Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 10, pp 3277–3287 | Cite as

Relational Permanence and Psychological well-being among African American Adolescents in Foster Care

  • Abigail Williams-ButlerEmail author
  • Joseph P. Ryan
  • Vonnie C. McLoyd
  • John E. Schulenberg
  • Pamela E. Davis-Kean
Original Paper

Abstract

The field of child welfare has historically focused on physical safety and legal permanency with little emphasis on child well-being or the importance of social relationships in positive youth development. We add to the literature regarding child well-being among African American adolescents in care—a group that is overrepresented within the foster care system. Specific attention is given to relational permanence—the concept of continuous supportive relationships marked by mutual trust and respect. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the prevalence of relational permanence and the change of relational permanence over time. Regression analyses were used to explain the variation associated with relational permanence and to investigate whether relational permanence predicts psychological well-being. The findings indicate that relational permanence varies at the start of foster care for African American adolescents. Yet, relational permanence did not significantly change over time. Maltreatment type had the largest influence on predicting the attainment of relational permanence over time (p < 0.05). Relational permanence was positively correlated with higher psychological well-being (p < 0.05). An increase in relational permanence over time also significantly predicted higher psychological well-being over time (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that social support from a variety of different sources aid youth in staying mentally healthy despite major disruptions in support from biological parents. These findings support the importance of developing a wide variety of social support networks to improve positive developmental outcomes among African American adolescents in foster care.

Keywords

African American youth Foster care Relational permanence Social support Adolescence 

Notes

Author Contributions

A.W.B.: designed and executed this study, conducted all data analyses, and wrote the paper. J.R. collaborated with the design and writing of the study. V.C. collaborated with the design and writing of the study. J.S. collaborated with the data analysis and editing of the final manuscript. P.D.K. collaborated in the editing of the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The University of Michigan provided IRB approval for this study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). A psychological study of the strange situation.. Oxford, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Avery, R. J., & Freundlich, M. (2009). You’re all grown up now: Termination of foster care support at age 18. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 247–257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beale Spencer, M., Harpalani, V., Cassidy, E., Jacobs, C. Y., Donde, S., Goss, T. N., Muñoz-Miller, M., Charles, N., & Wilson, S. (2015). Understanding vulnerability and resilience from a normative developmental perspective: implications for racially and ethnically diverse youth. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds), Developmental Psychopathology. pp. 627-672. 2nd Edn, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Belsky, J., & Fearon, R. M. (2002). Early attachment security, subsequent maternal sensitivity, and later child development: Does continuity in development depend upon continuity of caregiving? Attachment and Human Development, 4, 361–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Billingsley, A., & Giovannoni, J. M. (1972). Children of the storm. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  6. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Colby, S. L., & Ortman, J. M. (2015). Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060, current population reports, P25-1143. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, M. E., Spencer, R., & Ward, R. (2010). Supporting youth in transition from foster care: Formal and informal connections. Child Welfare, 89, 125–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Commodari, E. (2013). Preschool teacher attachment, school readiness and risk of learning difficulties. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Courtney, M. E., Dworsky, A., Brown, A., Cary, C., Love, K., & Vorhies, V. (2011). Midwest evaluation of adult functioning of former foster youth: Outcomes at age 26. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. Cushing, G., Samuels, G. M., & Kerman, B. (2014). Profiles of relational permanence at 22: Variability in parental supports and outcomes among young adults with foster care histories. Children and Youth Services Review, 39, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flynn, R. J., & Tessier, N. G. (2011). Promotive and risk factors as concurrent predictors of educational outcomes in supported transitional living: Extended care and maintenance in Ontario, Canada. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 2498–2503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Steele, H., Leigh, T., Kennedy, R., Mattoon, G., & Target, M. (1995). Attachment, the reflective self, and borderline states: The predictive specificity of the adult attachment interview and pathological emotional development. In S. Goldberg & J. Kerr (Eds.), Attachment theory: Social, developmental, and clinical perspectives (pp. 233–278). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Goemans, A., van Geel, M., & Vedder, P. (2015). Over three decades of longitudinal research on the development of foster children: A meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 42, 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grogan-Kaylor, A., Ruffalo, M. C., Ortega, R. M., & Clarke, J. (2008). Behaviors of youth involved in the child welfare system. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harden, B.J. (2004). Safety and stability for foster children: A developmental perspective. The Future of Children, 14, 30–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Haworth, C., Wright, M., Luciano, M., Martin, N., de Geus, E., Van Beijsterveldt, C., & Plomin, R. (2010). The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from childhood to young adulthood. Molecular Psychiatry, 15, 1112–1120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. James, S., Landsverk, J., & Slyman, D. (2004). Placement movement in and out-of-home-care. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johansson, H., & Hojer, I. (2012). Education for disadvantaged groups – structural and individual challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1135–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, L. (2014). The role of social support in the transition from foster care to emerging adulthood. Journal of Family Social Work, 17, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kisiel, C. L., Fehrenbach, T., Torgersen, E., Stolbach, B., McClelland, G., Griffin, G., & Burkman, K. (2014). Constellations of interpersonal trauma and symptoms in child welfare: Implications for a developmental trauma framework. Journal of Family Violence, 29, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laible, D. J., Carlo, G., & Raffaelli, M. (2000). The differential relations of parent and peer attachment to adolescent adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyons, J. S. (2009). Communimetrics: A communication theory of measurement in human service settings. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McLoyd, V. C. (1998). Changing demographics in the American population: Implications for research on minority children and adolescents. In V. C. McLoyd & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Studying minority adolescents (pp. 3–28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Mota, C. P., & Matos, P. M. (2015). Adolescents in institutional care: Significant adults, resilience and well-being. Child & Youth Care Forum, 44, 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Munson, M. R., & McMillen, J. C. (2009). Natural mentoring and psychosocial outcomes among older youth transitioning from foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 104–111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Nesmith, A., & Christophersen, K. (2014). Smoothing the transition to adulthood: Creating ongoing supportive relationships among foster youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 37, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Osgood, D. W., Foster, E. M., & Courtney, M. E. (2010). Vulnerable populations and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20, 209–229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rhodes, J. E., Spencer, R., Keller, T. E., Liang, B., & Noam, G. (2006). A model for the influence of mentoring relationships on youth development. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 691–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rholes, W. S., & Simpson, J. A. (2004). Attachment theory: Basic concepts and contemporary questions. In W. S. Rholes & J. A. Simposn (Eds.), Adult Attachment. pp. 3-14. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rolock, N., & White, K. R. (2016). Post-permanency discontinuity: A longitudinal examination of outcomes for foster youth after adoption or guardianship. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rubin, D. M., O’Reilly, A. L. R., Luan, X., & Localio, A. R. (2007). The impact of placement stability on behavioral well-being for children in foster care. Pediatrics, 119, 336–344.Google Scholar
  33. Rutman, D., & Hubberstey, C. (2016). Is anybody there? Informal supports accessed and sought by youth from foster care. Children and Youths Services Review, 63, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryan, J. P., Herz, D., Hernandez, P. M., & Marshall, J. M. (2007). Maltreatment and delinquency: Investigating child welfare bias in juvenile justice processing. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 1035–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryan, J. P., & Testa, M. F. (2005). Child maltreatment and juvenile delinquency: Investigating the role of placement and placement instability. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Samuels, G. M. (2008). A reason, a season, or a lifetime: Relational permanence among young adults with foster care backgrounds. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  37. Shook, J., Goodkind, S., Pohlig, R. T., Schelbe, L., Herring, D., & Kim, K. H. (2011). Patterns of mental health, substance abuse, and justice involvement among youth aging out of child welfare. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81, 420–432.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, W. B. (2011). Youth leaving foster care: A developmental, relationship-based approach to practice.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, C. J., & Devore, W. (2004). African American children in the child welfare and kinship system: from exclusion to over inclusion. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smithgall, C., Jarpe-Ratner, E., Yang, D., DeCoursey, J., Brooks, L., & George, R. (2008). Family assessment in child welfare: The integrated assessment program in policy and practice.. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  41. Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E., & Collins, W. A. (2005). The development of the person: The Minnesota study of risk and adaptation from birth to adulthood. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  42. Stott, T., & Gustavsson, N. (2010). Balancing permanency and stability for youth in foster care. Children and Youth Services, 32, 619–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thompson, A. E., Greeson, J. K. P., & Brunsink, A. M. (2016). Natural mentoring among older youth in and aging out of foster care: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services, 61, 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Towbin, K. E., & Showalter, J. E. (2008). Adolescent development. In A. Tasman, J. Kay, J. A. Lieberman, M. B. First & M. Maj (Eds.), Psychiatry. pp. 161-180. 3rd edn, Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Travis, L. A., Bliwise, N. G., Binder, J. L., & Horne-Moyer, H. L. (2001). Changes in clients’ attachment styles over the course of time-limited dynamic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. US Department of Health and Human Services. (2015). The AFCARS report. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/afcarsreport22.pdf
  47. Vranceanu, A., Hobfoll, S., & Johnson, R. J. (2007). Child multi-type maltreatment and associated depression and PTSD symptoms: The role of social support and stress. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31, 71–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Walsh, A. M. (2015). Legal permanency isn’t everything: Readdressing the need for well-being indicators in child protection courts. Family Court Review, 53, 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Washington, T., Gleeson, J. P., & Rulison, K. L. (2013). Competence and African American children in informal kinship care: The role of family. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1305–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Washington, T., Cryer-Coupet, Q., Coakley, T. M., Labban, J., Gleeson, J. P., & Shears, J. (2014). Examining maternal and paternal involvement as promotive factors of competence in African American children in informal kinship care. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Waters, E., Merrick, S., Treboux, D., Crowell, J., & Albersheirn, L. (2000). Attachment security in infancy and early adulthood: A twenty-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 71, 684–689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Weinfield, N. S., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2000). Attachment from infancy to early adulthood in a high-risk sample: Continuity, discontinuity, and their correlates. Child Development, 71, 695–702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wills, T. A., & Shinar, O. (2000). Measuring perceived and received social support. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 86–135). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wong, C. A., & Rowley, S. (2001). The schooling of ethnic minority children: Commentary. Educational Psychologist, 36, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zimmerman, M. A., Stoddard, S. A., Eisman, A. B., Caldwell, C. H., Aiyer, S. M., & Miller, A. (2013). Adolescent resilience: Promotive factors that inform prevention. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.University of MichiganAnn AborUSA

Personalised recommendations