Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 9, pp 2999–3007 | Cite as

Family Socio-Economic Status and Parent-Child Relationships Are Associated with the Social Creativity of Elementary School Children: The Mediating Role of Personality Traits

  • Dongjing Zhang
  • Zongkui Zhou
  • Chuanhua Gu
  • Yuju Lei
  • Cuiying Fan
Original Paper
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

Based on a sample of 955 elementary school children in central China, the present study examined family socio-economic status and parent-child relationships in relation to children’s social creativity, as well as the mediating role of personality traits in these associations. Family environment (socio-economic status and parent-child relationships) and personality traits were significantly correlated with social creativity; children openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness and extraversion partly mediated the relationship between family environment and social creativity when controlling for age and sex. These results are important for explaining the roles of the family environment and individual factors in shaping children’s social creativity.

Keywords

Social creativity Family socio-economic status Parent-child relationship Personality trait Elementary school children 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Major Program of the National Social Science Foundation of P.R. China [11&ZD151], self-determined research Funds of Central China Normal University from the colleges’ determined research operation of MOE (CCNU16JCZX11 & CCNU15A02056), State Scholarship Fund organized by China Scholarship Council (201706775076), and the Research Program Funds of the Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality at Beijing Normal University(2016-04-003-BZK01). We also acknowledge the support of Katherine Kitzmann in preparing the manuscript.

Author Contributions:

D.Z.: designed and executed the study, assisted with the data analyses, and wrote the paper. Z.Z.: collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript. C.G.: assisted with the data analyses, collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript. Y.L. and C.F.: analyzed the data and wrote part of the results.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of intersts.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Central China Normal University had provided IRB approval for the study.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. An, Y. Y., Wu, X. C., Liu, C. H., & Lin, C. D. (2013). Neuroticism personality and posttraumatic growth in adolescent: The moderating effect of coping style and mediating effect of social support. Psychological Development and Education, 6, 657–663.Google Scholar
  2. Andres, F., Castanier, C., & Le, S. C. (2014). Attachment and alcohol use amongst athletes: the mediating role of conscientiousness and alexithymia. Addictive Behaviors, 39(2), 487–490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ackerman, B. P., Brown, E. D., & Izard, C. E. (2004). The relations between persistent poverty and contextual risk and children’s behavior in elementary school. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 367–377.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, J. C. (2012). The system-stabilizing role of identity management strategies: social creativity can undermine collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 647–662.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchnan, C. M., Maccoby, E. E., & Dornbush, S. M. (1991). Caught between parents: Adolescents’ experience in divorced homes. Child Development, 62, 1008–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carvalho, R. G. G. (2016). Gender differences in academic achievement: the mediating role of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 54–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conger, K. J., Rueter, M. A., & Conger, R. D. (2000). The role of economic pressure in the lives of parentsand their adolescents: The family stress model. In L. J. Crockett & R. K. Silbereisen (Eds.), Negoti-ating adolescence in times of social change (pp. 201–223). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Conger, R. D., Ge, X., Elder, Jr, G. H., Lorenz, F. O., & Simons, R. L. (2010). Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents. Child Development, 65(2), 541–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conger, R. D., Wallace, L. E., Sun, Y., Simons, R. L., Mcloyd, V. C., & Brody, G. H. (2002). Economic pressure in african american families: a replication and extension of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 179–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, W., Niu, G. F., Zhang, D. J., Fan, C. Y., Tian, Y., & Zhou, Z. K. (2016). Socioeconomic status and life satisfaction in Chinese adolescents: Analysis of self-esteem as a mediator and optimism as a moderator. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chesnokova, O., & Subbotsky, E. (2014). Social creativity in primary-school children: How to measure, develop and accept it. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 146, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2006). La créativité: Psychologie de la découverte et del’invention [Creativity: Psychology of discovery and invention]. Paris: Robert Laffont.Google Scholar
  14. Currie, C. E., Elton, R. A., Todd, J., & Platt, S. (1997). Indicators of socio-economic status for adolescents: The WHO health behavior in school-aged survey. Health Education Research, 12, 385–397.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dai, D. Y., & Shen, J. L. (2008). Cultivating creative potential during adolescence: A developmental and educational perspective. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 18, 83–92.Google Scholar
  16. Dai, D. Y., Tan, X., Marathe, D., Valtcheva, A., Pruzek, R. M., & Shen, J. (2012). Influences of Social and Educational Environmentson Creativity During Adolescence: Does SES Matter? Creativity Research Journal, 24(23), 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dasgruptas & Sonthallas (2011). Role of parent-child relationship in creativity of adolescent boys and girls. Indian Journal of Community Psychology, 7(1), 155–172.Google Scholar
  18. Evans, G. W., & Kim, P. (2007). Childhood poverty and health cumulative risk exposure and stress deregulation. Psychological Science, 18(11), 953–957.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fan, J., & Zhang, L. F. (2014). The role of perceived parenting styles in thinking styles. Learning and Individual Differences, 32(3), 204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fearon, D. D., Copeland, D., & Saxon, T. F. (2013). The Relationship between Parenting Styles and Creativity in a Sample of Jamaican Children. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. (pp. 273–296). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Furnham, A., Zhang, J., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). The relationship between psychometric and self-estimated intelligence, creativity, personality, and academic achievement. Cognition and Personality, 25, 119–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gu, C. H., Chen, H. C., & Xu, J. J. (2003). The historiometric study of the early family environment and parental behavioral style of Chinese social creative personalities who passed away after A. D. 1840. Psychological Development and Education, 4, 17–22.Google Scholar
  24. Gu, C. H., Zhou, Z. K., & Hu, J. Y. (2008a). Psychometric analysis of social creative potential questionnaire for primary school children (Chinese). Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16(4), 340–343.Google Scholar
  25. Gu, C. H., Zhou, Z. K., & Wang, F. (2008b). The relationship of social creative tendency and personality attribute in primary school children. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 93(3), 91–95.Google Scholar
  26. Gu, C. H. (2009a). The development of social creativity tendency of primary school children. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 7(3), 198–202.Google Scholar
  27. Gu, C. H. (2009b). The difference in social creative tendency between primary school children from urban areas and their counterparts from rural areas and its implications to education. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 110(8), 85–89.Google Scholar
  28. Gu, C. H., Fan, C. Y., Zhang, D. J., Yang, S., & Song, J. J. (2012). The effect of parenting styles and personality on primary school children’s social creativity and social preferences. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 149(11), 79–83.Google Scholar
  29. Gu., C. H., Wang, Y. L., & Wu, C. F. (2015). Brain correlates underlying social creative thinking: EEG alpha activity in trait vs state creativity. Journal of Psychology, 47(6), 765–773.Google Scholar
  30. Gu, C., Hu, B., Ngwira, F., Jing, Z., & Zhou, Z. (2016). The effect of general creative personality and freedom of task choice on adolescents’ social creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(2), 132–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guo, M., & Wu, Q. (2011). Parenting styles and academic achievement: The mediating role of conscientiousness and motivation. Psychological Research, 4(2), 44–47.Google Scholar
  32. Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: A psychological perspective. Paper presented at the Based on a colloquium, Toward a Psychology of Creative Environments: An EcologicalPerspective, presented at the Institute of Personality Assessment and Research. Berkeley: University of California. Sep–1984.Google Scholar
  33. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criterion for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ilies, R., & Judge, T. A. (2003). On the heritability of job satisfaction: The mediating role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 750–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Velázquez, J. A., Segal, N. L., & Horwitz, B. N. (2014). Genetic and environmental influences on applied creativity: A reared-apart twin study. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaufman, J. C., Kaufman, S. B., & Lichtenberger, E. O. (2011). Finding creative potential on intelligence tests via divergent production. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 26(2), 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Karmakar, M., Elhai, J. D., Amialchuk, A. A., & Tietjen, G. E. (2017). Do personality traits mediate the relationship between childhood abuse and migraine? An exploration of the relationships in young adults using the add health dataset. Headache the Journal of Head and Face Pain, 58(2), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewallen, A. C., & Neece, C. L. (2015). Improved Social Skills in Children with Developmental Delays After Parent Participation in MBSR: The Role of Parent–Child Relational Factors. Journal of Child and Family Study, 24, 3117–3129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li, X. W., Zou, H., Liu, Y., & Zhou, Q. (2014). The relationships of family socioeconomic status, parent–adolescent conflict, and filial piety to adolescents’ family functioning in mainland China. Journal of Child and Family Study, 23, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu, Y., Wang, M., Villberg, J., Torsheim, T., Tynjälä, J., Lv, Y., & Kannas, L. (2012). Reliability and validity of Family Affluence Scale (FAS II) among adolescents in Beijing,China. Child Indicators Research, 5, 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matthews, K. A., & Gallo, L. C. (2011). Psychological perspectives on pathways linking socioeconomic status and physical health. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(4), 1–30.Google Scholar
  43. McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller, I. W., McDermut, W., & Gordon, K. C. (2000). Personality and family functioning in families of depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109(3), 539–545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Morris, A. S., Silk, J. S., Morris, M. D., Steinberg, L., Aucion, K. J., & Keyes, A. W. (2011). The influence of mother-child emotion regulation strategies on children’s expression of anger and sadness. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 213–225.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mouchiroud, C., & Lubart, T. I. (2002). Social creativity: A cross-sectional study of 6- 11- year- old children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(1), 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mouchiroud, C., & Bernoussi, A. (2008). An empirical study of the construct validity of social creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Münch, A. L., Hunger, C., & Schweitzer, J. (2016). An investigation of the mediating role of personality and family functioning in the association between attachment styles and eating disorder status. Bmc Psychology, 4(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Niu, W. (2007). Individual and environmental influences on Chinese student creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 3–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E. (1997). Developmental trends in creative potential and creative performance. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (vol.1) (pp. 115–153). New Jersey: Hampton Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  52. Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2010). Do tests of divergent thinking have an experiential bias? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 144–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’ Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1087–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., & Hess, K. I., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Song, J. J., Gu., C. H., & Zhang, Y. X. (2013). The effect of left-at-home adolescents’ Internet use on their social creativity: The mediating role of social relationship network. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 161(11), 63–69.Google Scholar
  56. Soroa, G., Balluerka, N., Hommel, B., & Aritzeta, A. (2015). Assessing interactions between cognition, emotion, and motivation in creativity: The construction and validation of EDICOS. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Steinberg, L., Darling, N. E., & Fletcher, A. C. (1995). Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment: An ecological journey. Washington, DC. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  59. Su, Z. Q., Zhang, D. J., & Shao, J. J. (2015). Relationship between SES and social adjustment of left-over children: with perceived discrimination as the mediator. Psychological Development and Education(Chinese), 31(2), 212–219.Google Scholar
  60. Suldo, S. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2004). The role of life satisfaction in the relationship between authoritative parenting dimensions and adolescent problem behavior. Social Indicators Research, 66(1/2), 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sun, P., Zou, H., & Yao-Iin, D.U. (2014). The characteristics of adolescents' creative thinking and their effects on creative behavior: the mediating role of personality. Psychological Development and Education, 4, 355–362.Google Scholar
  62. Tang, G. R., Zou, H., Hou, K., Cai, D., & Zhang, W. J. (2014). The characteristics of family innovation environment and their effects on everyday creative behavior: The mediating role of personality. Journal of Psychological Science, 37(5), 1125–1131.Google Scholar
  63. Taylor, R. D., Budescu, M., Gebre, A., & Hodzi, I. (2014). Family Financial Pressure and Maternal and Adolescent Socioemotional Adjustment: Moderating Effects of Kin Social Support in Low Income African American Families. Journal of Child and Family Study, 23, 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van, G. M., & Vedder, P. (2011). The role of family obligations and school adjustment in explaining the immigrant paradox. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wängqvist, M., Lamb, M. E., Frisén, A., & Hwang, C. P. (2015). Child and adolescent predictors of personality in early adulthood. Child Development, 86(4), 1253–1261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang, C. M., Zou, H., & Hou, K. (2006). The Relations among Respecting Behaviors, Personalities and Class Environment of Primary School Children. Psychological Development and Education, 3, 16–22.Google Scholar
  68. Zhang, J. H., Man, D. H., Liu, G. R., Zhang, S., Dou, F. F., & Lin, C. D. (2013). A Research on the Relationship between Elementary School Students’ Parenting Styles and Social Creativity: the Mediating Role of Self-esteem. Psychological Development and Education, 6, 595–603.Google Scholar
  69. Zhou, H., Niu, L. L., & Zou, H. (2000). A development study on five-factor personality questionnaire for middle school students. Psychological Development and Education, 1, 48–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyber Psychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education; School of PsychologyCentral China Normal UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Collaborative and Innovative Center for Educational TechnologyCentral China Normal UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations