Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1805–1817 | Cite as

The Development, Psychometric Analyses and Correlates of a Self-Report Measure on Disorganization and Role Reversal

  • Molisa Meier
  • Jean-François BureauEmail author
Original Paper
  • 158 Downloads

Abstract

A limited number of measures assess young adults’ perceptions of childhood disorganized and controlling attachment, and although they are empirically strong, the use of these measures can be time consuming and financially straining. The current study aimed to add to the attachment literature by developing a self-report measure, the Childhood Disorganization and Role Reversal Scale (CDRR), to assess for the complexity of those attachment constructs in young adults. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the CDRR using two separate samples of 750 and 656 undergraduate students (601 females; Mage = 18.68, 66.4% Caucasian; 531 females; Mage = 18.68 years, 63.6% Caucasian; respectively), and a community sample of 96 participants (81 females, Mage = 19.27, 65.6% Caucasian). The results of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed a four-factor structure for both CDRR parent versions. The CDRR mother version includes the Disorganization/Punitive, Mutual Hostility, Affective Caregiving, and Appropriate Boundaries scales, while the CDRR father version includes the Disorganization, Affective Caregiving, Appropriate Boundaries, and Punitive scales. Overall, support was provided for the psychometric properties of the CDRR. For instance, the CDRR scales demonstrated adequate structural stability (confirmatory factor analyses), internal consistency (Cronbach’s coefficient alphas ranged from .78–.95 for mother scale, and .75–.96 or father scale), temporal reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from .68–.89 for mother scale, and .69–.87 for father scale), criterion-related validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The CDRR will assist researchers in broadening the understanding of psychological outcomes of disorganized and controlling attachment representations in young adulthood.

Keywords

Attachment Disorganized/controlling attachment Parentification Scale development Young adults 

Notes

Author Contributions

M.M.: collaborated in the design and execution of the study, data analysis and writing of the paper. J.F.B.: collaborated in the design and execution of the study, data analysis and writing of the paper.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Ottawa’s Research Ethics Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alexander, P. (2003). Parent-child role reversal: Development of a measure and test of an attachment theory model. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 22, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books. /1982.Google Scholar
  3. Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. Aetiological and psychopathology in the light of attachment theory. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowlby., J. (1980). Attachment and loss. Vol. 3. Loss. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Sparks, G. (1973). Invisible loyalties: Reciprocity in intergenerational family therapy. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  6. Bretherton, I. (2010). Fathers in attachment theory and research: A review. Early Child Development and Care, 180, 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bureau, J.-F., Easterbrooks, A., & Lyons-Ruth, K. (2009a). Attachment disorganization and controlling behaviour in middle childhood: maternal and child precursors and correlates. Attachment & Human Development, 11, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bureau, J.-F., Easterbrooks, A., & Lyons-Ruth, K. (2009b). The association between middle childhood controlling and disorganized attachment and family correlates in young adulthood. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  9. Cassidy, J., & Marvin, R. S. (1992). Attachment organization in preschool children: Procedures and coding manual (Unpublished manual). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  10. Cyr, C., Euser, E. M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2010). Attachment security and disorganization in maltreating and high-risk families: a series of meta-analyses. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Easterbrooks, M. A., Bureau, J.-F., & Lyons-Ruth, K. (2012). Developmental correlates and predictors of emotional availability in mother–child interaction: A longitudinal study from infancy to middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1985). The Adult Attachment Interview protocol (Unpublished manuscript). Berkeley: University of California. /1996.Google Scholar
  13. George, C., & Solomon, J. (2008). The caregiving system. A behavioural systems approach to parenting. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications (2nd ed.). (pp. 833–856). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Grossmann, K., Grossmann, K. E., Kindler, H., & Zimmermann, P. (2008). A wider view of attachment and exploration: The influence of mothers and fathers on the development of psychological security from infancy to young adulthood. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed.). (pp. 857–879). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hooper, L. M. (2009). Parentification Inventory. Louisville, KY: Department of Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, Counseling, and College Personnel, University of Louisville.Google Scholar
  16. Hooper, L. M., & Doehler, K. (2012). Assessing family caregiving: a comparison of three retrospective parentification measures. Journal of Marital Family Therapy, 38(4), 653–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hooper, L. M., Doehler, K., Wallace, S. A., & Hannah, N. J. (2011). The parentification inventory: development, validation, and cross-validation. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 39(3), 226–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jankowski, P., Hooper, L., Sandage, S., & Hannah, N. (2013). Parentification and mental health symptoms: mediator effects of perceived unfairness and differentiation of self. Journal of Family Therapy, 35, 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jurkovic, G. J., & Thirkield, A. (1998). Parentification Questionnaire. Atlanta, GA: Department of Psychology, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
  20. Katz, J., Petracca, M., & Rabinowitz, J. (2009). A retrospective study of daughters’ emotional role reversal with parents, attachment anxiety, excessive reassurance-seeking, and depressive symptoms. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 37, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kerig, P. K. (2005). Revisiting the construct of boundary dissolution: A multidimensional perspective. In P. K. Kerig (Ed.), Implications of parent-child boundary dissolution for developmental psychopathology: “Who is the parent and who is the child?” (pp. 5–42). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Maltreatment & Trauma Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kerig, P. A., Swanson, J. A., & Ward, R. M. (2012). Autonomy with connection influences of parental psychological control on mutuality in emerging adults’ close relationships. In P. A. Kerig, M. C. Schulz & S. T. Hauser (Eds.), Adolescence and beyond: Family processes and development (pp. 134–153). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyons-Ruth, K., Bronfman, E., & Parsons, E. (1999). Maternal frightened, frightening, or atypical behaviour and disorganized infant attachment patterns. In J. Vondra & D. Barnett (Eds.), A typical patterns of infant attachment: theory, research, and current directions. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64 (3, Serial No. 258), 67–96.Google Scholar
  25. Lyons-Ruth, K., & Jacobvitz, D. (2008). Attachment disorganization: Genetic factors, parenting contexts, and developmental transformation from infancy to adulthood. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications (2nd ed.). (pp. 666–697). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Main, M., & Cassidy, J. (1988). Categories of response to reunion with the parent at age 6: predictable from infant attachment classifications and stable over a 1-month period. Developmental Psychology, 24, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1985). The Adult Attachment Interview classification and scoring system (Unpublished manuscript). Berkeley, California: University of California. /1995.Google Scholar
  28. Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1990). Parents’ unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status: Is frightened and/or frightening parental behavior the linking mechanism? In M. T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years (pp. 161–182). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Main, M., Kaplan, N. & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherthon & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Growing points in attachment theory and research. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1-2, Serial No. 209), 66–104.Google Scholar
  30. Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In M. T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years (pp. 121–160). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Meier, M., Martin, J., Bureau, J.-F., Speedy, M., Levesque, C., & Lafontaine, M.-F. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Mother and Father Compulsive Caregiving Scales: a brief measure of current young adult caregiving behaviors toward parents. Attachment & Human Development, 16(2), 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mika, P., Bergner, R. M., & Baum, M. C. (1987). The development of a scale for the assessment of parentification. Family Therapy, 14(3), 229–235.Google Scholar
  33. Moss, E., Bureau, J.-F., St. Laurent, D., & Tarabulsy, G. (2011). Understanding disorganized attachment at preschool and school age: Examining divergent pathways of disorganized and controlling children. In J. Solomon & C. George (Eds.), Attachment disorganization (2nd ed.). (pp. 52–79). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  34. Moss, E., Cyr, C., Bureau, J.-F., Tarabulsy, G. M., & Dubois-Comtois, K. (2005). Stability of attachment during the preschool period. Developmental Psychology, 41(5), 773–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moss, E., Cyr, C., & Dubois-Comtois, K. (2004). Attachment at early school age and developmental risk: examining family contexts and behaviour problems of controlling-caregiving, controlling–punitive, and behaviourally disorganized children. Developmental Psychology, 40, 519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Solomon, J., George, C., & De Jong, A. (1995). Children classified as controlling at age six: evidence of disorganized representational strategies and aggression at home and school. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Obsuth, I., Hennighausen, K., Brumariu, L. E., & Lyons-Ruth, K. (2014). Disorganized behavior in adolescent-parent interaction: relations to attachment state of mind, partner abuse, and psychopathology. Child Development, 85, 370–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Connor, E., Bureau, J.-F., McCartney, K., & Lyons-Ruth, K. (2011). Risk and outcomes associated with disorganized/controlling patterns of attachment at age 3 years in the National Institute of Child Health & Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. Infant Mental Health Journal, 32, 450–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 1–15). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. van IJzendoorn, M. H., Schuengel, C., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (1999). Disorganized attachment in early childhood: Meta-analysis of precursors, concomitants, and sequelae. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wartner, U. G., Grossman, K., Fremmer-Bombik, E., & Suess, G. (1994). Attachment patterns at age six in South Germany: predictability form infancy and implications for preschool behaviour. Child Development, 65, 1014–1027.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations