Do Profiles of Adolescent Temperament Differ on Family Processes and Adult Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms?
In the present study, we examined whether profiles of temperamental features in adolescence (a) predict internalizing and externalizing symptoms in early adulthood, and (b) differ in family processes (i.e., cohesion, conflict) during early adolescence. Participants were 662 youth (72% male; 76% White). Mothers reported on family cohesion and conflict during participants’ early adolescence (ages 12–14, Time 1). Youth completed measures of temperament in middle adolescence (ages 16, Time 2), and of their symptoms in middle adolescence (Time 2), late adolescence (age 19, Time 3), and early adulthood (age 22, Time 4). Latent profile analysis identified three temperamental profiles: low positive mood, low rhythmicity, and well-regulated. Individuals in the low rhythmicity profile reported higher levels of externalizing symptoms compared to the well-regulated profile. No between-profile differences were found for internalizing symptoms. Mothers of youth in the low positive mood and low rhythmicity profiles reported higher levels of family conflict than the well-regulated profile. In addition, mothers of youth in the low positive mood profile reported lower levels of family cohesion than the well-regulated profile. Research implications of the study findings are presented.
KeywordsTemperament Latent profiles Internalizing symptoms Externalizing symptoms Family processes Early adulthood
This research was supported in part by NIDA grant P50 DA005605 awarded to Ralph E. Tarter.
J.R.: developed the conceptual model that guided the paper, conducted the analyses, and wrote the majority of the paper. D.D.: assisted with conducting the analyses and heavily edited the paper. J.P.: conducted literature reviews for the paper and completed the references section. M.R.: assisted with data collection and edited the paper.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The present study involved human participants and informed consent was obtained from these participants. Procedure used to conduct the research described in this manuscript were approved by a university internal review board.
The following study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Pittsburgh. All participants provided informed consent and were notified that their participation in the study was voluntary.
- Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the youth-self report and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT, USA: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
- Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. (2001). ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington, VT, USA: ASEBA.Google Scholar
- Bornstein, M. H., Putnick, D. L., Lansford, J. E., Pastorelli, C., Skinner, A. T., Sorbring, E., & Oburu, P. (2015). Mother and father social desirable responding in nine countries: two kinds of agreement and relations to parenting self-reports. International Journal of Psychology, 50, 174–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., Spinrad, T. L., Liew, J., Zhou, Q., Reiser, M., Cumberland, A., & Losoya, S. H. (2009). Longitudinal relations of children’s effortful control, impulsivity, and negative emotionality to their externalizing, internalizing, and co-occurring behavior problems. Developmental Psychology, 45, 988–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fanti, K. A., & Henrich, C. C. (2010). Trajectories of pure and co-occurring internalizing and externalizing problems from age 2 to age 12: findings from the national institute of child health and human development study of early child care. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1159–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IBM Corp. Released. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- Laceulle, O. M., Ormel, J., Vollebergh, W. A. M., van Aken, M. A. G., & Nederhof, E. (2014). A test of the vulnerability model: Temperament and temperament change as predictors of future mental disorders – the TRAILS study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moos, R. H., Insel, P. M., & Humphrey, B. (1974). Preliminary manual for family environment scale, work environment scale, group environment scale. Washington D.C., USA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Mun, E. Y., Fitzgerald, H. M., Von Eye, A., Puttler, L. I., & Zucker, R. A. (2001). Temperamental characteristics as predictors of externalizing and internalizing child behavior problems in the contexts of high and low parental psychopathology. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th edn.). Los Angeles, CA, USA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Nelson, L. J., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Badger, S., McNamara Barry, C., Carroll, J. S., & Madsen, S. D. (2008). Associations between shyness and internalizing behaviors, externalizing behaviors, and relationships during emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. New York, NY, USA: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar