Parents’ Perceptions of their Acceptance and Rejection Behaviors: Benchmarking Spain and Ecuador
Cross-cultural studies are necessary to test and understand how measures work in diverse multicultural societies. Positive parenting needs to be defined and the basic elements making up this construct need to be established. IPARTheory stands out as the main theory defining parenting focusing on the acceptance-rejection dimension. This study explored the factorial structure of the PARQ Questionnaire Parent Version (Short Form) in Spanish (n = 4169), with age range 20 to 72 years old; and Ecuadorian (n = 569) parents, with ages from 22 to 71 years old. This instrument assesses parents’ perceptions of their acceptance and rejection behaviors towards their children. The questionnaire has a 25-item structure in four scales: warmth-affection, hostility/aggression, indifference/neglect and undifferentiated-rejection. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the four-factor model in both samples, however the invariance of the model must be accepted with caution. In addition, an ANOVA test showed statistically significative differences in the four factors between Spanish and Ecuadorian parents. Spain and Ecuador are both Latin countries; however, there are differences between them, which may explain the differences found in this research. Authorities must encourage programs and social services to educate people in parental roles and tasks, besides public policies are needed to support positive parenting, but it is important to define the domains which make this construct.
KeywordsCross-cultural issues Parenting Quantitative methodology Parental acceptance-rejection questionnaire Parent version
We gratefully acknowledge the permission of R. P. Rohner and M.A. Carrasco to adapt the instrument for the Spanish and Ecuadorian populations. This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Institutional Review Board from Schools Involved (Spain) and University of Cuenca (Ecuador).
STL: conceived the study including methodological design, also participant recruitment, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data, and wrote the manuscript. MDPM: participant recruitment and data collection. JCMO: data collection. JVPC: participant recruitment, collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript. MIC: conceived the study including methodological design, also participant recruitment, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data, and wrote the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Ali, S., Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R. P. (2015). Pancultural gender differences in the relation between perceived parental acceptance and psychological adjustment of children and adult offspring: a meta-analytic review of worldwide research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 1059–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Becoña, E., Martínez, U., Calafat, A., Juan, M., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., & Secades-Villa, R. (2013). Parental styles and drug use: a review. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 19, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Center for Parenting and Research. (2006). Effective parenting capacity assessment: key issues. Disponible en http://www.community.nsw.gov.au/docswr/_assets/main/documents/researchnotes_parenting_keyissues.pdf Consejo. Accessed 13 Apr 2018.
- Consejo de Europa (2006). Recomendación REC (2006) 19 del Comité de Ministros sobre políticas de apoyo a la parentalidad positiva. Estrasburgo: Consejo de Europa.Google Scholar
- Drasgow, F., & Probst, T. (2012). The psychometrics of adaptation: evaluating measurement equivalence across languages and cultures. En R. Hambleton, P. Merenda, & Ch. Spielberger. Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cutural assessment (pp. 265–296). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Fernández García, C. M., Peña Calvo, J. V., & Rodríguez Menéndez, M. C. (2017). Parental control in interpersonal acceptance-rejection theory: a study with a Spanish sample using Parents’ Version of Parental Acceptation-Rejection/Control Questionnaire. Anales Délelőtt Psicología, 33(3), 652–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Merenda, P. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation of educational and psychological testing. En R. Hambelton, P. Merenda, & Ch. Spielberger. Adapting educational psychologcial tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 321–342). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Moreno, E. (2010). Políticas de infancia y parentalidad positiva en el marco europeo. Papeles Salmantinos Délelőtt Educación, 14, 17–28. http://summa.upsa.es/pdf.raw?query=id:0000030627&page=1&lang=es.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide. 7th ed Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Oliva, A. (2006). Relaciones familiares y desarrollo adolescente. Anuario Délelőtt Psicología, 37(3), 209–223.Google Scholar
- Oliva, A., Jiménez, J. M., Parra, A., & Sánchez-Queija, I. (2008). Acontecimientos vitales estresantes, resiliencia y ajuste adolescente. Revista Délelőtt Psicopatología York Psicología Clínica, 13(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
- Putnick, D., Bornestein, M. H., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Deater-Deckard, K., Di Giunta, L., & Bombi, A. S. (2012). Agreement in mother and father acceptance-rejection, warmth, and hostility/rejection/neglect of children across nine countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(3), 191–223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rohner, R. P. (1975). They love me, they love me not; a worldwide study of the effects of parental acceptance-rejection. New Haven, CT: HRAF.Google Scholar
- Rohner, R. P. (2005). Parental acceptance-rejection questionnaire (PA RQ): Test Manual. In R P. Rohner, A. Khaleque, (eds.) Handbook for the Study of Parental Acceptance and Rejection. (pp. 43–106). Storrs: Rohner Research Publications.Google Scholar
- Rohner, R. P. (2014). PARTheory gests a new name: interpersonal Acceptance Rejection Theory (IPARTheroy). ISIPAR Newletter, 8, 1–17. http://www.isipar.org/3.html.Google Scholar
- Rohner, R. P. (2016). Introduction to Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection Theory (IPARTheory) and Evidence. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1055.
- Rohner, R. P., & Carrasco, M. A. (2004). PARENT PARQ/Control. Unplished version. http://www.isipar.org/. Accessed 26 Jun 2017.
- Rohner, R. P., & Khaleque, A. (2002). Parental acceptance-rejection and life span development: a universalist perspective. Online Readings in Pyschology and Cultural, 6(1) Berkeley: The Berkeley Electronic Press.Google Scholar
- Rohner, R.P., & Khaleque, A. (2005). Handbook for the study of parental acceptance and rejection. Storrs: Rohner Research Publications.Google Scholar
- Rohner, R. P., Khaleque, A., & Cournoyer, D. E. (2005). Parental acceptance-rejection: theory, methods, cross-cultural evidence, and implications. Ethos (Berkeley, California), 33(3), 299–334.Google Scholar
- Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C., & Turner, M. T. (2003). Theoretical, scientific and Clinical Foundations of Tripe P-Positive Parenting Program: a population approach to the promotion of parenting competence. Parenting Research and Practice Monograph, 1. University of Queensland. Australia: Parenting and Family Support Centre.Google Scholar
- Tur, A. M., Mestre, V., Samper, P., & Malonda, E. (2012). Crianza y agresividad de los menores: ¿Es diferente la influencia del padre y de la madre? Psicothema, 24(2), 284–298.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. (2013). Preventing violence: Evaluating outcomes of parenting programmes. Luxembourg: World Health Organization.Google Scholar