Predictors of Mothers’ Self-Identified Challenges in Parenting Infants: Insights from a Large, Nationally Diverse Cohort
- 116 Downloads
Being a parent of an infant is full of challenges, yet little is known about how child, mother, family, or socio-contextual factors relate to mothers’ self-identified challenges. Mothers of infants from a large (N = 6383) representative longitudinal sample of New Zealand children and their families were asked to report their biggest challenge over the first 9 months of their infant’s life. Thematic analysis was used to identify five main maternal parenting challenges: ‘Challenges fulfilling maternal role and responsibility’; ‘Time management/work issues’; ‘Sleep deprivation’; ‘Personal change and adjustment’ and ‘Attributes of the child’. Using binomial logistic regression analyses, a range of child, maternal, family and contextual factors related to the reporting of the challenges were identified. The strongest predictors of maternal challenges were parity, which predicted four of the five main challenges, and ethnicity, which predicted three challenges. Health and development of the child was found to be associated with two of the five challenges, while maternal age, child’s negative affect, parenting confidence, parenting satisfaction, mother being in paid employment and gender of the child were each associated with one challenge. Our findings about the factors that may lead mothers of infants to be more likely to experience particular challenges are informative not only for health professionals working alongside mothers and their infants, but can potentially support the development of policies that enhance the well-being of New Zealand families.
KeywordsMothers Challenges Infants Maternal role Parity
Growing Up in New Zealand has been funded by the New Zealand Ministries of Social Development, Health, Education, Justice and Pacific Island Affairs; the former Ministry of Science Innovation and the former Department of Labour (now both part of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment); the former Ministry of Women’s Affairs (now the Ministry for Women); the Department of Corrections; the Families Commission (now known as the Social Policy Evaluation and Research Unit); Te Puni Kokiri; New Zealand Police; Sport New Zealand; the Housing New Zealand Corporation; and the former Mental Health Commission, The University of Auckland and Auckland UniServices Limited. Other support for the study has been provided by the NZ Health Research Council, Statistics New Zealand, the Office of the Children’s Commissioner and the Office of Ethnic Affairs. The study has been designed and conducted by the Growing Up in New Zealand study team, led by the University of Auckland. The authors acknowledge the contributions of the original study investigators: Susan M. B. Morton, Polly E. Atatoa Carr, Cameron C. Grant, Arier C. Lee, Dinusha K. Bandara, Jatender Mohal, Jennifer M. Kinloch, Johanna M. Schmidt, Mary R. Hedges, Vivienne C. Ivory, Te Kani R. Kingi, Renee Liang, Lana M. Perese, Elizabeth R. Peterson, Jan E. Pryor, Elaine Reese, Elizabeth M. Robinson, Karen E. Waldie, Clare R. Wall. The authors would also like to acknowledge Stephanie D'Souza for her help in identifying themes in the qualitative data. The views reported in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Growing Up in New Zealand Investigators.
The Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal study has been funded by the New Zealand Ministries of Social Development, Health, Education, Justice and Pacific Island Affairs; the former Ministry of Science Innovation and the former Department of Labour (now both part of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment); the former Ministry of Women’s Affairs (now the Ministry for Women); the Department of Corrections; the Families Commission (now known as the Social Policy Evaluation and Research Unit); Te Puni Kokiri; New Zealand Police; Sport New Zealand; the Housing New Zealand Corporation; and the former Mental Health Commission, The University of Auckland and Auckland UniServices Limited. Other support for the study has been provided by the NZ Health Research Council, Statistics New Zealand, the Office of the Children’s Commissioner and the Office of Ethnic Affairs. The current study that investigates the challenges of mothers of infants using data from the Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal study has not received any separate funding or grants.
M. T. C. collaborated on the design of the study and the qualitative data analyses, and led the quantitative analysis and the writing of the manuscript integrating feedback from the co-authors. E. R. P. led the design of the study, assisted with the qualitative and quantitative analyses, and the writing of the manuscript. N. A. assisted with the qualitative analyses and reviewed the manuscript. K. E. W., E. R., and S. M. B. M. assisted with the study design and gave feedback on the manuscript. S. M. B. M. is also Director of the study from which the data is drawn.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The Growing Up in New Zealand study had ethical approval of the Regional District Health Board in New Zealand and each data collection wave has been given approval by the Health and Disability Ethics Committee. All procedures using human subjects were conducted in accordance with the standards of the University of Auckland, the Regional District Health Board and the Health and Disability Ethics Committee.
Informed consent was obtained for all individual participants in the study.
- Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting stress index (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.Google Scholar
- Baddock, S. A., Galland, B. C., Bolton, D. P. G., Williams, S. M., & Taylor, B. J. (2006). Differences in infant and parent behaviors during routine bed sharing compared with cot sleeping in the home setting. Pediatrics, 117, 1599–1607. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Belsky, J, Barends, N. (2002). Personality and parenting. In: M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Being and becoming a parent (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 415–438). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 57, 289–300. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101.Google Scholar
- Bloomfield, L., Kendall, S., Applin, L., Dearnley, K., Edwards, L., & Hinshelwood, L., et al. (2005). A qualitative study exploring the experiences and views of mothers, health visitors and family support centre workers on the challenges and difficulties of parenting. Health & Social Care in the Community, 13, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00527.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bornstein, M. H. (2002). Parenting infants. In M. H.Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Children and parenting (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 3–44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Bornstein, M. H. (2013). Parenting x gender x culture x time. In W. B. Wilcox & K. K. Kline (Eds.), Gender and parenthood: Biological and social scientific perspectives (pp. 91–119). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Determinants of parenting. Developmental psychopathology, Four: 5, 1–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy405.
- Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C., Suwalsky, J. T. D., & Haynes, O. M. (2003). Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development: The Hollingshead four-factor index of social status and the socioeconomic index of occupations. In M. H. Bornstein & R. H. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (pp. 29–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Chen, X., Yang, F., & Fu, R. (2012). Culture and temperament. In M. Zentner & R. L. Shiner (Eds.), Handbook of temperament (pp. 462–478). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Dunst, C. J., Jenkins, V., & Trivette, C. M. (1984). Family support scale: Reliability and validity. Journal of Individual, Family, and Community Wellness, 1, 45–52.Google Scholar
- Eisenhower, A. S., Baker, B. L., & Blacher, J. (2005). Preschool children with intellectual disability: Syndrome specificity, behaviour problems, and maternal well-being. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00699.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hassall, R., Rose, J., & McDonald, J. (2005). Parenting stress in mothers of children with an intellectual disability: The effects of parental cognitions in relation to child characteristics and family support. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00673.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (2008). Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kawasaki, C., Nugent, J. K., Miyashita, H., Miyahara, H., & Brazelton, T. B. (1994). The cultural organization of infants’sleep. Children’s Environments, 135–141. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41514921.
- Leaper, C. (2002). Parenting girls and boys. In: M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Children and parenting (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 189–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Magnusan, K. A, Duncan, G. J. (2002). Parents in poverty. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Social conditions and applied parenting (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 95–122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- McKenna, J. J., Ball, H. L., & Gettler, L. T. (2007). Mother- infant cosleeping, breastfeeding and sudden infant death syndrome: What biological anthropology has discovered about normal infant sleep and pediatric sleep medicine. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 50, 133–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McKenna, J. J., Thoman, E. B., Anders, T. F., Sadeh, A., Schechtman, V. L., & Glotzbach, S. F. (1993). Infant-parent co-sleeping in an evolutionary perspective: Implications for understanding infant sleep development and the sudden infant death syndrome. Sleep, 16, 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20736.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mercer, R. T. (1986). First-time motherhood: Experiences from teens to forties. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Health (2015). Safe sleep. http://www.health.govt.nz/your-health/pregnancy-and-kids/first-year/helpful-advice-during-first-year/safe-sleep.
- Moore, M. R., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2002). Adolescent parenthood. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.) Handbook of parenting: Being and becoming a parent (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 173–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Moss, H. A. (1967). Sex, age, and state as determinants of mother-infant interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 1, 19–36. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23082717.Google Scholar
- Osborne, J. (2006). Bringing balance and technical accuracy to reporting odds ratios and the results of logistic regression analyses. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 11. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=11&n=7-1-6.
- Peterson, E. R., Mohal, J., Waldie, K. E., Reese, E., Atatoa Carr, P. E., Grant, C. C., & Morton, S. M. (2017). A cross-cultural analysis of the infant behavior questionnaire very short form: An item response theory analysis of infant temperament in New Zealand. Journal of Personality Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1288128.
- Podsiadlowski, A., & Fox, S. (2011). Collectivist value orientations among four ethnic groups: Collectivism in the New Zealand context. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 5–18. http://www.psychology.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/Padsiadlowski.pdf.Google Scholar
- Putnam, S. P., Helbig, A. L., Gartstein, M. A., Rothbart, M. K., & Leerkes, E. (2014). Development and assessment of short and very short forms of the Infant Behavior Questionnaire–Revised. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.841171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ratner, B. (2003). Statistical modeling and analysis for database marketing: Effective techniques for mining big data. Boca Raton, Fla.: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
- Rubin, K. H., & Chung, O. B. (2006). Parenting beliefs, behaviors, and parent–child relations: A cross-cultural perspective. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Salmond, C., Crampton, P., & Atkinson, J. (2007). NZDep 2006 Index of Deprivation (Dept of Public Health, Trans.). Wellington: University of Otago.Google Scholar
- Schluter, P. J., Paterson, J., & Percival, T. (2007). Infant care practices associated with sudden infant death syndrome: Findings from the Pacific Islands Families study. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 43, 388–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01085.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simpson, J., Duncanson, M., Oben, G., Wicken, A., & Pierse, N. (2016). Child Poverty Monitor 2016 Technical Report (National Report). Dunedin: New Zealand Child and Youth Epidemiology Service, University of Otago. https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/handle/10523/7006.Google Scholar
- Thunström, M. (1999). Severe sleep problems among infants: Family and infant characteristics. Ambulatory Child Health, 5, 27–41. https://www.ebscohost.com/.Google Scholar
- Vondra, J., & Belsky, J. (1995). Developmental origins of parenting: Personality and relationship forms. In T. Luster & L. Okagaki (Eds.), Parenting: An ecological perspective (pp. 33–250). Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Webb, H. J., Thomas, R., & Klag, S. (2015). A new measure of toddler parenting practices and associations with attachment and mothers’ sensitivity, competence, and enjoyment of parenting. Early Child Development and Care, 185, 1422–1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.1001753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar