Triangular Interactions of Unmarried African American Mothers and Fathers with their 3-Month-Old Infants
- 166 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
We examined the responsivity of unmarried African American fathers to bids from their 3-month-old infants during the Lausanne Trilogue Play (LTP), and the responses of mothers subsequent to father-baby exchanges. Twenty mother-father-infant triads (75% noncoresidential) with parents between the ages of 14 and 53 took part in the investigation. All fathers and the majority of mothers were African American with reported incomes at least 200% below the U.S. poverty line. All participants had previously completed a prenatal intervention study examining formation of coparenting alliances across their transitions to parenthood and were observed while playing together in videotaped LTP sessions at 3-months postpartum. We microanalyzed infants’ gaze orientation toward their fathers and the sequence of parent behaviors after babies’ bids to fathers. Father responses to bids from the infant were characterized as withdrawal, nonwithdrawal but failure to adapt behavior he had been showing prior to the baby’s bid, or affective and/or behavioral adjustment in response to the baby’s bid. Maternal reactions to the father-baby exchange were coded as either reinforcing, opposing, or neutral. Analyses revealed that fathers showed substantial evidence of intuitive parenting and matching behavior, and mothers overwhelmingly supported, rather than interfered with or disrupted, baby-father exchanges. Results are discussed in contradistinction to deceptive commonplace depictions of African American families that focus largely on deficits rather than strengths, and recommendations for family research and practice are offered.
Keywords
African American Coparents Infants Noncoresidential FathersNotes
Author Contributions
E.E.C. designed this study, served as primary evaluator, analyzed the data, worked in partnership in the writing of the Introduction, and wrote the Method and Results sections of the report. J.P.M. planned and served as Principal Investigator for the parent Brady Education Foundation project that provided observational data for this study, assisted with the data analyses, worked in partnership in the writing of the Introduction, and wrote the Discussion section.
Funding
The project generating data for this study was funded by a Brady Education Foundation Early Childhood Grant.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of South Florida and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
References
- Allen, S. M., & Hawkins, A. J. (1999). Maternal gatekeeping: Mother’s beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 199–212.Google Scholar
- Amato, P. R. (2005). The impact of family formation change on the cognitive, social, and emotional well-being of the next generation. The Future of Children, 15, 75–96.Google Scholar
- Amato, P. R. (1998). More than money? Men’s contributions to their children’s lives. In A. Booth SpringerAmpamp; A. Crouter (Eds.), Men in families: When do they get involved? What difference does it make? (pp. 241–278). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Blankenhorn, D. (1995). Fatherless America: Confronting our most urgent social problem. Scranton, PA: HarperCollins Publishers 18512.Google Scholar
- Boulware, L. E., Cooper, L. A., Ratner, L. E., LaVeist, T. A., & Powe, N. R. (2003). Race and trust in the health care system. Public Health Reports, 118, 358–365.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Cannon, E. A., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Mangelsdorf, S. C., Brown, G. L., & Sokolowski, M. S. (2008). Parent characteristics as antecedents of maternal gatekeeping and fathering behavior. Family Process, 47, 501–519.Google Scholar
- Carlson, M. J., & Hognas, R. S. (2011). Coparenting in fragile families: Understanding how parents work together after a nonmarital birth. In J. P. McHale & K. M. Lindahl (Eds.), Coparenting: A conceptual and clinical examination of family systems (pp. 81–104). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Carlson, M. J., McLanahan, S. S., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2008). Coparenting and nonresident fathers’ involvement with young children after a nonmarital birth. Demography, 45, 461–488.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Cassiman, S. A. (2008). Resisting the neo‐liberal poverty discourse: On constructing deadbeat dads and welfare queens. Sociology Compass, 2, 1690–1700.Google Scholar
- Cherlin, A. J. (2010). The marriage go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Cohen, R. S., & Weissman, S. H. (1984). The parenting alliance. In R. S. Cohen, B. J. Cohler & S. H. Weissman (Eds.), Parenthood: A psychodynamic perspective (pp. 33–49). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Coley, R. L., & Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (1999). Stability and change in paternal involvement among urban African American fathers. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 416–435.Google Scholar
- Danziger, S. K., & Radin, N. (1990). Absent does not equal uninvolved: Predictors of fathering in teen mother families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 636–642.Google Scholar
- DeLuccie, M. F. (1995). Mothers as gatekeepers: A model of maternal mediators of father involvement. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156, 115–131.Google Scholar
- Dyer, W.J., Fagan, J., Kaufman, R., Pearson, J., & Cabrera, N. (2017), Self-perceived coparenting of nonresident fathers: Scale development and validation. Family Process. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12331. [Epub ahead of print]. Advance online publicationGoogle Scholar
- Edin, K. (2000). What do low-income single mothers say about marriage? Social Problems, 47, 112–133.Google Scholar
- Edin, K., Tach, L., & Mincy, R. (2009). Claiming fatherhood: Race and the dynamics of paternal involvement among unmarried men. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621, 149–177.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fagan, J., & Kaufman, R. (2015). Co‐parenting relationships among low‐income, unmarried parents: Perspectives of fathers in fatherhood programs. Family Court Review, 53, 304–316.Google Scholar
- Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., & Corboz-Warnery, A. (1999). The primary triangle: A developmental systems view of fathers, mothers, and infants. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., Favez, N., Lavanchy, S., De Noni, S., & Frascarolo, F. (2005). Four-month-olds make triangular bids to father and mother during trilogue play with still-face. Social Development, 14, 361–378.Google Scholar
- Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., Lavanchy-Scaiola, C., & Favez, N. (2010). The young infant’s triangular communication in the family: Access to threesome intersubjectivity? Conceptual considerations and case illustrations. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 20, 125–140.Google Scholar
- Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., & Philipp, D. A. (2014). The baby and the couple: Understanding and treating young families. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Furstenberg, F. F. (2001). Managing to make it: Afterthoughts. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 150–162.Google Scholar
- Furstenberg, F. F., & Hughes, M. E. (1995). Social capital and successful development among at-risk youth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 580–592.Google Scholar
- Gadsden, V. L., Davis, J. E., & Johnson, C. J. (2015). African American fathers and families within cultural and historical perspective. In J. L. Roopnarine (Ed.), Fathers across cultures: The importance, roles, and diverse practices of dads (pp. 155–182). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger/ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
- Ganong, L., Coleman, M., & McCaulley, G. (2012). Gatekeeping after separation and divorce. In K. Kuehnle & L. Drozd (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court (pp. 369–398). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gaskin-Butler, V., Engert, T., Markewitz, M., Swenson, C., & McHale, J. (2012). Prenatal representations of coparenting in unmarried African American mothers. Family Process, 51, 357–372.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, B. R., Mathis, C. C., & Woods, A. K. (2007). African Americans and their distrust of the health care system: Healthcare for diverse populations. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 14, 56–60.Google Scholar
- Lavadera, A. L., Laghi, F., & Togliatti, M. M. (2011). Assessing family coordination in divorced families. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 39, 277–291.Google Scholar
- Lieberson, R., Rotman, T., Hartman, O., Giampa, S., Kuersten-Hogan, R., & McHale, J.P. (2004). An analysis of early coparenting dynamics at 3 months post-partum. Poster presented at the 9th World Congress of the World Association for Infant Mental Health, Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (2014). The uneven retreat from marriage in the U.S., 1950–2010. In L. P. Boustan, C. Frydman & R. A. Margo (Eds.), Human capital and history: The American record (pp. 241–272). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- McHale, J. (2011). Assessing coparenting. In J. McHale & K. Lindahl (Eds.), Coparenting: A conceptual and clinical examination of family systems (pp. 149–170). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
- McHale, J., & Coates, E. E. (2014). Observed coparenting and triadic dynamics in African American fragile families at 3 months post-partum. Infant Mental Health Journal, 35, 435–451.Google Scholar
- McHale, J. P., & Cowan, P. A. (1996). Understanding how family-level dynamics affect children’s development: Studies of two-parent families. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- McHale, J., & Dickstein, S. (2018). The interpersonal context of early childhood development: A systemic approach to infant-family assessment. In A. Carter & R. DelCarmen Wiggins (Eds.), Oxford handbook of infant, toddler, and preschool mental health assessment, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- McHale, J., & Fivaz-Depeursinge, E. (1999). Understanding triadic and family group process during infancy and early childhood. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2, 107–127.Google Scholar
- McHale, J., Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., Dickstein, S., Robertson, J., & Daley, M. (2008). New evidence for the social embeddedness of infants’ early triangular capacities. Family Process, 47, 445–463.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- McHale, J., Gaskin-Butler, V., McKay, K., & Gallardo, G. (2013). Figuring it out for the child: Fostering coparenting in unmarried expectant African American parents. ZERO TO THREE Journal, 33, 17–22.Google Scholar
- McHale, J., & Irace, K. (2011). Coparenting in diverse family systems. In J. McHale & K. Lindahl (Eds.), Coparenting: A conceptual and clinical examination of family systems (pp. 15–38). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
- McHale, J., & Phares, V. (2015). From dyads to family systems: A bold new direction for infantmental health practice. ZERO TO THREE Journal, 35, 1–8.Google Scholar
- McLanahan, S. S., & Carlson, M. J. (2002). Welfare reform, fertility, and father involvement. The Future of Children, 12, 147–165.Google Scholar
- Minuchin, P., Colapinto, J., & Minuchin, S. (2007). Working with families of the poor (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Mixon, E. (1999). Deadbeat dads: Undeserving of the Right to inherit from their illegitimate children and undeserving of equal protection. Georgia Law Review, 34, 1773.Google Scholar
- Ooms, T. (1996). Where is the family in comprehensive community initiatives for children and families? Paper presented at the Aspen Roundtable on Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families, Aspen, CO.Google Scholar
- Ooms, T., & Wilson, P. (2004). The challenges of offering relationship and marriage education to low-income populations. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 53, 440–447.Google Scholar
- Papoušek, H., & Papoušek, M. (1987). Intuitive parenting: A dialectic counterpart to the infant’s integrative competence. In J. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd ed.). (pp. 669–720). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Papoušek, H., & Papoušek, M. (1992). Beyond emotional bonding: The role of preverbal communication in mental growth and health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 13, 43–53.Google Scholar
- Puhlman, D. J., & Pasley, K. (2013). Rethinking maternal gatekeeping. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5, 176–193.Google Scholar
- Raley, R. K., Sweeney, M. M., & Wondra, D. (2015). The growing racial and ethnic divide in U.S. Marriage Patterns. The Future of Children / Center for the Future of Children, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, 25, 89–109.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Reichman, N. E., Teitler, J. O., Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan, S. S. (2001). Fragile families: Sample and design. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 303–326.Google Scholar
- Roy, K. M., Buckmiller, N., & McDowell, A. (2008). Together but not ‘Together’: Trajectories of relationship suspension for low-income unmarried parents. Family Relations, 57, 198–210.Google Scholar
- Roy, K., & Burton, L. (2007). Mothering through recruitment: Kinscription of nonresidential fathers and father figures in low-income families. Family Relations, 56, 24–39.Google Scholar
- Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Altenburger, L. E., Lee, M. A., Bower, D. J., & Kamp Dush, C. M. (2015). Who are the gatekeepers? Predictors of maternal gatekeeping. Parenting, Science and Practice, 15, 166–186.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Brown, G. L., Cannon, E. A., Mangelsdorf, S. C., & Sokolowski, M. S. (2008). Maternal gatekeeping, coparenting quality, and fathering behavior in families with infants. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 389–398.Google Scholar
- Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Settle, T., Lee, J., & Kamp Dush, C. M. (2016). Supportive coparenting relationships as a haven of psychological safety at the transition to parenthood. Research in Human Development, 13, 32–48.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Seery, B. L., & Crowley, M. W. (2000). Women’s emotion work in the family: Relationships management and the process of building father-child relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 100–127.Google Scholar
- Seltzer, J. A. (1991). Relationships between fathers and children who live apart: The father’s role after separation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 79–101.Google Scholar
- Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.Google Scholar
- Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Stier, H., & Tienda, M. (1993). Are men marginal to the family? Insights from Chicago’s inner city. In J. C. Hood & J. C. Hood (Eds.), Men, work, and family (pp. 23–44). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Strathearn, L., Li, J., Fonagy, P., & Montague, P. R. (2008). What’s in a smile? Maternal brain responses to infant facial cues. Pediatrics, 122, 40–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Tanner, A., Kim, S. H., Friedman, D. B., Foster, C., & Bergeron, C. D. (2015). Barriers to medical research participation as perceived by clinical trial investigators: Communicating with rural and African American communities. Journal of Health Communication, 20, 88–96.Google Scholar
- Trinder, L. (2008). Maternal gate closing and gate opening in postdivorce families. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 1298–1324.Google Scholar
- Walker, A. J., & McGraw, L. A. (2000). Who is responsible for responsible fathering. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 563–569.Google Scholar
- Wilson, W. J., & Neckerman, K. M. (1987). Poverty and family structure: The widening gap between evidence and public policy issues. In S. H. Danziger, D. H. Weinberg, S. H. Danziger & D. H. Weinberg (Eds.), Fighting poverty: What works and what doesn’t (pp. 232–259). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar