Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 9, pp 3019–3026 | Cite as

Parents’ Perceptions of their Acceptance and Rejection Behaviors: Benchmarking Spain and Ecuador

  • Susana Torío-López
  • María-Dolores Palacios-Madero
  • Janeth-Catalina Mora-Oleas
  • José-Vicente Peña-Calvo
  • Mercedes Inda-Caro
Original Paper

Abstract

Cross-cultural studies are necessary to test and understand how measures work in diverse multicultural societies. Positive parenting needs to be defined and the basic elements making up this construct need to be established. IPARTheory stands out as the main theory defining parenting focusing on the acceptance-rejection dimension. This study explored the factorial structure of the PARQ Questionnaire Parent Version (Short Form) in Spanish (n = 4169), with age range 20 to 72 years old; and Ecuadorian (n = 569) parents, with ages from 22 to 71 years old. This instrument assesses parents’ perceptions of their acceptance and rejection behaviors towards their children. The questionnaire has a 25-item structure in four scales: warmth-affection, hostility/aggression, indifference/neglect and undifferentiated-rejection. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the four-factor model in both samples, however the invariance of the model must be accepted with caution. In addition, an ANOVA test showed statistically significative differences in the four factors between Spanish and Ecuadorian parents. Spain and Ecuador are both Latin countries; however, there are differences between them, which may explain the differences found in this research. Authorities must encourage programs and social services to educate people in parental roles and tasks, besides public policies are needed to support positive parenting, but it is important to define the domains which make this construct.

Keywords

Cross-cultural issues Parenting Quantitative methodology Parental acceptance-rejection questionnaire Parent version 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the permission of R. P. Rohner and M.A. Carrasco to adapt the instrument for the Spanish and Ecuadorian populations. This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Institutional Review Board from Schools Involved (Spain) and University of Cuenca (Ecuador).

Author Contribution

STL: conceived the study including methodological design, also participant recruitment, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data, and wrote the manuscript. MDPM: participant recruitment and data collection. JCMO: data collection. JVPC: participant recruitment, collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript. MIC: conceived the study including methodological design, also participant recruitment, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data, and wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ali, S., Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R. P. (2015). Pancultural gender differences in the relation between perceived parental acceptance and psychological adjustment of children and adult offspring: a meta-analytic review of worldwide research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 1059–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aunola, K., Stattin, H., & Nurmi, J. (2000). The role of parenting styles in children’s problem behavior. Child Development, 76, 1144–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bahr, S. J., & Hoffman, J. P. (2010). Parenting style, religiosity, peers, and adolescent heavy drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and drugs, 71, 539–543.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Becoña, E., Martínez, U., Calafat, A., Juan, M., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., & Secades-Villa, R. (2013). Parental styles and drug use: a review. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 19, 1–10.Google Scholar
  5. Calafat, A., García, F., Juan, M., Becoña, E., & Fernández-Hermida, J. R. (2014). Which parenting styles is more protective against adolescent substance use? Evidence within the European context. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 138, 185–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Center for Parenting and Research. (2006). Effective parenting capacity assessment: key issues. Disponible en http://www.community.nsw.gov.au/docswr/_assets/main/documents/researchnotes_parenting_keyissues.pdf Consejo. Accessed 13 Apr 2018.
  7. Cerezo, M. T., Casanova, P. F., De la Torre, M. J., & Carpio, M. V. (2011). Estilos educativos paternos y estrategias de aprendizaje en alumnos de educación secundaria. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 4, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Consejo de Europa (2006). Recomendación REC (2006) 19 del Comité de Ministros sobre políticas de apoyo a la parentalidad positiva. Estrasburgo: Consejo de Europa.Google Scholar
  9. Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: an integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 487–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Del Barrio, V., Ramírez-Uclés, I., Romero, C., & Carrasco, M. A. (2014). Adaptación del Child-PARQ/Control: versiones para el padre y la madre en población infantil y adolescente española. Acción Psicológica, 11(2), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drasgow, F., & Probst, T. (2012). The psychometrics of adaptation: evaluating measurement equivalence across languages and cultures. En R. Hambleton, P. Merenda, & Ch. Spielberger. Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cutural assessment (pp. 265–296). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fernández García, C. M., Peña Calvo, J. V., & Rodríguez Menéndez, M. C. (2017). Parental control in interpersonal acceptance-rejection theory: a study with a Spanish sample using Parents’ Version of Parental Acceptation-Rejection/Control Questionnaire. Anales Délelőtt Psicología, 33(3), 652–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuentes, M. C., García, F., Gracia, E., & Alarcón, A. (2015). Los estilos parentales de socialización y el ajuste psicológico. Un estudio con adolescentes españoles. Revista Délelőtt Psicodidáctica, 20(1), 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gómez, R., & Rohner, R. (2011). Tests of factor structure and measurment invariance in the United States and Australia using the adult versión of the parental acceptance-rejection questionnaire. Cross-Cultural Research, 45(3), 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Im-Bolter, N., Zadeh, Z., & Ling, D. (2013). Early parenting beliefs and academic achievement: the mediating role of language. Early Child Development and Care, 183, 1811–1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R. P. (2002). Perceived parental acceptance-rejection and psychological adjustement: a meta-analysis of cross-cultural and intracultural studies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. León del Barco, B., Castaño, F., Polo del Río, M., & Fajardo-Bullón, F. (2015). Aceptación-rechazo parental y perfiles de victimización y agresión en situaciones de bullying. Anales Délelőtt Psicología, 31(2), 600–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Merenda, P. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation of educational and psychological testing. En R. Hambelton, P. Merenda, & Ch. Spielberger. Adapting educational psychologcial tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 321–342). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  19. Milevsky, A., Schlechter, M., Netter, S., & Keehn, D. (2007). Maternal and paternal parenting styles in adolescents: associations with self-esteem, depression and life-satisfaction. Journal of Child and family Studies, 16, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moreno, E. (2010). Políticas de infancia y parentalidad positiva en el marco europeo. Papeles Salmantinos Délelőtt Educación, 14, 17–28. http://summa.upsa.es/pdf.raw?query=id:0000030627&page=1&lang=es.Google Scholar
  21. Mounts, N. S., & Steinberg, L. (1995). An ecological analysis of peer influence on adolescent grade point average and drug use. Developmental Psychology, 31, 915–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide. 7th ed Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  23. Oliva, A. (2006). Relaciones familiares y desarrollo adolescente. Anuario Délelőtt Psicología, 37(3), 209–223.Google Scholar
  24. Oliva, A., Jiménez, J. M., Parra, A., & Sánchez-Queija, I. (2008). Acontecimientos vitales estresantes, resiliencia y ajuste adolescente. Revista Délelőtt Psicopatología York Psicología Clínica, 13(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
  25. Pelegrina, S., García, M. C., & Casanova, P. F. (2002). Los estilos educativos de los padres y la competencia académica de los adolescentes. Infancia York Aprendizaje, 25, 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Putnick, D., Bornestein, M. H., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Deater-Deckard, K., Di Giunta, L., & Bombi, A. S. (2012). Agreement in mother and father acceptance-rejection, warmth, and hostility/rejection/neglect of children across nine countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(3), 191–223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodríguez, M., Carrasco, M. A., & Holgado-Tello, F. P. (2016). Contribución de la aceptación-rechazo materno y paterno al ajuste psicológico de los hijos: diferencias entre población clínica y general. Revista Délelőtt Psicopatología York Psicología Clínica, 21, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rohner, R. P. (1975). They love me, they love me not; a worldwide study of the effects of parental acceptance-rejection. New Haven, CT: HRAF.Google Scholar
  29. Rohner, R. P. (2005). Parental acceptance-rejection questionnaire (PA RQ): Test Manual. In R P. Rohner, A. Khaleque, (eds.) Handbook for the Study of Parental Acceptance and Rejection. (pp. 43–106). Storrs: Rohner Research Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Rohner, R. P. (2014). PARTheory gests a new name: interpersonal Acceptance Rejection Theory (IPARTheroy). ISIPAR Newletter, 8, 1–17. http://www.isipar.org/3.html.Google Scholar
  31. Rohner, R. P. (2016). Introduction to Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection Theory (IPARTheory) and Evidence. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 6(1).  https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1055.
  32. Rohner, R. P., & Carrasco, M. A. (2004). PARENT PARQ/Control. Unplished version. http://www.isipar.org/. Accessed 26 Jun 2017.
  33. Rohner, R. P., & Carrasco, M. A. (2014). Teoría de la aceptación-rechazo interpersonal (IPARTheory): bases conceptuales, método y evidencia empírica. Acción Psicológica, 11(2), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rohner, R. P., & Khaleque, A. (2002). Parental acceptance-rejection and life span development: a universalist perspective. Online Readings in Pyschology and Cultural, 6(1) Berkeley: The Berkeley Electronic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rohner, R.P., & Khaleque, A. (2005). Handbook for the study of parental acceptance and rejection. Storrs: Rohner Research Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Rohner, R., & Khaleque, A. (2010). Testing central postulates of parental acceptance-rejection theory (PARTheory): a meta-analysis of cross-cultural studies. Journal of Familiy Theory & Review, 2, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rohner, R. P., Khaleque, A., & Cournoyer, D. E. (2005). Parental acceptance-rejection: theory, methods, cross-cultural evidence, and implications. Ethos (Berkeley, California), 33(3), 299–334.Google Scholar
  38. Rohner, R. P., Khaleque, A., & Cournoyer, D. E. (2012). Introduction to parental acceptance-rejection theory, methods, evidence, and implications. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C., & Turner, M. T. (2003). Theoretical, scientific and Clinical Foundations of Tripe P-Positive Parenting Program: a population approach to the promotion of parenting competence. Parenting Research and Practice Monograph, 1. University of Queensland. Australia: Parenting and Family Support Centre.Google Scholar
  40. Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S., Dornbusch, S., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievemen: authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266–1281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Suldo, S. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2004). The role of life satisfaction in the relationship between authoritative parenting dimensions and adolescent problem behavior. Social Indicators Research, 66, 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tur, A. M., Mestre, V., Samper, P., & Malonda, E. (2012). Crianza y agresividad de los menores: ¿Es diferente la influencia del padre y de la madre? Psicothema, 24(2), 284–298.Google Scholar
  43. Vargas-Rubilar, J., & Arán-Filippetti, V. (2014). Importancia de la parentalidad para el desarrollo cognitivo infantil: una revisión teórica. Revista Latinoamericana Délelőtt Ciencias Sociales, Niñez York Juventud, 12(1), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. World Health Organization. (2013). Preventing violence: Evaluating outcomes of parenting programmes. Luxembourg: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OviedoOviedoSpain
  2. 2.University of CuencaCuencaEcuador
  3. 3.National University of Ecuador (UNAE)CuencaEcuador

Personalised recommendations