Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 9, pp 2797–2810 | Cite as

Development and Cross-Cultural Validity of a Brief Measure of Separation-Individuation

  • C. C. Chen
  • G. B. Richardson
  • M. H. C. Lai
  • C. L. Dai
  • D. G. Hays
Original Paper
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

Separation from parents is a key aspect of adolescent development and has been linked to a variety of important mental and behavioral health outcomes. Separation-individuation measures were developed in the United States and have been used in Asian contexts. However, no cross-cultural studies have demonstrated that measures of separation-individuation tap the same domains across Asian and American adolescents. This article describes two studies conducted to develop and initially validate a scale for measuring adolescent separation-individuation. Study 1 (n= 300) developed a Brief Measure of Separation-Individuation (BMSI) using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory. The result was a 32-item BMSI that provided comparable test information to the original 148-item measure. Study 2 examined the BMSI for measurement invariance and convergent validity across U.S. and Taiwanese samples (ns = 231 and 323). Findings suggest that functional independence, attitudinal independence, and emotional independence may be culturally invariant separation-individuation constructs. However, conflictual independence seems to be more culturally dependent in that its items were only partially scalar invariant and it was only loosely related to the other separation-individuation factors. Findings are consistent with previous research that recommended against using total scores for the PSI (i.e., scoring a single separation-individuation dimension). This study suggests the BMSI holds promise as a brief measure of separation-individuation that can be used in cross-cultural research.

Keywords

Individuation Cross-cultural validity Parent-child relationship Item response theory Adolescent 

Notes

Author Contributions

C.C.: designed and executed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. G.R.: collaborated with the design, analyzing the data, and writing of the study. M.L.: collaborated with analyzing the data and wrote part of the results. C.D.: collaborated with data collection and writing of the study. D.H.: collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Cincinnati Institutional Review Board (Ref No: 2015-0961).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10826_2018_1140_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (522 kb)
Supplementary Information

References

  1. Beyers, W., Goossens, L., Vansant, I., & Moors, E. (2003). A structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boucher, H. C., & Maslach, C. (2009). Culture and individuation: the role of norms and self-construals. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 677–693.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chao, R., & Tseng, V. (2002). Parenting of Asians. In M. H. Bornstein (Series Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Social conditions and applied parenting. 2nd ed. (pp. 59–93). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, C. C. (2009). Separation-individuation, perceived parental control and filial piety in the Asian culture (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hualien, Taiwan:National Dong Hwa University.Google Scholar
  8. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choi, K. H. (2002). Psychological separation-individuation and adjustment to college among Korean American students: the roles of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 468–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory.. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  12. Delhaye, M., Kempenaers, C., Burton, J., Linkowski, P., Stroobants, R., & Goossens, L. (2012). Attachment, parenting, and separation-individuation in adolescence: A comparison of hospitalized adolescents, institutionalized adolescents, and controls. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 173, 119–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Downing, H. M., & Nauta, M. M. (2010). Separation-individuation, exploration, and identity diffusion as mediators of the relationship between attachment and career indecision. Journal of Career Development, 36, 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dundes, L., Cho, E., & Kwak, S. (2009). The duty to succeed: honor versus happiness in college and career choices of East Asian students in the United States. Pastoral Care in Education, 27, 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dzukaeva, V. (2014). Adaptation of Psychological Separation Inventory (PSI) for Russian sample. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 146, 216–221.Google Scholar
  16. Hair, Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Haws, W. A., & Mallinckrodt, B. (1998). Separation-individuation from family of origin and marital adjustment of recently married couples. American Journal of Family Therapy, 26, 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. He, S., Xin, X., Li, J., Hua, S., & Hu, W. (2014). The relationship between family cohesion and freshmen’s adjustment to college: The mediating effect of separation-individuation. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 5, 87–96.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman, J. A. (1984). Psychological separation of late adolescents from their parents. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeon, H. O. (2012). Relationship of psychological separation, depression and antidepressive coping behaviors in university students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 13(6), 2655–2663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kenny, M. E. (1987). The extent and function of parental attachment among first-year college students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 17–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Koepke, S., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2012). Dynamics of identity development and separation-individuation in parent-child relationships during adolescence and emerging adulthood: A conceptual integration. Developmental Review, 32(1), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kroger, J. (1998). Adolescence as a second separation–individuation process: Critical review of an objectrelations approach. In E. E. A. Skoe & A. L. v. d. Lippe (Eds.), Personality development in adolescence: Across-national and life span perspective. (pp. 172–192). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Lapsley, D. K., Aalsma, M. C., & Varshney, N. M. (2001). A factor analytic and psychometric examination of pathology of separation-individuation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 915–932.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Levine, J., Green, C., & Millon, T. (1986). The separation-individuation test of adolescence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 123–137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu, W. C. (2005). Contents and measurements of “Multi-individuation” process for adolescents in parent child relationship. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 18, 55–92.Google Scholar
  29. Mahler, M., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (2000). The psychological birth of the human infant: symbiosis and individuation.. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Marsden, P., Meyer, C., Fuller, M., & Waller, G. D. (2002). The relationship between eating psychopathology and separation-individuation in young nonclinical women. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190, 710–713.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mattanah, J. F., Brand, B. L., & Hancock, G. R. (2004). Parental attachment, separation-individuation, and college student adjustment: a structural equation analysis of mediational effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meeus, W., Iedema, J., Maassen, G., & Engels, R. (2005). Separation-individuation revisited: on the interplay of parent-adolescent relations, identity and emotional adjustment in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 89–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance.. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Pohlmann, J. T. (2004). Use and interpretation of factor analysis in The Journal of Educational Research: 1992–2002. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 14–23.  https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.1.14-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  36. Rice, K. G. (1992). Separation-individuation and adjustment to college: a longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rice, K. G., Cole, D. A., & Lapsley, D. K. (1990). Separation-individuation, family cohesion, and adjustment to college: measurement validation and test of a theoretical model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Samejima, F. (1996). The graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–101). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Schwartz, S. J., Côté, J., & Arnett, J. J. (2005). Identity and agency in emerging adulthood: two developmental routes in the individualization process. Youth & Society, 37, 201–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sevda, A. (2010). The relation between attachment and personal and social adjustment mediated by separation-individuation. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4048–4053.Google Scholar
  42. Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: a theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240–275.  https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719502900302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sivadas, E., Bruvold, N. T., & Nelson, M. R. (2008). A reduced version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale: a four-country assessment. Journal of Business Research, 61, 201–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stey, P., Hill, P., & Lapsley, D. (2014). Factor structure and psychometric properties of a brief measure of dysfunctional individuation. Assessment, 21, 452–462.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tam, W. C., Shiah, Y. J., & Chiang, S. K. (2003). Chinese version of the separation-individuation inventory. Psychological Reports, 93, 291–299.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas, S. A., Hoste, R. R., & Le Grange, D. (2012). Observed connection and individuation: relation to symptoms in families of adolescents with bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 45, 891–899.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tokar, D. M., Withrow, J. R., Hall, R. J., & Moradi, B. (2003). Psychological separation, attachment security, vocational self-concept crystallization, and career indecision: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118–128.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018
Corrected publication June 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Nevada, Las VegasLas VegasUSA
  2. 2.University of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations