Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 10, pp 3345–3357 | Cite as

Effectiveness of a Universal Web-based Parenting Program to Promote Positive Parenting: Patterns and Predictors on Program Satisfaction

  • Arminda SuárezEmail author
  • Sonia Byrne
  • María José Rodrigo
Original Paper

Abstract

There is a need for effective and accessible web-based intervention strategy to promote positive parenting at a population level. We tested the effectiveness of the “Educar en Positivo” (“The Positive Parent”) program by the self-assignment of 148 Spanish-speaking parents to the modules (program group) and 164 parents to multimedia complementary material (visitor group). Both groups were automatically monitored for their daily parenting mood and online parental support via a standard questionnaire. Overall, the program spontaneously attracted mainly highly educated young mothers with young children. Results of a linear growth modeling showed a sustained progression in the daily mood measures of parental role satisfaction and confidence in parenting capacities in the program group. Pretest-posttest comparison in both groups showed significant improvements in the two types of measures only in the program group. Cluster analyses showed improvements in the daily mood but not in the standard measures of online support in 40% of participants (Clusters 1 and 2) as well as improvements involving a greater coherence across these measures in 60% of participants (Clusters 3 and 4). Participants in Clusters 3 and 4 reported greater satisfaction than participants in Clusters 1 and 2 with the program’s usability, content, and parenting impact. These results were modulated by the parents’ greater forum participation, use of a diary, and family-related commitments. The existence of asynchronies in the learning process and the relevance of implementation factors have research implications for the evaluation of universal online parenting programs.

Keywords:

Internet parenting intervention Patterns of individual change Daily parenting mood Online support Program implementation Program satisfaction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO), the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) under the Grants PSI2015-69971-R and EDU2012-38588.

Author Contributions:

A.S. designed and executed the study, assisted with the data analyses, and wrote the paper. S.B. collaborated with the data analyses and revised the paper. M.J.R Collaborated with the design of the study, with the data analyses, and wrote the paper.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Universidad de La Laguna (Spain) that provided IRB approval.

Informed Consent

Participants of the “Positive Parent” program were informed about the treatment of their personal data, according to the Ley de Protección de Datos de Carácter Personal, de 24 de mayo de 2018, ISBN: 978-84-340-2157-0.

References

  1. Álvarez, M., Rodrigo, M. J., & Byrne, S. (2016). What implementation components predict positive outcomes in aparenting program? Research on Social Work Practice, 28(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  2. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., McKenna, K. Y., & Tal, S. A. (2008). E-empowerment: empowerment by the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1776–1789.Google Scholar
  3. Baumeister, H., Reichler, L., Munzinger, M., & Lin, J. (2014). The impact of guidance on Internet-based mental health interventions—a systematic review. Internet Interventions, 1(4), 205–215.Google Scholar
  4. Bergman, L. R., Magnusson, D., & El Khouri, B. M. (2003). Studying individual Development in an Interindividual Context: A Person-oriented Approach. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011). Putting the pieces together: an integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12, 23–33.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady, E., & Guerin, S. (2010). Not the romantic, all happy, coochy coo experience: a qualitive analysis of interactions on an Irish parenting web site. Family Relations, 59, 14–27.Google Scholar
  7. Breitenstein, S. M., & Gross, D. (2013). We-based delivery of a preventive parent training intervention: A feasibility study. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 26(2), 149–157.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, S., Rodrigo, M. J., & Máiquez, M. L. (2014). Patterns of individual change in a parenting program for child maltreatment and their relation to family and professional environments. Child Abuse and Neglect, 3, 457–467.Google Scholar
  9. Byrnes, H. F., Miller, B. A., Aalborg, A. E., Plasencia, A. V., & Keagy, C. D. (2010). Implementation fidelity in adolescent family-based prevention programs: relationship to family engagement. Health Education Research, 25, 531–541.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan, A. H. N. (2008). Life in happy land: Using virtual space and doing motherhood in Hong Kong. Gender, Place and Culture-A Journal of Feminist Geography, 15, 169–188.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Coleman, P. K., & Karraker, K. H. (2003). Maternal self‐efficacy beliefs, competence in parenting, and toddlers’ behavior and developmental status. Infant Mental Health Journal, 24, 126–148.Google Scholar
  13. Council of Europe (2006), Recommendation (2006): 19 Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on policy to support positive parenting. Strasbourg, France: Author. https://search.coe.int/cm/Page/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805d6dda
  14. Daly, M. (2007). Parenting in contemporary Europe: a positive approach. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  15. Durlak, J., & DuPre, E. (2008). Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 3, 327–350.Google Scholar
  16. Dworkin, J., Connell, J., & Doty, J. (2013). A literature review of parents’ online behavior. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7, 1–12.Google Scholar
  17. Ebata, A., & Dennis, S. (2011). Family life education on the technological frontier. In S. F. Duncan & H. W.Goddard (Eds.), Family life education: Principles and practices for effective outreach (2nd ed.; pp. 236–262). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Elefant, A. B., Contreras, O., Muñoz, R. F., Bunge, E. L., & Leykin, Y. (2017). Microinterventions produce immediate but not lasting benefits in mood and distress. Internet interventions, 10, 17–22.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Erera, P. I., & Baum, N. (2009). Chat-room voices of divorced non-residential fathers. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 36, 63–83.Google Scholar
  20. Fletcher, R., & StGeorge, J. (2011). Heading into fatherhood—nervously: support for fathering from online dads. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 1101–1114.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughes, R., Bowers, J. R., Mitchell, E. T., Curtiss, S., & Ebata, A. T. (2012). Developing online family life prevention and education programs. Family Relations, 61, 711–727.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, T. L., & Prinz, R. J. (2005). Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: a review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 341–363.Google Scholar
  23. LaMendola, W., & Krysik, J. (2008). Design imperatives to enhance evidence-based interventions with persuasive technology: A case scenario in preventing child maltreatment. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 26, 397–422.Google Scholar
  24. Lomanowska, A. M., & Guitton, M. J. (2016). Online intimacy and well-being in the digital age. Internet Interventions, 4, 138–144.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Madge, C., & OʼConnor, H. (2006). Parenting gone wired: empowerment of new mothers on the internet? Social & Cultural Geography, 7, 199–220.Google Scholar
  26. Mayer, R. E. (2011). Does styles research have useful implications for educational practice? Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 319–320.Google Scholar
  27. McDaniel, B. T., Coyne, S. M., & Holmes, E. K. (2012). New mothers and media use: associations between blogging, social networking, and maternal well-being. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16, 1509–1517.Google Scholar
  28. Metzler, C. W., Sanders, M. R., Rusby, J. C., & Crowley, R. N. (2012). Using consumer preference information to increase the reach and impact of media-based parenting interventions in a public health approach to parenting support. Behavior Therapy, 43, 257–270.Google Scholar
  29. Moore, R. C., Depp, C. A., Wetherell, J. L., & Lenze, E. J. (2016). Ecological momentary assessment versus standard assessment instruments for measuring mindfulness, depressed mood, and anxiety among older adults. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 75, 116–123.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus statistical software. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  31. Muthén, L.K. & Muthén B.O. (1998–2011). Mplus User’s Guide. 6th Edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  32. Myers-Walls, J. A., & Dworkin, J. (2015). Parenting education without borders. Web-based Outreach. In J. J. Ponzetti (eds.), Evidence-based parenting education: a global perspective (pp. 123–139). New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Nathan, R. J., & Yeow, P. H. (2011). Crucial web usability factors of 36 industries for students: a large-scale empirical study. Electronic Commerce Research, 11, 151–180.Google Scholar
  34. Neve, M. J., Collins, C. E., & Morgan, P. J. (2010). Dropout, nonusage attrition, and pretreatment predictors of nonusage attrition in a commercial Web-based weight loss program. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12, e69.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Niela-Vilén, H., Axelin, A., Salanterä, S., & Melender, H. L. (2014). Internet-based peer support for parents: a systematic integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51, 1524–1537.Google Scholar
  36. Nieuwboer, C. C., Fukkink, R. G., & Hermanns, J. M. A. (2013a). Peer and professional parenting support on the Internet: a systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavioral and Social Networks, 16, 518–528.Google Scholar
  37. Nieuwboer, C. C., Fukkink, R. G., & Hermanns, J. M. A. (2013b). Online programs as tools to improve parenting: a meta-analytic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1823–1829.Google Scholar
  38. Plantin, L., & Daneback, K. (2009). Parenthood, information and support on the internet. A literature review of research on parents and professionals online. BMC Family Practice, 10, 34.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Ponzetti, J. J. (Ed.) (2016). Evidence-based parenting education: a global perspective. New York: Routledge..Google Scholar
  40. Ritterband, L. M., Thorndike, F. P., Cox, D. J., Kovatchev, B. P., & Gonder-Frederick, L. A. (2009). A behavior change model for internet interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 38, 18–27.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodrigo, M. J., Almeida, A., & Reichle, B. (2016). Evidence-Based Parent Education Programs: A European Perspective. In J. Ponzetti (Ed), Evidence-based parenting education: A global perspective (pp. 85–104). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Rodrigo, M. J., Byrne, S., & Álvarez, M. (2016). Interventions to Promote Positive Parenting in Spain. In M. Israelashvili & J. L. Romano (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of international prevention science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Russell, B. S., Maksut, J. L., Lincoln, C. R., & Leland, A. J. (2016). Computer-mediated parenting education: digital family service provision. Children and Youth Services Review, 62, 1–8.Google Scholar
  44. Sanders, J., Munford, R., Liebenberg, L., & Ungar, M. (2014). Consistent service quality: The connection between service quality, risk, resilience and outcomes for vulnerable youth clients of multiple services.Child Abuse and Neglect, 38, 687–697.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Sandler, I. N., Schoenfelder, E. N., Wolchik, S. A., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2010). Long-term impact of prevention programs to promote effective parenting: lasting effects but uncertain processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 299–329.Google Scholar
  46. Schwartz, S., Schultz, S., Reider, A., & Saunders, E. F. (2016). Daily mood monitoring of symptoms using smartphones in bipolar disorder: A pilot study assessing the feasibility of ecological momentary assessment. Journal of Affective Disorders, 191, 88–93.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Suárez, A., Byrne, S., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2016). Validación de la Escala de Apoyo Parental Online (EAPO). Revista Délelőtt Estudios e Investigación Enōsis Psicología York Educación, 3(1), 36–43.Google Scholar
  48. Suárez, A., Rodrigo, M. J., & Muñetón, M. (2016). Parental activities seeking online parenting support: Is there a digital skill divide? Revista de Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 54, 36–54.Google Scholar
  49. Suárez, A., Rodríguez, J. A., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2016). The Spanish online program “Educar en Positivo”(“The Positive Parent”): Whom does it benefit the most? Psychosocial Intervention, 25(2), 119–126.Google Scholar
  50. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th Edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  51. Torres, A., Suárez, A., Álvarez, M., Padilla, S., Rodríguez, E., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2015). Apoyo Parental Online. In M. J. Rodrigo, M. L. Máiquez, J. C. Martín, S. Byrne & B. Rodríguez (Eds.), Manual Práctico en Parentalidad Positiva (pp. 245–263). Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
  52. Torres, A., Suárez, A., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2014). Educar en Positivo: Primeros resultados y retos de futuro. Revista Iberoamericana Délelőtt Sistemas, Cibernética e Informática (RISCI), 11, 1–13.Google Scholar
  53. Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2009). Using experience sampling methods/Ecological Momentary Assessment (ESM/EMA) in clinical assessment and clinical research: Introduction to the Special Section. Psychological Assessment, 21, 457–462.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Valaitis, R. K., & Sword, W. A. (2005). Online discussions with pregnant and parenting adolescents: perspectives and possibilities. Health Promotion Practice, 6, 464–471.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arminda Suárez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sonia Byrne
    • 2
  • María José Rodrigo
    • 2
  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y HumanidadesUniversidad Internacional Isabel I de CastillaBurgosSpain
  2. 2.Facultad de PsicologíaInstituto Universitario de Neurociencias, Universidad de La Laguna, Campus de GuajaraLa Laguna, Santa Cruz de TenerifeSpain

Personalised recommendations