Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1940–1949 | Cite as

How do Children Associate Food Type to Illustrated Height and Obesity?

  • Lakshmi RamanEmail author
  • Jasmine Cosby
  • Lama Hodroj
Original Paper
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

The following three studies examined young children’s and adults’ recognition of the impact of healthy and unhealthy foods on height and weight. Study 1 examined the impact of foods on height and weight. Study 2 examined the role of foods on characters of different ethnicities. Study 3 controlled for participants’ prior knowledge about the impact of food by presenting fictitious alien characters. The results indicated that preschoolers recognized that healthy foods promoted an increase in height but only for African-American images. Adults recognized the impact of nutrition on both height and weight with a greater emphasis of nutrition for weight than height. These results demonstrate that preschoolers’ biological model is more sophisticated and differentiated than previously reported.

Keywords

Food selection Cognitive development Biological processes Categorization Reasoning 

Notes

Author Contributions

L.R.: designed the study, contributed to the data collection, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. J.C.: assisted with the data collection and preparation of the stimuli. L.H.: assisted with the data collection.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants are in accordance with the ethical standards of Oakland University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Au, T. K., & Romo, L. F. (1999). Mechanical causality in children’s “folkbiology”. In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 355–401). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Backscheider, A., Shatz, M. & Gelman, S. A. (1993). Preschoolers’ ability to distinguish living things as a function of regrowth. Child Development, 64(4), 1242–1257.10.111/j.1467-8642.1993.tb04198.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birch, L. L., Fisher, J., & Grimm-Thomas, K. (1999). Children and food. In S. Siegal & C. Peterson (Eds.), Children’s understanding of biology and health (pp. 161–183). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gellert, E. (1962). ‘Children’s conceptions of the content and functions of the human body’. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 65, 293–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Naïve biology as a core domain of thought. In K. Inagaki & G. Hatano (Eds.), Young children’s naïve thinking about the biological world (pp. 1–17). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  6. Inagaki, K. (1997). Emerging distinctions between naïve biology and naïve psychology. In H. M. Wellman & K. Inagaki (Eds.), The emergence of core domains of thought: Children’s reasoning about physical, psychological, and biological phenomena (pp. 27–44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Kalish, C. W. (1996). Causes and symptoms in preschooler’s conceptions of illness. Child Development, 67, 1647–1670.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8642.1996.tb01819.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Raman, L. (2018). Do children think that inheritance determines height and weight? Infant and Child Development. 27(1),  https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.204.
  9. Raman, L. (2016). The role of skin color on children’s biological and non-biological judgments. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 11(2), 1–13.Google Scholar
  10. Raman, L. (2014). Children’s and adults’ understanding of the impact of nutrition on biological and psychological processes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 78–93. https://doi.org/10.111/bjdp.12024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Siegal, M. (1988). Children’s knowledge of contagion and contamination in the causes of illness. Child Development, 59, 1353–1359.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1130497. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Slaughter, V., & Ting, C. (2010). Development of ideas about food and nutrition from preschool to university. Appetite, 55, 556–564.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.09.004. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Springer, K. & Belk, A. (1994). The role of physical contact and association in early contamination sensitivity. Developmental Psychology, 30, 864–868.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.6.864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Springer, K. & Ruckel, J. (1992). Early beliefs about the cause of illness: Evidence against immanent justice. Cognitive Development, 7, 429–443.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(92)80002-W.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Toyama, N. (2000). What are food and air like inside our bodies? Children’s thinking about digestion and respiration. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 222–230.  https://doi.org/10.1080/016502500383359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wellman, H. M., & Johnson, C. N. (1982). Children’s understanding of food and its functions: a preliminary study of the development of concepts of nutrition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 3(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10/1016/0193-3973(82) 90024-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oakland UniversityRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations