Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1763–1773 | Cite as

Perceptions of Adequate Personal Time and Wellbeing among African American Families with Adolescents

  • Mia BudescuEmail author
  • Amanda Sisselman-Borgia
  • Ronald D. Taylor
Original Paper
  • 172 Downloads

Abstract

The current study examines the perception of adequate personal or leisure time, and its association with family and caregiver functioning, among a sample of low-income African American families. The investigation is grounded in Conservation of Resources (COR) theory which predicts that caregivers who perceive more adequate personal time will also report higher levels of optimism and lower levels of depressive symptoms, and will have adolescents who report more household routines and less psychologically controlling parenting. A total of 115 caregiver-adolescent (age 14–18) dyads were recruited from a low-income, predominantly African American neighborhood in a major metropolitan center in the United States as part of a larger survey on African American family life. Results indicate that caregivers report perceiving inadequate amounts of time to sleep, get enough exercise, and relax. Caregivers also report comparatively less adequate personal time than time with children. Analyses reveal that caregivers who perceive having more adequate leisure or personal time, report fewer depressive symptoms and higher levels of optimism, after controlling for perceptions of adequate financial resources. Alternatively, there was no association between perceptions of free or leisure time and parenting behaviors, including maintenance of household routines and the use of psychological control. The results underscore the need to examine non-material resources, and their association with wellbeing.

Keywords

Families Adolescents Leisure time Parenting Wellbeing 

Notes

Author Contributions

M.B.: Analyzed the data and wrote the paper. A.S.B.: Collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript. R.D.T.: Designed and executed the study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. IRB approval was received from Temple University (Philadelphia) under an expedited review process.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All adolescents under the age of 18 had to obtain their caregivers’ consent to participate in the study. Once caregiver consent was obtained, adolescents were read a consent form out loud and asked to provide their verbal assent to participate in the study. Caregivers were given a consent form to sign and read, explaining the risks and benefits associated with participation. Adolescent assent was obtained in a separate room from their caregivers, so that they did not feel coerced into participating.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., Czasch, C., & Flood, M. G. (2009). From intentions to behavior: implementation intention, commitment, and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(6), 1356–1372.Google Scholar
  2. Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67(6), 3296–3319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milke, M. A. (2006). The changing rhythms of American family life. Washington, DC: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Bianchi, S.M. (2009). What gives when mothers are employed? Parental time allocation in dual-earner and single-earner two-parent families. In D.R. Crane, E.J. Hill (Eds.), Handbook of families and work: interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 305–330). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  5. Boniwell, I., Osin, E., & Sircova, A. (2014). Introducing time perspective coaching: a new approach to improve time management enhances well-being. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 12(2), 24–40.Google Scholar
  6. Brennan, P. A., Le Brocque, R., & Hammen, C. (2003). Maternal depression, parent–child relationships, and resilient outcomes in adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(12), 1469–1477.Google Scholar
  7. Brody, G. H., & Flor, D. L. (1997). Maternal psychological functioning, family processes, and child adjustment in rural, single-parent, African American families. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 1000–1011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brody, G. H., Dorsey, S., Forehand, R., & Armistead, L. (2002). Unique and protective contributions of parenting and classroom processes to the adjustment of African American children living in single‐parent families. Child Development, 73(1), 274–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Budescu, M., & Taylor, R. D. (2013). Order in the home: family routines moderate the impact of financial hardship. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(2), 63–72.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, S. M., Harvey, A. S., Shaw, S. M., & Michelson, W. (1990). Time use and leisure: subjective and objective aspects. Social Indicators Research, 23(4), 337–352.Google Scholar
  11. Conger, R. D., & Elder, Jr, G. H. (1994). Families in troubled times: adapting to change in rural America. Social institutions and social change. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Conger, R. D., Wallace, L. E., Sun, Y., Simons, R. L., McLoyd, V. C., & Brody, G. H. (2002). Economic pressure in African American families: a replication and extension of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 179–193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 175–199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Conley, D. (1999). Being black, living in the red: race, wealth, and social policy in America. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Craig, L., & Brown, J. E. (2014). Weekend work and leisure time with family and friends: who misses out? Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(4), 710–727.Google Scholar
  16. Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2010). Parenthood, gender and work‐family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1344–1361.Google Scholar
  17. Cronkite, R. C., Moose, R. H., Twohey, K., Cohen, C., & Swindle, Jr., R. (1998). Life circumstances and personal resources as predictors of the ten-year course of depression. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(2), 255–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: the psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Daly, K. J. (2001). Deconstructing family time: from ideology to lived experience. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 283–294.Google Scholar
  20. DeVoe, S. E., & House, J. (2011). Time, money, and happiness: how does putting a price on time affect our ability to smell the roses? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 466–474.Google Scholar
  21. Droit-Volet, S., & Meck, W. H. (2007). How emotions colour our perception of time. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(12), 504–513.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunst, C. J., & Leet, H. E. (1987). Measuring the adequacy of resources in households with young children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 13(2), 111–125.Google Scholar
  23. Elder, Jr, G. H., Eccles, J. S., Ardelt, M., & Lord, S. (1995). Inner-city parents under economic pressure: perspectives on the strategies of parenting. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(3), 771–784.Google Scholar
  24. Flegal, K. M., Carroll, M. D., Ogden, C. L., & Curtin, L. R. (2010). Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303(3), 235–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Garling, T., Krause, K., Gamble, A., & Hartig, T. (2014). Emotional well-being and time pressure. PsyCh Journal, 3(2), 132–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gershuny, J., & Sullivan, O. (2003). Time use, gender, and public policy regimes. Social Politics, 10(2), 205–228.Google Scholar
  27. Goodin, R. E., Rice, J. M., Bittman, M., & Saunders, P. (2005). The time-pressure illusion: discretionary time vs. free time. Social Indicators Research, 73, 43–70.Google Scholar
  28. Goodman, S. H., Rouse, M. H., Connell, A. M., Broth, M. R., Hall, C. M., & Heyward, D. (2011). Maternal depression and child psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14(1), 1–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Halbesleben, J. R., Neveu, J. P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334–1364.Google Scholar
  30. Hill, R., Tranby, E., Kelly, E., & Moen, P. (2013). Relieving the time squeeze? Effects of a white-collar workplace change on parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(4), 1014–1029.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421.Google Scholar
  33. James, W. (1890). The consciousness of self. The principles of psychology, 8. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Company.Google Scholar
  34. Jensen, E. W., James, S. A., Boyce, W. T., & Hartnett, S. A. (1983). The family routines inventory: development and validation. Social Science & Medicine, 17(4), 201–211.Google Scholar
  35. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 429–434.Google Scholar
  36. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the study of statistical intuitions. Cognition, 11(2), 123–141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Koulouglioti, C., Cole, R., & Kitzman, H. (2009). The role of children’s routines of daily living, supervision, and maternal fatigue in preschool children’s injury risk. Research in Nursing & Health, 32(5), 517–529.Google Scholar
  38. Lee, S., Almeida, D. M., Davis, K. D., King, R. B., Hammer, L. B., & Kelly, E. L. (2015). Latent profiles of perceived time adequacy for paid work, parenting, and partner roles. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(5), 788–798.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Liss, M., Schiffrin, H. H., & Rizzo, K. M. (2013). Maternal guilt and shame: the role of self-discrepancy and fear of negative evaluation. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 1112–1119.Google Scholar
  40. Lloyd, K. M., & Auld, C. J. (2002). The role of leisure in determining quality of life: issues of content and measurement. Social Indicators Research, 57(1), 43–71.Google Scholar
  41. Mannetti, L., Leder, S., Insalata, L., Pierro, A., Higgins, T., & Kruglanski, A. (2009). Priming the ant or the grasshopper in people’s mind: how regulatory mode affects inter‐temporal choices. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 1120–1125.Google Scholar
  42. Manrai, L. A., & Manrai, A. K. (1995). Effects of cultural-context, gender, and acculturation on perceptions of work versus social/leisure time usage. Journal of Business Research, 32(2), 115–128.Google Scholar
  43. Maslach, C. (2003). Job burnout: new directions in research and intervention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(5), 189–192.Google Scholar
  44. Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2003). Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: the US experience. Social Forces, 81(3), 999–1030.Google Scholar
  45. Mattingly, M. J., & Sayer, L. C. (2006). Under pressure: gender differences in the relationship between free time and feeling rushed. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(1), 205–221.Google Scholar
  46. McLoyd, V. C. (1990). The impact of economic hardship on black families and children: psychological distress, parenting, and socioemotional development. Child Development, 61(2), 311–346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. McLoyd, V. C., Jayaratne, T. E., Ceballo, R., & Borquez, J. (1994). Unemployment and work interruption among African American single mothers: effects on parenting and adolescent socioemotional functioning. Child Development, 65(2), 562–589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Meltzer, L. J., & Mindell, J. A. (2007). Relationship between child sleep disturbances and maternal sleep, mood, and parenting stress: a pilot study. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(1), 67–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Milkie, M. A., Raley, S. B., & Bianchi, S. M. (2009). Taking on the second shift: time allocations and time pressures of US parents with preschoolers. Social Forces, 88(2), 487–517.Google Scholar
  50. Milkie, M. A., Mattingly, M. J., Nomacuchi, K. M., Bianchi, S. M., & Robinson, J. P. (2004). The time squeeze: parental statuses and feelings about time with children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 739–761.Google Scholar
  51. Moen, P., Kelly, E. L., & Lam, J. (2013). Healthy work revisited: do changes in time strain predict well-being? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 157.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Oliver, M. L., & Shapiro, T. M. (1995). Black wealth/white wealth: a new perspective on racial inequality. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Parker, K. & Wang, W. (2013). Work and employment. http://www.pewresearch.org/data-trend/society-and-demographics/parental-time-use/. Accessed 23 Oct 2016.
  54. Penedo, F. J., & Dahn, J. R. (2005). Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 18(2), 189–193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Pica, G., Amato, C., Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2015). The early bird gets the worm: on locomotors’ preference for morningness. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 158–160.Google Scholar
  56. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.Google Scholar
  57. Ragheb, M. G., & Tate, R. L. (1993). A behavioural model of leisure participation, based on leisure attitude, motivation and satisfaction. Leisure Studies, 12(1), 61–70.Google Scholar
  58. Roxburgh, S. (2004). ‘There just enough hours in the day’: the mental health consequences of time pressure. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 115–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4(3), 219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Seagram, S., & Daniluk, J. C. (2002). “It goes with the territory”: the meaning and experience of maternal guilt for mothers of preadolescent children. Women & Therapy, 25(1), 61–88.Google Scholar
  61. Shields, M. (1999). Long working hours and health. Health Reports, 11, 1–17.Google Scholar
  62. Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Sierens, E. (2009). How are parental psychological control and autonomy‐support related? A cluster‐analytic approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 187–202.Google Scholar
  63. Strazdins, L., & Loughrey, B. (2008). Too busy: why time is a health and environmental problem. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin, 18, 219–221.Google Scholar
  64. Taylor, R. D., Budescu, M., Gebre, A., & Hodzic, I. (2014). Family financial pressure and maternal and adolescent socioemotional adjustment: moderating effects of kin social support in low income African American families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(2), 242–254.Google Scholar
  65. Taylor, R. D. (2010). Kin support and parenting practices among low-income African American mothers: moderating effects of mothers’ psychological adjustment. Journal of Black Psychology, 37(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  66. Taylor, R. D. (1996). Adolescents’ perceptions of kinship support and family management practices: association with adolescent adjustment in African American families. Developmental Psychology, 32(4), 687–695.Google Scholar
  67. Van Horn, M. L., Bellis, J. M., & Snyder, S. W. (2001). Family resource scale-revised: psychometrics and validation of a measure of family resources in a sample of low-income families. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19(1), 54–68.Google Scholar
  68. Van Hoye, G., & Lootens, H. (2013). Coping with unemployment: personality, role demands, and time structure. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(2), 85–95.Google Scholar
  69. Wajcman, J. (2008). Life in the fast lane? Towards a sociology of technology and time. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(1), 59–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Wittmann, M., & Paulus, M. P. (2008). Decision making, impulsivity and time perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(1), 7–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Wright, V. R., Raley, S. B., & Bianchi, S. M. (2008). Time for children, one’s spouse and oneself among parents who work nonstandard hours. Social Forces, 87(1), 243–271.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mia Budescu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amanda Sisselman-Borgia
    • 2
  • Ronald D. Taylor
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLehman CollegeBronxUSA
  2. 2.Department of Social WorkLehman CollegeBronxUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations