.Google Scholar
  36. Rothbart, M. K., & Derryberry, P. (1981). Development of individual differences in temperament. In M. E. Lamb & A. Brown (Eds.), Advances in Developmental Psychology (pp. 37–86). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Rowe, M. (2008). Child-directed speech: relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 35, 185–205.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008343.Google Scholar
  38. Rowe, M., & Casillas, A. (2011). Parental goals and talk with toddlers. Infant and Child Development, 20(5), 475–494.  https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.709.Google Scholar
  39. Santelices, M. P., Farkas, C., Montoya, M. F., Galleguillos, F., Carvacho, C., Fernández, A., Morales, L., Taboada, C., & Himmel, E. (2015). Factores predictivos de sensibilidad materna en infancia temprana [Predictive factors of maternal sensitivity in early infancy]. Psicoperspectivas, 14(1), 66–76.  https://doi.org/10.5027/PSICOPERSPECTIVAS-VOL14-ISSUE1-FULLTEXT-441.Google Scholar
  40. Schwab, J. F., & Lew-Williams, C. (2016). Language learning, socioeconomic status, and child-directed speech. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews, 7(4), 264–275.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1393.Google Scholar
  41. Schoppe‐Sullivan, S. J., Diener, M. L., Mangelsdorf, S. C., Brown, G. L., McHale, J. L., & Frosch, C. A. (2006). Attachment and sensitivity in family context: the roles of parent and infant gender. Infant and Child Development, 15(4), 367–385.  https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.449.Google Scholar
  42. Sharp, C., & Fonagy, G. (2008). The parent’s capacity to treat the child as a psychological agent: Constructs, measures and implications for developmental psychopathology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Slade, A., Grienenberger, J., Bernbach, E., Levy, D., & Locker, A. (2005). Maternal reflective functioning, attachment, and the transmission gap: a preliminary study. Attachment and Human Development, 7(3), 283–298.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730500245880.Google Scholar
  44. Stich, M., Girolametto, L., Johnson, C. J., Cleave, P. L., & Chen, X. (2015). Contextual effects on the conversations of mothers and their children with language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 323–344.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000258.Google Scholar
  45. Susperreguy, M. I., Strasser, K., Lissi, M. R., & Mendive, S. (2007). Creencias y prácticas de literacidad en familias chilenas con distintos niveles educativos [Beliefs and practices of literacy in Chilean families with different levels of education]. Revista Latinoamericana Délelőtt Psicología, 39(2), 239–251.Google Scholar
  46. Taumoepeau, M., & Ruffman, T. (2006). Mother and infant talk about mental states relates to desire language and emotion understanding. Child Development, 77(2), 465–481.Google Scholar
  47. Taumoepeau, M., & Ruffman, T. (2008). Stepping stones to others’ minds: Maternal talk relates to child mental state language and emotion understanding at 15, 24, and 33 months. Child Development, 79(2), 284–302.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01126.x.Google Scholar
  48. Thompson, R. B., & Foster, B. J. (2014). Socioeconomic status and parent-child relationships predict metacognitive questions to preschoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43(4), 315–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9256-4.Google Scholar
  49. Van Kleeck, A., Vander Woude, J., & Hammett, L. (2006). Fostering literal and inferential language skills in head start preschoolers with language impairment using scripted book-sharing discussions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(1), 85–95.  https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2006/009).Google Scholar
  50. Wei, H. S., & Chen, J. K. (2013). The relationships between family financial stress, mental health problems, child rearing practice, and school involvement among Taiwanese parents with school-aged children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(7), 1145–1154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9772-8.Google Scholar
  51. Woldarsky, V., Urzúa, C., Farkas, C. & Vallotton, C. D. (2018). Differences in maternal sensitivity responses according to child gender and temperament at 12 months old: a comparative study between Chile and USA. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology SchoolPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations