Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 421–430 | Cite as

Parents’ Planning for Physical Activity for their Pre-School Aged Children: The Role of Psycho-Social Mediators and Moderators

  • Kyra Hamiltona
  • Ralf Schwarzer
Original Paper

Abstract

Despite the childhood benefits gained from engaging in adequate physical activity, Australian preschool-aged children are reported to spend little time being physically active. Parental planning is important to engaging preschool-aged children in physical activity. Behavioral barriers, normative support, and self-efficacy have been identified as key determinants of parental decision making. However, the interplay among these factors is not well understood. The aim of this study was to examine the role of these psycho-social variables on parents’ planning and behavior for their preschool-aged children’s physical activity. A survey at two points in time was conducted in 208 Australian parents (n= 139 mothers, M age = 36.43 years, SD = 5.04; n = 69 fathers, M age = 36.33 years, SD = 6.5) of children aged between 2 and 5 years. A conditional process analysis was conducted that integrates mediation and moderation analyses. The results showed that planning and behavioral barriers predicted behavior, with a moderation effect also identified; more planning helped compensate for barriers. Normative support predicted both planning and behavior. In addition, an interaction between normative support and self-efficacy emerged. Parents with high self-efficacy engaged in high levels of planning, independent of normative support. Low self-efficacy with low normative support resulted in the lowest amount of planning; however, in the absence of normative support a high level of self-efficacy could compensate for it. Current findings provide avenues for future research to develop interventions to test the efficacy of these mechanisms in promoting parents’ ability to ensure preschool-aged children are active.

Keywords

Self-efficacy Normative support Planning Social cognitive theory Exercise Children 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee approved the study. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.

Author Contributions

K.H. designed and executed the study, assisted with data analyses, and wrote the paper. R.S. analyzed the data, wrote the results section, and collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Adriaanse, M. A., de Ridder, D. T. D., & de Wit, J. B. F. (2009). Finding the crtical cue: Implementation intentions to change one’s diet work best when tailored to personally relevant reasons for unhealthy eating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 60–71.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208325612.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adriaanse, M. A., Oettingen, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., Hennes, E. P., de Ridder, D. T. D., & de Wit, J. B. F. (2010). When planning is not enough: Fighting unhealthy snacking habits by mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII). European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1277–1293.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AIHW. (2016). Australia’s health 2016—in brief. Australia’s health no. 15. Cat. no. AUS 201. Canberra: AIHW.Google Scholar
  4. Ajzen, J. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. Barz, M., Lange, D., Parschau, L., Lonsdale, C., Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2016). Self-efficacy, planning, and preparatory behaviours as joint predictors of physical activity: A conditional process analysis. Psychology & Health, 31, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biddle, S. J., Pearson, N., Ross, G. M., & Braithwaite, R. (2010). Tracking of sedentary behaviours of young people: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 51, 345–351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.07.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Certain, L. K., & Kahn, R. S. (2002). Prevalence, correlates, and trajectory of television viewing among infants and toddlers. Pediatrics, 109, 634–642.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. de Onis, M., Blossner, M., & Borghi, E. (2010). Global prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity among preschool children. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 92, 1257–1264.  https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.29786.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Department of Health. (2014). Australia’s physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines. Canberra. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-pubhlth-strateg-active-evidence.htm.
  11. Dishman, R. K., Saunders, R. P., Motl, R. W., Dowda, M., & Pate, R. R. (2008). Self-efficacy moderates the relation between declines in physical activity and perceived social support in high school girls. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 441–451.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsn100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.54.7.493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38002-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagger, M. S., & Luszczynska, A. (2014). Implementation intention and action planning interventions in health contexts: State of the research and proposals for the way forward. Applied Psychology, 6, 1–47.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton, K., Bonham, M., Bishara, J., Kroon, J., & Schwarzer, R. (2017a). Translating dental flossing intentions into behavior: A longitudinal investigation of the mediating effect of planning and self-efficacy on young adults. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 420–427.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-016-9605-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton, K., Cox, S., & White, K. M. (2012c). Testing a model of physical activity among mothers and fathers of young children: integrating self-determined motivation, planning, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton, K., Daniels, L., Murray, N., White, K. M., & Walsh, A. (2012a). Mothers’ perceptions of introducing solids to their infant at six months of age: Identifying critical belief-based targets to promote adherence to current infant feeding guidelines. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 121–131.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311409786.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton, K., & Hagger, M. S. (2017). Effects of self-efficacy on healthy eating depends on normative support: A prospective study of long-haul truck drivers. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Advanced online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-017-9685-9.
  19. Hamilton, K., Hatzis, D., Kavanagh, D. J., & White, K. M. (2015). Exploring parents’ beliefs about their young child’s physical activity and screen time behaviours. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 2638–2652.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0066-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton, K., Kirkpatrick, A., Rebar, A., & Hagger, M. S. (2017b). Child sun safety: application of the Integrated Behaviour Change model. Health Psychology, 36, 916–926.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamilton, K., Spinks, T., White, K. M., Kavanagh, D. J., & Walsh, A. M. (2016). A psychosocial analysis of parents’ decisions for limiting their young child’s screen time: An examination of attitudes, social norms and roles, and control perceptions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 285–301.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamilton, K., Thomson, C. E., & White, K. M. (2013). Promoting active lifestyles in young children: Investigating mothers’ decisions about their child’s physical activity and screen time behaviours. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17, 968–976.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1081-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamilton, K., Warner, L. M., & Schwarzer, R. (2017c). The role of self-efficacy and friend support on adolescent intentions and vigorous exercise. Health Education & Behavior, 44, 175–181.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198116648266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamilton, K., & White, K. M. (2010). Understanding parental physical activity: Meanings, habits, and social role influence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 275–285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamilton, K., & White, K. M. (2012). Social influences and the physical activity intentions of parents of young-children families: An extended Theory of Planned Behavior approach. Journal of Family Issues, 33, 1351–1372.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x12437151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamilton, K., White, K. M., & Cuddihy, T. (2012d). Using a single-item physical activity measure to describe and validate parents’ physical activity patterns. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83, 340–345.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599865.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamilton, K., White, K. M., Young, R., Hawkes, A., Starfelt, L. C., & Leske, S. (2012b). Identifying critical sun-protective beliefs among Australian adults. Health Education Research, 27, 834–843.  https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cys093.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hesketh, K. D., & Campbell, K. J. (2010). Interventions to prevent obesity in 0–5 year olds: an updated systematic review of the literature. Obesity, 18, S27–S35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hinkley, T., Salmon, J. O., Okely, A. D., Crawford, D., & Hesketh, K. (2012). Preschoolers’ physical activity, screen time, and compliance with recommendations. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 44, 458–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hodges, E. A., Smith, C., Tidwell, S., & Berry, D. (2013). Promoting physical activity in preschoolers to prevent obesity: A review of the literature. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 28, 3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2012.01.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Irwin, J. D., He, M., Bouck, L. M., Tucker, P., & Pollett, G. L. (2005). Preschoolers’ physical activity behaviours: parents’ perspectives. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96, 299–303.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackson, C., Lawton, R., Knapp, P., Raynor, D. K., Conner, M., Lowe, C., & Closs, S. J. (2005). Beyond intention: Do specific plans increase health behaviours in patients in primary care? A study of fruit and vegetable consumption. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 2383–2391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones, T. L., & Prinz, R. J. (2005). Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 341–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.12.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision and social change. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 330–344). New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
  36. Metcalf, B., Henley, W., & Wilkin, T. (2012). Effectiveness of intervention on physical activity of children: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with objectively measured outcomes. British Medical Journal, 345, 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5888.Google Scholar
  37. Mullan, B., Henderson, J., Kothe, E., Allom, V., Orbell, S., & Hamilton, K. (2016). The role of habit and perceived control on health behaviour among pregnant women. American Journal of Health Behavior, 40, 291–301.  https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.40.3.1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Orbell, S., Hodgkins, S., & Sheeran, P. (1997). Implementation intentions and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 945–954.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297239004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pate, R. R., Baranowski, T., Dowda, M., & Trost, S. G. (1996). Tracking of physical activity in young children. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 28, 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prince, S. A., Adamo, K. B., Hamel, M., Hardt, J., Connor Gorber, S., & Tremblay, M. (2008). A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Internationl Journal of Behavhaioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5, 56  https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rutter, D. R., Steadman, L., & Quine, L. (2006). An implementation intentions intervention to increase uptake of mammography. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 32, 127–134.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm3202_10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwarzer, R. (2008). Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology, 57, 1–29.Google Scholar
  43. Schwarzer, R., & Luszczynska, A. (2016). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancies. In Y. Benyamini, M. Johnston & E. C. Karademas (Eds.), Assessment in health psychology (pp. 31–44). Göttingen/Boston: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  44. Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention—behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sheeran, P., Harris, P., Vaughan, J., Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2013). Gone exercising: Mental contrasting promotes physical activity among overweight, middle-aged, low-SES fishermen. Health Psychology, 32, 802–809.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sheeran, P., Webb, T. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005). The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 87–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Skår, S., Sniehotta, F. F., Molloy, G. J., Prestwich, A., & Araujo-Soares, V. (2011). Do brief online planning interventions increase physical activity amongst university students? A randomised controlled trial. Psychology & Health, 26, 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sniehotta, F. F. (2009). Towards a theory of intentional behaviour change: Plans, planning, and self-regulation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 261–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sniehotta, F. F., Schwarzer, R., Scholz, U., & Schüz, B. (2005). Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: theory and assessment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 565–576.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spinks, T., & Hamilton, K. (2015). Investigating key beliefs guiding mothers’ dietary decisions for their 2–3 year old. Appetite, 89, 167–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Symons Downs, D., & Hausenblas, H. A. (2005). Elicitation studies and the theory of planned behavior: A systematic review of exercise beliefs. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 6, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Teng, Y., & Mak, W. W. S. (2011). The role of planning and self-efficacy in condom use among men who have sex with men: An application of the Health Action Process Approach model. Health Psychology, 30, 119–128.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776–793.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296228002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomson, C. E., White, K. M., & Hamilton, K. (2012). Investigating mothers’ decisions about their child’s sun-protective behaviour using the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 1001–1010.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311433905.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Trudeau, F., Laurencelle, L., & Shephard, R. (2004). Tracking of physical activity from childhood to adulthood. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36, 1937–1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  57. Walsh, A., Hamilton, K., White, K. M., & Hyde, M. (2015). Use of online health information to manage children’s health care: a prospective study investigating parental decisions. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 131  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0793-4..CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Wareham, N. J., van Sluijs, E. M. F., & Ekelund, U. (2005). Physical activity and obesity prevention: a review of the current evidence. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 64, 229–247.  https://doi.org/10.1079/Pns2005423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Warner, L. M., Ziegelmann, J. P., Schüz, B., Wurm, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2011). Synergistic effect of social support and self-efficacy on physical exercise in older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 19, 249–261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. White, K. M., Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2002). Improving attitude-behavior correspondence through exposure to normative support from a salient ingroup. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. World Health Organization (WHO). (2012). Population-based approaches to childhood obesity prevention. Geneva: WHO Press. 9241504781.Google Scholar
  62. Zhou, G., Gan, Y., Hamilton, K., & Schwarzer, R. (2017). The role of social support and self-efficacy for planning fruit and vegetable intake. Journal of Nutrition Education & Behavior, 49, 100–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2016.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhou, G., Gan, Y., Miao, M., Hamilton, K., Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2015a). The role of action control and action planning on fruit and vegetable consumption. Appetite, 91, 64–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhou, G., Jiang, T., Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2015b). Improving hand hygiene behaviour among adolescents by a planning intervention. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 20, 824–831.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2015.1024138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhou, G., Sun, C., Knoll, N., Hamilton, K., & Schwarzer, R. (2015c). Self-efficacy, planning and action control in an oral self-care intervention. Health Education Research, 30, 671–681.  https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyv032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhou, G., Zhang, L., Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2014). Facilitating sunscreen use among Chinese young adults: Less-motivated persons benefit from a planning intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22(4), 443–451.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9458-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Applied Psychology, Menzies Health Institute QueenslandGriffith UniversitySouthportAustralia
  2. 2.School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Health Psychology and Behavioural Medicine Research GroupCurtin UniversityBentleyAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Educational Science and PsychologyFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Department of Clinical, Health, and Rehabilitation PsychologySWPS University of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations