Cost-Effectiveness of Parent–Child Interaction Therapy in Clinics versus Homes: Client, Provider, Administrator, and Overall Perspectives
- 117 Downloads
Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is effective in decreasing negative child behaviors when delivered in clinics. Emerging research suggests that delivering PCIT in client homes can produce similar outcomes … but at what cost? Home PCIT still consumes valuable client time, but only for sessions. Home PCIT could reduce barriers to continued parent participation, and costs, by not requiring clients to spend time and money traveling to and from clinics. Home PCIT also does not require that parenting skills learned in clinics be generalized to homes. We assessed and compared costs of clinic and home PCIT at individual client and program levels of specificity from client and provider perspectives for 264 children and parents (clinic = 139, home = 125). We also included an administrator perspective and a client + provider + administrator = overall perspective. Multivariate analyses of covariance applied to imputed datasets found that, because significantly more sessions were held for PCIT delivered in homes than in clinics (a mean 18 versus 11 sessions, respectively), home PCIT cost significantly more from the overall perspective ($3913 versus $1821 per child receiving home versus clinic PCIT) and the provider perspective ($3326 versus $950 per child receiving home versus clinic PCIT), significantly less from the administrator perspective ($125 versus $397 per child receiving home versus clinic PCIT), and about the same from the client perspective ($352 versus $427 per child receiving home versus clinic PCIT). Cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) calculated for individual clients were significantly better for clinic PCIT from provider and overall perspectives but not from the administrator or client perspectives.
KeywordsParent–Child Interaction Therapy PCIT Costs Effectiveness Cost-effectiveness Stakeholder perspective
A.F.: designed and conducted data analyses for this study, supervised by B.Y. with input by T.F. A.F. and T.F. assisted B.Y. in writing and revising the manuscript.
This research was supported in part by Grant Number SM58493 from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Agency (SAMHSA) and administered by the State of Delaware’s Division of Prevention and Behavioral Health Services.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committees, i.e., Institutional Review Boards of both American University and the University of Delaware, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
This study was done with archival, deidentified clinical records. The American University IRB granted a waiver of consent to analyze these deidentified data.
- Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Bell, S., & Eyberg, S. M. (2002). Parent-child interaction therapy: A dyadic intervention for the treatment of young children with conduct problems. In L. VandeCreek, S. Knapp & T. L. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book 20, (57–74). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.Google Scholar
- Blomström, P., Ekman, M., Blomström Lundqvist, C., Calvert, M. J., Freemantle, N., & Lönnerholm, S., et al. (2008). Cost effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Nordic region: An analysis based on the CARE-HF trial. European Journal of Heart Failure, 10, 869–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.06.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chaffin, M., Silovsky, J. F., Funderburk, B., Valle, L. A., Brestan, E. V., & Balachova, T., et al. (2004). Parent-child interaction therapy with physically abusive parents: Efficacy for reducing future abuse reports. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 500–510.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- CityFeet. (2015, March 20). Search commercial property listings, zip code, select property type: “office” and “medical office.” http://www.cityfeet.com
- Colvin, A., Eyberg, S. M., & Adams, C. D. (1999). Restandardization of the eyberg child behavior inventory. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Child Study Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th edn. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Eyberg, S. M. (2004). The PCIT story part 1: Conceptual foundation. PCIT Pages: The Parent-Child Interaction Therapy Newsletter, 1, 1–2.Google Scholar
- Eyberg, S. M., & Funderburk, B. W., (2011). Parent-Child Interaction Therapy protocol. Gainesville, FL: PCIT International. http://www.pcit.org/store/p2/2011_PCIT_Protocol--MULTIPLE_LANGUAGES_AVAILABLE%21.html
- Eyberg, S. M., & Pincus, D. (1999). Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory & Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory-Revised. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Fernandez, M. A., & Eyberg, S. M. (2009). Predicting treatment and follow-up attrition in Parent-Child Interaction Therapy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 37, 431–441.Google Scholar
- Fowles, T. R., Masse, J. J., McGoron, K. L., Beveridge, R., Williamson, A., & Smith, M. S. (2018). Home-based vs. clinic-based Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT): Comparative effectiveness in the context of dissemination and implementation. Journal of Child and family Studies, 27, 1115–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0958-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ghosh, D., & Vogt, A. (2012). Outliers: An evaluation of methodologies. Joint Statistical Meetings (pp. 3455–3460). San Diego, CA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
- Glick, H. A., Doshi, J. A., Sonnad, S. S., & Polsky, D. (2015). Economic evaluation in clinical trial. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hanf, C., & Kling, J. (1973). Facilitating parent–child interaction: A two-stage training model. Portland, OR: University of Oregon Medical School. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Levin, H. M., & McEwan, P. J. (2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Loopnet. (2015, March 20). Search commercial property listings, zip code, select property type: “office” and “medical office.” http://www.loopnet.com
- MapQuest. (2015, April 21). Search distance between to zip codes. http://www.mapquest.com
- Neumann, P. J., Sanders, G. D., Russell, L. B., Siegel, J. E., & Ganiats, T. G. (2017). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Patterson, G. R. (1982). A social learning approach: 3. Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
- Sava, F. A., Yates, B. T., Lupu, V., Hatieganu, I., Szentagotai, A., & David, D. (2009). Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of cognitive therapy, rational emotive behavioral therapy, and fluoxetine (Prozac®) in treating depression: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 36–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015a). Online inflation calculator. http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm
- U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015b). Delaware - May 2014 OES State Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ecec_03112015.htm
- U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015c). Delaware - May 2014 OES State Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates. http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_de.htm#00-0000
- U.S. General Services Administration (2015). Search per diem rates for 2015. http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/100715
- Yates, B. T. (1980). Improving effectiveness and reducing costs in mental health. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
- Yates, B. T., Haven, W. G., & Thoresen, C. E. (1979). Cost-effectiveness analysis at Learning House: How much change for how much money? In J. S. Stumphauzer (Ed.), Progress in behavior therapy with delinquents (pp. 186–222). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar