Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 30–41 | Cite as

Development and Validation of a Parenting Scale Short Form (PS-8) in a Representative Population Sample

  • Sören KliemEmail author
  • Anna Lohmann
  • Thomas Mößle
  • Heather M. Foran
  • Kurt Hahlweg
  • Markus Zenger
  • Elmar Brähler
Original Paper
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

Early mental and behavioral disorders are significant predictors of psychopathologies in adulthood. Parenting behavior (e.g., overreactivity and laxness) influences the development of behavioral problems in children. It is thus often assessed in therapeutic settings, as well as in the context of intervention studies. The aim of this study was to develop a short form of the Parenting Scale (PS), PS-8, and to evaluate its psychometric properties. Based on data from a large pre-school survey, an eight-item short form scale was compiled. The short version was presented to a large representative population sample (N = 539 parents, n = 312 mothers, n = 227 fathers). Psychometric properties were assessed and measurement invariance tests performed. The internal consistency of both PS-8 subscales as well as the mean score were satisfactory. Strict measurement invariance could be confirmed for parental age, gender and age*gender interaction, as well as for the child’s age, gender, and gender*age interaction, allowing unbiased comparison of means, correlation coefficients, path coefficients as well as undistorted screening decisions between the aforementioned groups. Furthermore, the PS-8 mean score was associated with self-rating measures of related constructs (parental anxiety and depression). Hence, the PS-8 presents a reliable, valid and economical tool to assess dysfunctional parenting behavior and can thus be effectively applied within the frameworks of clinical studies, epidemiological research, or related research areas. In future research the convergent validity of the PS-8 with child behavior questionnaires should be assessed.

Keywords

Parenting Scale Confirmatory factor analysis Measurement invariance analysis Laxness Overreactivity 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Solveig Haselbach for the proof reading of the final manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any external funding.

Author Contributions

S.K.: performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the paper. A.L.: assisted with the data analyses and collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript. T.M.: collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript. H.M.F.: collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript. K.H., M.Z. and E.B.: designed and executed the study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was authorized by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig (Az.: 050/13-03.05.2013).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Abidin, R. R., & Konold, T. R. (1999). Parenting Alliance Measure. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
  3. Arney, F., Rogers, H., Baghurst, P., Sawyer, M., & Prior, M. (2008). The reliability and validity of the parenting scale for Australian mothers of preschool-aged children. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 44–52.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530701458076.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, D. S., O’Leary, S. G., Wolff, L. S., & Acker, M. M. (1993). The parenting scale: a measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 137–144.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.137.Google Scholar
  5. Belfer, M. L. (2008). Child and adolescent mental disorders: the magnitude of the problem across the globe. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(3), 226–236.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01855.x.Google Scholar
  6. Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting: a process model. Child Development, 55(1), 83–96.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1129836.Google Scholar
  7. Bernat, D. H., August, G. J., Hektner, J. M., & Bloomquist, M. L. (2007). The Early risers preventive intervention: testing for six-year outcomes and mediational processes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(4), 605–617.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9116-5.Google Scholar
  8. Brody, G. H., Kogan, S. M., Chen, Y.-f, & Murry, V. M. (2008). Long-term effects of the strong African American families program on youths’ conduct problems. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(5), 474–481.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.04.016.Google Scholar
  9. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). MICE: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Teacher’s corner: testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(3), 471–492.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_7.Google Scholar
  13. Collett, B. R., Gimpel, G. A., Greenson, J. N., & Gunderson, T. L. (2001). Assessment of discipline styles among parents of preschool through school-age children. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23(3), 163–170.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010965220517.Google Scholar
  14. Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., & Heming, G. (2005). Two variations of a preventive intervention for couples: effects on parents and children during the transition to elementary school. In P. A. Cowan, C. P. Cowan, J. C. Ablow, V. K. Johnson & J. R. Measelle (Eds.), The family context of parenting in children’s adaptation to elementary school (pp. 227–312). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. de Graaf, I., Speetjens, P., Smit, F., de Wolff, M., & Tavecchio, L. (2008). Effectiveness of the triple p positive parenting program on behavioral problems in children: a meta-analysis. Behavior Modification, 32(5), 714–735.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445508317134.Google Scholar
  16. DeGarmo, D. S., & Forgatch, M. S. (2005). Early development of delinquency within divorced families: evaluating a randomized preventive intervention trial. Developmental Science, 8(3), 229–239.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00412x.Google Scholar
  17. Gerard, A. B. (1994). Parent-child Relationship Inventory. Los Angeles: Western psychological services.Google Scholar
  18. Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2005). Evaluating fidelity: predictive validity afor a measure of competent adherence to the Oregon model of parent management training. Behavior Therapy, 36(1), 3–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80049-8.Google Scholar
  19. Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., Degarmo, D. S., & Beldavs, Z. G. (2009). Testing the Oregon delinquency model with 9-year follow-up of the Oregon Divorce Study. Development and Psychopathology, 21(2), 637–660. doi: 10.1017/S095 4579409000340.Google Scholar
  20. Frick, P. J. (1991). The Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. USA: University of Alabama. Unpublished instrument.Google Scholar
  21. Harmer, A. L., Sanderson, J., & Mertin, P. (1999). Influence of negative childhood experiences on psychological functioning, social support, and parenting for mothers recovering from addiction. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(5), 421–433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00020-4.Google Scholar
  22. Harvey, E., Danforth, J. S., Ulaszek, W. R., & Eberhardt, T. L. (2001). Validity of the parenting scale for parents of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39(6), 731–743.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00052-8.Google Scholar
  23. Hayes, A. (2005). A computational tool for survey shortening applicable to composite attitude, opinion, and personality measurement scales. Retrieved from http://afhayes.com/public/alphamax.pdf.
  24. Herwig, J. E., Wirtz, M., & Bengel, J. (2004). Depression, partnership, social support, and parenting: interaction of maternal factors with behavioral problems of the child. Journal of Affective Disorders, 80(2), 199–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00020-4.Google Scholar
  25. Hu, Lt, & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.Google Scholar
  26. Hurley, K. D., Huscroft-D’Angelo, J., Trout, A., Griffith, A., & Epstein, M. (2014). Assessing parenting skills and attitudes: a review of the psychometrics of parenting measures. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(5), 812–823.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9733-2.Google Scholar
  27. Hussey, J. M., Chang, J. J., & Kotch, J. B. (2006). Child maltreatment in the United States: prevalence, risk factors, and adolescent health consequences. Pediatrics, 118(3), 933–942.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2452.Google Scholar
  28. Irvine, A. B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. V. (1999). The value of the parenting scale for measuring the discipline practices of parents of middle school children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37(2), 127–142.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.6.811.Google Scholar
  29. Kaminski, J. W., Valle, L. A., Filene, J. H., & Boyle, C. L. (2008). A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(4), 567–589.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9201-9.Google Scholar
  30. Karazsia, B. T., van Dulmen, M. H., & Wildman, B. G. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis of Arnold et al.’s parenting scale across race, age, and sex. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 17(4), 500–516.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-007-9170-1.Google Scholar
  31. Keown, L. J., & Woodward, L. J. (2002). Early parent–child relations and family functioning of preschool boys with pervasive hyperactivity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(6), 541–553.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020803412247.Google Scholar
  32. Kieling, C., Baker-Henningham, H., Belfer, M., Conti, G., Ertem, I., Omigbodun, O., & Rahman, A. (2011). Child and adolescent mental health worldwide: evidence for action. The Lancet, 378(9801), 1515–1525.  https://doi.org/10.1016/SO140-6736(11)60827-1.Google Scholar
  33. Kish, L. (1949). A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44, 380–387.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1949.10483314.Google Scholar
  34. Kliem, S., Beller, J., Kröger, C., Birowicz, T., Zenger, M., & Brähler, E. (2014). Dimensional latent structure of somatic symptom reporting in two representative population studies: Results from taxometric analyses. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 484–492.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035721.Google Scholar
  35. Kliem, S., Foran, H. M., Beller, J., Hahlweg, K., Stöbel‐Richter, Y., & Brähler, E. (2015). Dimensional latent structure of relationship quality: Results of three representative population samples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(5), 1190–1201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12211.Google Scholar
  36. Kliem, S., Mößle, T., Rehbein, F., Hellmann, D. F., Zenger, M., & Brähler, E. (2015). A brief form of the Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (F-SozU) was developed, validated, and standardized. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(5), 551–562. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.003.Google Scholar
  37. Kliem, S., Mößle, T., Zenger, M., & Brähler, E. (2013). Reliability and validity of the beck depression inventory-fast screen for medical patients in the general German population. Journal of Affective Disorders, 156, 236–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.003.Google Scholar
  38. Lahey, B. B., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2003). Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2002). Contextual social-cognitive mediators and child outcome: a test of the theoretical model in the Coping Power program. Development and Psychopathology, 14(4), 945–967.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579402004157.Google Scholar
  40. Lorber, M. F., Xu, S., Slep, A. M. S., Bulling, L., & O’Leary, S. G. (2014). A new look at the psychometrics of the Parenting Scale through the lens of item response theory. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 43(4), 613–626.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2014.900717.Google Scholar
  41. Löwe, B., Wahl, I., Rose, M., Spitzer, C., Glaesmer, H., Wingenfeld, K., & Brähler, E. (2010). A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population. Journal of Affective Disorders, 122(1), 86–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.019.Google Scholar
  42. Meredith, W., & Teresi, J. A. (2006). An essay on measurement and factorial invariance. Medical Care, 44(11), 69–77.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245438.73837.89.Google Scholar
  43. Millsap, R. E., & Kwok, O.-M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations. Psychological Methods, 9(1), 93–115.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.9.1.93.Google Scholar
  44. Milner, J. S. (1986). The Child Abuse Potential Inventory: Manual. 2nd ed Webster: Psytec.Google Scholar
  45. Morawska, A., Winter, L., & Sanders, M. (2009). Parenting knowledge and its role in the prediction of dysfunctional parenting and disruptive child behaviour. Child: Care, Health and Development, 35(2), 217–226.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00929.x.Google Scholar
  46. Naumann, S., Bertram, H., Kuschel, A., Heinrichs, N., Hahlweg, K., & Döpfner, M. (2010). Der Erziehungsfragebogen (EFB) [An instrument to assess parental behavioral tendencies in discipline situations with her children]. Diagnostica, 56(3), 144–157.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000018.Google Scholar
  47. Nowak, C., & Heinrichs, N. (2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(3), 114–144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-008-0033-0.Google Scholar
  48. O’Connell, M. E., Boat, T., & Warner, K. E. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. Washington: National Academies Press.  https://doi.org/10.17226/12480. Google Scholar
  49. Pornprasertmanit, S., Miller, P., & Schoemann, A. (2013). SemTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R Package available on CRAN.Google Scholar
  50. Prado, G. J., Schwartz, S. J., Maldonado-Molina, M., Huang, S., Pantin, H. M., Lopez, B., & Szapocznik, J. (2009). Ecodevelopmental x intrapersonal risk: Substance use and sexual behavior in Hispanic adolescents. Health Education & Behavior, 36(1), 45–61.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198107311278.Google Scholar
  51. Prinzie, P., Onghena, P., & Hellinckx, W. (2007). Reexamining the Parenting Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 24–31.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.1.24.Google Scholar
  52. Prinzie, P., Onghena, P., Hellinckx, W., Grietens, H., Ghesquiere, P., & Colpin, H. (2003). The additive and interactive effects of parenting and children’s personality on externalizing behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 17(2), 95–117.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.467.Google Scholar
  53. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–164.  https://doi.org/10.2307/271063.Google Scholar
  54. Reitman, D., Currier, R. O., Hupp, S. D., Rhode, P. C., Murphy, M. A., & O’Callaghan, P. M. (2001). Psychometric characteristics of the Parenting Scale in a head start population. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30(4), 514–524.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3004_08.Google Scholar
  55. Rhoades, K. A., & O’Leary, S. G. (2007). Factor structure and validity of the parenting scale. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36(2), 137–146.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410701274157.Google Scholar
  56. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.Google Scholar
  57. Salari, R., Terreros, C., & Sarkadi, A. (2012). Parenting Scale: which version should we use? Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34(2), 268–281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9281-x.Google Scholar
  58. Sanders, M. R. (1999). Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: towards an empirically validated multilevel parenting and family support strategy for the prevention of behavior and emotional problems in children. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2(2), 71–90.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021843613840.Google Scholar
  59. Sanders, M. R. (2012). Development, evaluation, and multinational dissemination of the Triple P-Positive parenting program. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 345–379.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143104.Google Scholar
  60. Sanders, M. R., & Woolley, M. L. (2005). The relationship between maternal self-efficacy and parenting practices: Implications for parent training child. Care, Health and Development, 31, 65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00487.x.Google Scholar
  61. Sandler, I., Schoenfelder, E., Wolchik, S., & MacKinnon, D. (2011). Long-term impact of prevention programs to promote effective parenting: lasting effects but uncertain processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 299–329.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annureev.psych.121208.131619.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111.  https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.12.1.102.Google Scholar
  63. Steele, R. G., Nesbitt-Daly, J. S., Daniel, R. C., & Forehand, R. (2005). Factor structure of the Parenting Scale in a low-income African American sample. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14(4), 535–549.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-005-7187-x.Google Scholar
  64. Stith, S. M., Liu, T., Davies, L. C., Boykin, E. L., Alder, M. C., Harris, J. M., & Dees, J. (2009). Risk factors in child maltreatment: a meta-analytic review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(1), 13–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.03.006.Google Scholar
  65. Waller, R., Gardner, F., Hyde, L. W., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2012). Do harsh and positive parenting predict parent reports of deceitful‐callous behavior in early childhood? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(9), 946–953.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.03.006.Google Scholar
  66. Webster-Stratton, C. (1998). Preventing conduct problems in Head Start children: strengthening parenting competencies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(5), 715–730.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.66.5.715.Google Scholar
  67. White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30(4), 377–399.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4067.Google Scholar
  68. Zhou, Q., Sandler, I. N., Millsap, R. E., Wolchik, S. A., & Dawson-McClure, S. R. (2008). Mother-child relationship quality and effective discipline as mediators of the 6-year effects of the new beginnings program for children from divorced families. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(4), 579–594.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.76.4.579.Google Scholar
  69. Zijlstra, W. P., van der Ark, L. A., & Sijtsma, K. (2011). Outliers in questionnaire data can they be detected and should they be removed? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 36(2), 186–212.  https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998610366263.Google Scholar
  70. Zijlstra, W. P., van der Ark, L. A., Andries, L., & Sijtsma, K. (2013). Discordancy tests for outlier detection in multi-item questionnaires. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 9(2), 69–77.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000056.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Criminological Research Institute of Lower SaxonyHannoverGermany
  2. 2.State Police College of Baden-WuerttembergVillingen-SchwenningenGermany
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyTechnical University of BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  4. 4.Faculty of Applied Human StudiesUniversity of Applied Sciences Magdeburg and StendalMagdeburgGermany
  5. 5.Department of Medical Psychology and Medical SociologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  6. 6.Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and PsychotherapyUniversity Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
  7. 7.ALPEN-ADRIA-UNIVERSITÄT KLAGENFURTKlagenfurt am WörtherseeAustria

Personalised recommendations