Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 2852–2864 | Cite as

Happy Family Kitchen: Behavioral Outcomes of a Brief Community-Based Family Intervention in Hong Kong

  • Henry C. Y. Ho
  • Moses Mui
  • Alice Wan
  • Sunita M. Stewart
  • Carol Yew
  • Tai Hing Lam
  • Sophia S. Chan
Original Paper

Abstract

Positive psychology interventions commonly involve behavioral exercises to improve psychosocial well-being. Intervention effect on behavior is unclear. The Happy Family Kitchen project, one of the community-based brief intervention projects under The FAMILY: A Jockey Club Initiative for a Harmonious Society, was conducted in Hong Kong to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a positive psychology family intervention. We have previously reported positive intervention effects on family communication, family well-being, and subjective happiness. This paper aims to explore the effectiveness of the intervention on behavioral outcomes and their associations with psychosocial well-being. A total of 23 social service units organized and conducted intervention programs for 1419 individuals from 612 families in Hong Kong. Each intervention was developed with emphasis on one of five positive psychology themes: gratitude, flow, happiness, health, and savoring. Intervention outcomes were assessed at pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention. Results showed that family communication time and frequency of meal preparation with family members increased with sustainable small effects up to 12 weeks. Theme-specific behavior change was observed in the gratitude, flow, and happiness interventions, respectively. Family communication time, frequency of eating with family members, and theme-specific behaviors, including gratitude, flow, happiness behavior, health attitude, and health behavior, were positively associated with psychosocial well-being. Qualitative data provided additional evidence of effectiveness with in-depth insights into behavior change. The positive associations between target behaviors and well-being suggest that improvements in well-being as a function of the intervention may be associated with behavior change.

Keywords

Community-based intervention Positive psychology Behavior change Family communication Psychosocial well-being 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank our community collaborators and research participants for their coordination, implementation, and participation in the community programs. We are also grateful to our research team (Paul Wong, Jenny Leung, Terence Li, and Joe Chiu) for their important contributions. This study was a part of the project entitled “FAMILY: A Jockey Club Initiative for a Harmonious Society”, which was funded by the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust. The funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, preparation of the manuscript, or decision to publish.

Author Contributions

H.H. performed the statistical analysis, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript; M.M. participated in the design, implementation, and coordination; A.W. participated in the design, implementation, and coordination; S.S. contributed to the conceptualization and writing of the manuscript; C.Y. participated in the design and implementation; T.H.L. participated in the design, coordination, and conceptualization and writing of the manuscript; and S.C. participated in the design, coordination, and conceptualization. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Anshel, M. H., Brinthaupt, T. M., & Kang, M. (2010). The disconnected values model improves mental well-being and fitness in an employee wellness program. Behavioral Medicine, 36(4), 113–122. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2010.489080.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blankers, M., Koeter, M. W., & Schippers, G. M. (2010). Missing data approaches in eHealth research: Simulation study and a tutorial for nonmathematically inclined researchers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(5), e54 doi: 10.2196/jmir.1448.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR (2010). Thematic household survey report No. 44: Relationships among family members.Google Scholar
  5. Christian, M. S., Evans, C. E. L., Hancock, N., Nykjaer, C., & Cade, J. E. (2013). Family meals can help children reach their 5 A day: A cross-sectional survey of children’s dietary intake from London primary schools. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 67(4), 332–338. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 39(1), 1–38. doi: 10.2307/2984875.Google Scholar
  9. Dubois, C. M., Beach, S. R., Kashdan, T. B., Nyer, M. B., Park, E. R., Celano, C. M., & Huffman, J. C. (2012). Positive psychological attributes and cardiac outcomes: Associations, mechanisms, and interventions. Psychosomatics, 53(4), 303–318. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2012.04.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisenberg, M. E., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Fulkerson, J. A., & Story, M. (2008). Family meals and substance use: Is there a long-term protective association? Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(2), 151–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.01.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4 ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, L. D., Dixon, D. O., Herson, J., Frankowski, R. K., Hearron, M. S., & Peace, K. E. (1990). Intention to treat in clinical trials. In K. E. Peace (Ed.), Statistical issues in drug research and development. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  14. Fulkerson, J. A., Neumark-Sztainer, D., & Story, M. (2006). Adolescent and parent views of family meals. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106(4), 526–532. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.01.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fulkerson, J. A., Pasch, K. E., Stigler, M. H., Farbakhsh, K., Perry, C. L., & Komro, K. A. (2010). Longitudinal associations between family dinner and adolescent perceptions of parent–child communication among racially diverse urban youth. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(3), 261–270. doi:10.1037/a0019311.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Galvin, K. M., Bylund, C. L., & Brommel, B. J. (2004). Family communication: Cohesion and change (6th ed.). Old Tappan, USA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkins, N. A., Smith, T., Zhao, L., Rodriguez, J., Berkowitz, Z., & Stein, K. D. (2010). Health-related behavior change after cancer: Results of the American Cancer Society’s Studies of Cancer Survivors (SCS). Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 4(1), 20–32. doi: 10.1007/s11764-009-0104-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ho, H. C. Y., Mui, M., Wan, A., Ng, Y.-l, Stewart, S. M., Yew, C., et al. (2016). Happy family kitchen: A community-based research for enhancing family communication and well-being in Hong Kong. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(6), 752–762. doi:10.1037/fam0000233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho, H. C. Y., Yeung, D. Y., & Kwok, S. Y. C. L. (2014). Development and evaluation of the positive psychology intervention for older adults. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(3), 187–197. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2014.888577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hurley, D. B., & Kwon, P. (2012). Results of a study to increase savoring the moment: Differential impact on positive and negative outcomes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(4), 579–588. doi:10.1007/s10902-011-9280-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. doi: 10.1177/1558689806298224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kauffman, C., & Silberman, J. (2009). Finding and fostering the positive in relationships: Positive interventions in couples therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 520–531. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20594.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of family communication. Communication Theory, 12(1), 70–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00260.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. 3 edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Lai‐Yeung, T. W. L. (2015). Hong Kong parents’ perceptions of the transference of food preparation skills. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(2), 117–124. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155. doi: 10.1023/A:1006824100041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nan, H., Ni, M. Y., Lee, P. H., Tam, W. W., Lam, T. H., Leung, G. M., & McDowell, I. (2014). Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Subjective Happiness Scale: evidence from the Hong Kong FAMILY Cohort. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(4), 646–652. doi:10.1007/s12529-014-9389-3.Google Scholar
  28. Odou, N., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The efficacy of positive psychology interventions to increase well-being and the role of mental imagery ability. Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 111–129. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9919-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olson, D. H., & Barnes, H. L. (2004). Family communication. In D. H. Olson, D. M. Gorall, & J. Tiesel (Eds.), FACES IV packge. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.Google Scholar
  30. Park, C. L., & Gaffey, A. E. (2007). Relationships between psychosocial factors and health behavior change in cancer survivors: An integrative review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 34(2), 115–134. doi: 10.1007/BF02872667.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC; New York, NY: American Psychological Association, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Pietrowsky, R., & Mikutta, J. (2012). Effects of positive psychology interventions in depressive patients—A randomized control study. Psychology, 3(12), 1067–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prochaska, J. O., Evers, K. E., Castle, P. H., Johnson, J. L., Prochaska, J. M., Rula, E. Y., et al. (2012). Enhancing multiple domains of well-being by decreasing multiple health risk behaviors: A randomized clinical trial. Population Health Management, 15(5), 276–286. doi: 10.1089/pop.2011.0060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong (2010). FAMILY: A Jockey Club initiative for a harmonious society, HKU study on family communication patterns in Hong Kong: More praise, more happiness [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.family.org.hk/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/press-release_Eng.pdf.Google Scholar
  35. Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Messersmith, A. S. (2008). A meta-analytical review of family communication patterns and their associations with information processing, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Communication Monographs, 75(3), 248–269. doi: 10.1080/03637750802256318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Segrin, C. (2006). Family interactions and well-being: Integrative perspectives. Journal of Family Communication, 6(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1207/s15327698jfc0601_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Seligman, M. E. P., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2004). The values in action (VIA) classification of character strengths. Ricerche di Psicologia, 27(1), 63–78.Google Scholar
  40. Seligman, M. E. P., Rashid, T., & Parks, A. C. (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61(8), 774–788. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.774.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410–421. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sexton, T. L., & Schuster, R. A. (2008). The role of positive emotion in the therapeutic process of family therapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 18(2), 233–247. doi:10.1037/1053-0479.18.2.233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheridan, S. M., Warnes, E. D., Cowan, R. J., Schemm, A. V., & Clarke, B. L. (2004). Family-centered positive psychology: Focusing on strengths to build student success. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 467–487. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20593.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sobal, J. (2000). Sociability and meals: Facilitation, commensality, and interaction. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Dimensions of the meal: The science, culture, business, and art of eating (pp. 119–133). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.Google Scholar
  46. Soong, C. S., Wang, M. P., Mui, M., Viswanath, K., Lam, T. H., & Chan, S. S. (2015). A “Community Fit” community-based participatory research program for family health, happiness, and harmony: Design and implementation. JMIR Research Protocols, 4(4), e126 doi: 10.2196/resprot.4369.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Stewart, S. M., Fabrizio, C. S., Hirschmann, M. R., & Lam, T. H. (2012). Developing community-based preventive interventions in Hong Kong: A description of the first phase of the family project. BMC Public Health, 12, 106 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang, M. P., Wang, X., Viswanath, K., Wan, A., Lam, T. H., & Chan, S. S. (2014). Digital inequalities of family life information seeking and family well-being among Chinese adults in Hong Kong: A population survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(10), e227 doi: 10.2196/jmir.3386.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry C. Y. Ho
    • 1
  • Moses Mui
    • 2
  • Alice Wan
    • 1
  • Sunita M. Stewart
    • 3
  • Carol Yew
    • 4
  • Tai Hing Lam
    • 1
  • Sophia S. Chan
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Public HealthUniversity of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong
  2. 2.Service Development, Hong Kong Council of Social ServiceWanchaiHong Kong
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at DallasDallasUSA
  4. 4.United Centre of Emotional Health and Positive Living, United Christian Nethersole Community Health ServiceKowloonHong Kong
  5. 5.School of NursingUniversity of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations