Portuguese version of the Partner Support for Father Involvement Scale: Preliminary Validation
Partner support in the performance of the parenting role is critical, as it increases father involvement in the care of the child. However, the measures to assess this type of support are scarce. This study presents the preliminary validation of the Portuguese version of the Partner Support for Father Involvement (PSFI) scale (confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance models, reliability, and concurrent and discriminant validity).
The participants were 486 independent (unrelated) parents, 243 fathers (Mage = 42.13, SD = 5.57) and 243 mothers (Mage = 39.67, SD = 4.78), who completed the PSFI (translated version), the EMBU and the Co-parenting Questionnaire.
Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the Portuguese PSFI had a three factor structure, in line with the original version of the scale (χ2 = 208.690, p < .001, CFI = .949, TLI = .931, SRMR = .040, RMSEA = .083, 90% CI [.072, .095]). An invariance analysis across mothers and fathers revealed the same structure for both. Cronbach’s alpha reliabilities were acceptable. Additionally, preliminary evidence of the scale’s concurrent and discriminant validity was found.
The results point to the suitability of the measure for the Portuguese population, namely in research contexts examining one partner’s perspective of the other partner’s involvement in parenting, and to its potential applicability for cross-cultural research. The measure will also be useful in clinical settings, namely as a tool in pre and post-intervention assessment, however further studies are needed to test this type of applicability.
KeywordsFather involvement Partner support Validation study Psychometric properties PSFI
Conceptualization and design of the study were done by N.A., S.V-S., M-T.R.; data collection was done by N.A.; statistical analysis was done by M.-S.R.; Writing, Revision and Editing were done by N.A., S.V.-S., M.-T.R., M.S.R.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (Faculty of Psychology of the University of Lisbon) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Aboim, S. (2010). Género, família e mudança em Portugal [Gender, family and change in Portugal]. In K. Wall, S. Aboim & V. Cunha (Eds), A vida familiar no masculino: Negociando velhas e novas masculinidades [Family life in masculinity: Negotiating old and new masculinities] (pp. 39–66). Lisboa: Comissão para a Igualdade no Trabalho e no Emprego [Commission for Equality in Labour and Employment].Google Scholar
- Ball, J., & Daly, K. (2012). Father involvement in Canada: a transformative approach. In J. Ball & K. J. Daly (Eds), Father involvement in Canada: Diversity, renewal, and transformation (pp. 1–25). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
- Bernard, S., Whitson, M., & Kaufman, J. (2015). The moderating effect of positive father engagement and accessibility on a school-based system of care intervention for mental health outcomes of children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 2923–2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0096-0.
- Bernardi, S. I. (2013). The relationship between role salience and work-family conflict among parents in dual-earner families (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Educational & Counseling Psychology, State University of New York at Albany. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1434888375?accountid=43959.
- Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cabrera, N., Tamis-LeMonda, C., Lamb, M., & Boller, K. (1999, August). Measuring father involvement in The Early Head Start Evaluation: A multidimensional conceptualization. Paper presented at the National Conference on Health Statistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Canavarro, M. C. (1996). Avaliação das práticas educativas através do EMBU: Estudos psicométricos [Assessing educative practices by the EMBU: Psychometric studies]. Psychologica, 16, 5–18.Google Scholar
- Christopher, C., Umemura, T., Mann, T., Jacobvitz, D., & Hazen, N. (2015). Marital quality over the transition to parenthood as a predictor of coparenting. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 3636–3651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0172-0.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: integration in personality. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Current theory and research in motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1990: Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38 pp. 237–288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Hurley, A., Scandura, T., Schriesheim, C., Brannick, M., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R., & Williams, L. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199711)18:6<667:AID-JOB874>3.0.CO;2-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lamb, M. E. (1987). Introduction: the emergent American father. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The father’s role: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Major, S., & Seabra-Santos, M. J. (2013). Uso de inventários comportamentais para a avaliação socioemocional em idade pré-escolar [Use of behavioral inventories for socio-emotional assessment in pre-school children]. Avaliação Psicológica, 12(1), 101–107.Google Scholar
- Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K., the International Teste Commission. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición [Guidelines for test translation and adaptation: Second edition]. Psicothema, 25, 151–157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24.Google Scholar
- National Center on Fathers and Families. (2001). The fathering indicators framework: A tool for quantitative and qualitative analysis. Philadelphia: Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. 3rd edn. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Palkovitz, R. (2002). Involved fathering and child development: advancing our understanding of good fathering. In C. S. Tamis-LeMonda & N. Cabrera (Eds), Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 119–167). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Pedro, M. F., & Ribeiro, M. T. (2015). Adaptação portuguesa do Questionário de Coparentalidade: Análise fatorial confirmatória e estudos de fiabilidade e validade [Portuguese adaptation of the Coparenting Questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis and reliability and validity studies]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28(1), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528113.Google Scholar
- Perris, C., Jacobsson, L., Lindstrom, H., von Knorring, L., & Perris, H. (1980). Development of a new inventory assessing memories of parental rearing behaviour. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 61, 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1980.tb00581.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roopnarine, J. L. (2015). Introduction: toward a pancultural understanding of constructions and meanings of fathering. In J. L. Roopnarine (Ed.), Fathers across cultures: The importance, roles, and diverse practices of dads (pp. 1–13). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.
- semTools Contributors (2016). semTools: useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0. 4–9. http://cran.r-project.org/packagesemTools.
- Seward, R. R., & Stanley-Stevens, L. (2014). Fathers, fathering, and fatherhood across cultures. In H. Selin (Ed.), Parenting across cultures: Childrearing, motherhood and fatherhood in non-western cultures (pp. 459–474). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Trahan, M. (2017). Paternal self-efficacy and father involvement: a bidirectional relationship. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000130.
- Wall, K. (2015). Fathers in Portugal: from old to new masculinities. In J. L. Roopnarine (Ed.), Fathers across cultures: The importance, roles, and diverse practices of dads (pp. 132–154). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
- Wall, K., Aboim, S., & Cunha, V. (2010). A vida familiar no masculino: Negociando velhas e novas masculinidades [Family life in masculinity: Negotiating old and new masculinities]. Lisboa: Comissão para a Igualdade no Trabalho e no Emprego [Committee on Equality in Work and Employment].Google Scholar
- Yoo, Y., Adamsons, K., Robinson, J., & Sabatelli, R. (2015). Longitudinal influence of paternal distress on children’s representations of fathers, family cohesion, and family conflict. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 591–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9870-7.