Helicopter Parenting and Emerging Adult Self-Efficacy: Implications for Mental and Physical Health
- 6.3k Downloads
Helicopter parenting has become an increasing concern among practitioners, college administrators, and professors. Further, some research has indicated that this form of parenting may have a deleterious effect on emerging adult college students’ mental health. This study examines the factor structure of the Helicopter Parenting Behaviors measure, a recent scale developed to examine intrusive and supportive parenting behaviors, by using confirmatory factor analysis. We utilized a self-determination theoretical framework to replicate and expand current research regarding the impact of helicopter parenting and autonomy supportive parenting on emerging adult mental and physical well-being. Further, we examined self-efficacy as a mechanism for helicopter parenting and autonomy supportive parenting to impact well-being, using structural equation modeling with a sample of 461 emerging adult college students from a large southeastern, United States university. The two-factor structure of the Helicopter Parenting Behaviors measure was confirmed, indicating helicopter parenting and autonomy supportive parenting are two unique, but related, constructs. Both autonomy supportive parenting and helicopter parenting were found to have indirect effects on anxiety, depression, life satisfaction, and physical health through self-efficacy. Results also indicated autonomy supportive parenting was directly related to life satisfaction and physical health when accounting for self-efficacy, whereas helicopter parenting was not directly related to well-being. This study adds to the extant literature by its’ application of a family-level lens to the self-determination theory, its’ advancement of parenting behaviors measurement, and its’ exploration of the continued influence of parenting during emerging adulthood.
KeywordsHelicopter parenting Autonomy support Emerging adult Self-determination Self-efficacy
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Barber, B. K., Stolz, H. E., Olsen, J. A., Collins, W. A., & Burchinal, M. (2005). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: Assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70(4), 1–147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 261–267.Google Scholar
- Carmines, E., & McIver, J. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Cline, F. W., & Fay, J. (1990). Parenting with love and logic: Teaching children responsibility. Colorado Springs: Pinon Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Douce, L. A., & Keeling, R. P. (2014). A strategic primer on college student mental health. Retrieved from the American Psychological Association website. http://www.apa.org/pubs/newsletters/access/2014/10-14/college-mental-health.pdf.
- Gallagher, R. P. (2014). National survey of college counseling centers 2014. Alexandria: The International Association of Counseling Services Inc.Google Scholar
- Hair, J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
- IBM. (2013). IBM SPSS Missing Values 22. Chicago: IBM Corporation.Google Scholar
- Kenny, D. A. (2015). Mediation. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm.
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Martinek, D. (2012). Motivating teachers. Sociology Study, 2, 445–457.Google Scholar
- Patock-Peckham, J. A., & Morgan-Lopez, A. A. (2009). Meditational links among parenting styles, perceptions of parental confidence, self-esteem, and depression on alcohol-related problems in emerging adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70, 215–226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Reifman, A., & Oblad, T. (2012). College students’ and parents communication and views of proper assistance with school-related matters. Association of Higher Education Parent/Family Program Professionals Journal, 3, 2–19.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., Patrick, H., Deci, E. L., & Williams, G. C. (2008). Health behaviour change and its maintenance: Interventions based on self-determination theory. The European Health Psychologist, 10, 2–5.Google Scholar
- Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., Geary, K. A., Erchull, M. J., & Tashner, T. (2014). Helping or hovering? The effects of helicopter parenting on college student’s well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 543–557.Google Scholar
- Schwarzer, R., & Fuchs, R. (1996). Self-efficacy and health behaviours. In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (pp. 163–196). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software].Google Scholar
- Shoup, R., Gonyea, R. M., & Kuh, G. D. (2009). Helicopter parents: Examining the impact of highly involved parents on student engagement and educational outcomes. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Atlanta Georgia.Google Scholar
- Somers, P., & Settle, J. (2010). The helicopter parent: Research toward a typology. College and University: The Journal of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars, 86, 18–27.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- van Ingen, D. J., Freiheit, S. R., Steinfeldt, J. A., Moore, L. L., Wimer, D. J., Knutt, A. D., & Roberts, A. (2015). Helicopter parenting: The effect of an overbearing caregiving style on peer attachment and self-efficacy. American Counseling Association, 18, 7–20.Google Scholar
- Zambianchi, M., & Bitti, P. E. R. (2014). The role of proactive coping strategies, time perspective, perceived efficacy on affect regulation, divergent thinking and family communication in promoting social well-being in emerging adulthood. Social Indicators Research, 116, 493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zimmerman, M., Ruggero, C. J., Chelminski, I., Young, D., Posternak, M. A., Friedman, M., & Attiullah, N. (2006). Developing brief scales for use in clinical practice: The reliability and validity of single-item self-report measures of depression symptom severity, psychosocial impairment due to depression, and quality of life. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 67, 1536–1541.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar