Parents’ Planning for Physical Activity for their Pre-School Aged Children: The Role of Psycho-Social Mediators and Moderators
- 349 Downloads
Despite the childhood benefits gained from engaging in adequate physical activity, Australian preschool-aged children are reported to spend little time being physically active. Parental planning is important to engaging preschool-aged children in physical activity. Behavioral barriers, normative support, and self-efficacy have been identified as key determinants of parental decision making. However, the interplay among these factors is not well understood. The aim of this study was to examine the role of these psycho-social variables on parents’ planning and behavior for their preschool-aged children’s physical activity. A survey at two points in time was conducted in 208 Australian parents (n = 139 mothers, M age = 36.43 years, SD = 5.04; n = 69 fathers, M age = 36.33 years, SD = 6.5) of children aged between 2 and 5 years. A conditional process analysis was conducted that integrates mediation and moderation analyses. The results showed that planning and behavioral barriers predicted behavior, with a moderation effect also identified; more planning helped compensate for barriers. Normative support predicted both planning and behavior. In addition, an interaction between normative support and self-efficacy emerged. Parents with high self-efficacy engaged in high levels of planning, independent of normative support. Low self-efficacy with low normative support resulted in the lowest amount of planning; however, in the absence of normative support a high level of self-efficacy could compensate for it. Current findings provide avenues for future research to develop interventions to test the efficacy of these mechanisms in promoting parents’ ability to ensure preschool-aged children are active.
KeywordsSelf-efficacy Normative support Planning Social cognitive theory Exercise Children
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee approved the study. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.
K.H. designed and executed the study, assisted with data analyses, and wrote the paper. R.S. analyzed the data, wrote the results section, and collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- Adriaanse, M. A., de Ridder, D. T. D., & de Wit, J. B. F. (2009). Finding the crtical cue: Implementation intentions to change one’s diet work best when tailored to personally relevant reasons for unhealthy eating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208325612.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adriaanse, M. A., Oettingen, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., Hennes, E. P., de Ridder, D. T. D., & de Wit, J. B. F. (2010). When planning is not enough: Fighting unhealthy snacking habits by mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII). European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1277–1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- AIHW. (2016). Australia’s health 2016—in brief. Australia’s health no. 15. Cat. no. AUS 201. Canberra: AIHW.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Department of Health. (2014). Australia’s physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines. Canberra. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-pubhlth-strateg-active-evidence.htm.
- Dishman, R. K., Saunders, R. P., Motl, R. W., Dowda, M., & Pate, R. R. (2008). Self-efficacy moderates the relation between declines in physical activity and perceived social support in high school girls. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsn100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Eyler et al. (2002) http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/12487145.
- Hamilton, K., Bonham, M., Bishara, J., Kroon, J., & Schwarzer, R. (2017a). Translating dental flossing intentions into behavior: A longitudinal investigation of the mediating effect of planning and self-efficacy on young adults. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 420–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-016-9605-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamilton, K., Daniels, L., Murray, N., White, K. M., & Walsh, A. (2012a). Mothers’ perceptions of introducing solids to their infant at six months of age: Identifying critical belief-based targets to promote adherence to current infant feeding guidelines. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311409786.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamilton, K., & Hagger, M. S. (2017). Effects of self-efficacy on healthy eating depends on normative support: A prospective study of long-haul truck drivers. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-017-9685-9.
- Hamilton, K., Spinks, T., White, K. M., Kavanagh, D. J., & Walsh, A. M. (2016). A psychosocial analysis of parents’ decisions for limiting their young child’s screen time: An examination of attitudes, social norms and roles, and control perceptions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamilton, K., Thomson, C. E., & White, K. M. (2013). Promoting active lifestyles in young children: Investigating mothers’ decisions about their child’s physical activity and screen time behaviours. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17, 968–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1081-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision and social change. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 330–344). New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
- Prince, S. A., Adamo, K. B., Hamel, M., Hardt, J., Connor Gorber, S., & Tremblay, M. (2008). A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Internationl Journal of Behavhaioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5, 56 https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schwarzer, R. (2008). Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology, 57, 1–29.Google Scholar
- Schwarzer, R., & Luszczynska, A. (2016). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancies. In Y. Benyamini, M. Johnston & E. C. Karademas (Eds.), Assessment in health psychology (pp. 31–44). Göttingen/Boston: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Walsh, A., Hamilton, K., White, K. M., & Hyde, M. (2015). Use of online health information to manage children’s health care: a prospective study investigating parental decisions. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 131 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0793-4..CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization (WHO). (2012). Population-based approaches to childhood obesity prevention. Geneva: WHO Press. 9241504781.Google Scholar