Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 25, Issue 7, pp 2268–2278 | Cite as

Parent Perceptions of Connectedness in a Full Service Community School Project

  • Ming-E Chen
  • Jeffrey Alvin AndersonEmail author
  • Lara Watkins
Original Paper

Abstract

Quality partnerships between parents and schools are widely considered necessary components of effective educational approaches for improving student academic performance. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of research that has examined the effect of school-community collaboration on parent–teacher relationships or parent involvement. The Providence Full Service Community Schools (PFSCS) model, created to connect schools, families, and communities, provided comprehensive services, including family literacy, out-of-school time, wraparound case management, health outreach, and a focus on family engagement. To understand how community service integration, the key component of PFSCS, can improve parent involvement as social capital, the Parent–Teacher Involvement Questionnaire was used to measure perceptions of the amount and type of contact that occur between parents and teachers; parent interest and comfort in talking with teachers; parent satisfaction with their children’s school; and the extent of parental involvement in their child’s education. The PTIQ was administered during the fall of each participating school’s first year of PFSCS implementation and then again during each subsequent fall. Descriptive analyses and one-way ANOVAs were conducted for each subscale of the PTIQ and then for each subscale by school. Overall, findings were mixed and, perhaps most notably, three of the four subscales showed an initial score decrease followed by longer term improvements. While some caution in interpretation is warranted due to design limitations, our primary recommendation is for schools to focus on building trusting relationships with parents and also that data collection, such as was used in this study, can facilitate these efforts. Likewise, the importance of documenting school and intervention contexts is reiterated.

Keywords

Parent involvement Parent–teacher relationships Interagency collaboration School-based social services Full service community schools Social capital 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by a grant from Dorcas Place International, via the U.S. Department of Education Office of Community Schools, to Indiana University, for evaluation of the Providence Full Service Community Schools project.

References

  1. Anderson, J. A., Chen, M. E., Min, M., & Watkins, L. (2016). Successes, challenges, and future directions for an urban full service community schools initiative. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. A., Houser, J., & Howland, A. (2010). The full purpose partnership model for promoting academic and socio-emotional success in schools. The School Community Journal, 20(1), 31–53. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ891831.pdf
  3. Anderson, J. A., Howland, A., & McCoach, B. (2015). Parental characteristics and resiliency in identification rates for special education. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(2), 63–72. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2013.837811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blank, M. J., Melaville, A., & Shah, B. P. (2003). Making the difference: Research and practice in community schools. Washington, DC: Coalition for Community Schools. http://www.communityschools.org/assets/1/Page/CCSFullReport.pdf
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bundy, A. L. (2005). Aligning systems to create full-service schools: The Boston experience, so far. New Directions for Youth Development, 2005(107), 73–80. doi: 10.1002/yd.131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman, J. (1987). Families and schools. Educational Researcher, 16, 32–38. doi: 10.3102/0013189X016006032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Suppl.), 95–120. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243
  9. Dewey, J. (2011). The school and society and the child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dryfoos, J. (1995). Full service schools: Revolution or fad? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5(2), 147–172. http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=94e607dd-ac85-4e50-a1c6-4992c1507ab6%40sessionmgr4005&vid=9&hid=4210
  11. Dryfoos, J. (2002). Full-service community schools: Creating new institutions. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(5), 393–399. doi: 10.1177/003172170208300515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2002). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press INC.Google Scholar
  13. Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 31(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1023/A:1009048817385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fantuzzo, J., McWayne, C., Perry, M. A., & Childs, S. (2004). Multiple dimensions of family involvement and their relations to behavioral and learning competencies for urban, low-income children. School Psychology Review, 33, 467–480. http://eportfoliocathymendoza.pbworks.com/f/Fantuzzo.pdf
  15. Fast Track. (2003). Parentteacher involvement questionnaire: Parent version (original and grade 4+). Durham, NC: Duke University. http://www.fasttrackproject.org/techrept/p/ptp/
  16. Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. http://www.sedl.org/connections/resources/evidence.pdf
  17. Hill, N. E., & Craft, S. A. (2003). Parent–school involvement and school performance: Mediated pathways among socioeconomically comparable African American and Euro-American families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 74–83. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ho Sui-Chi, E. & Willms, D. J. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eighth-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69, 126–141. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2112802
  19. Houser, J. H. W. (2014). Community- and school-sponsored program participation and academic achievement in a full-service community school. Education and Urban Society,. doi: 10.1177/0013124514533792.Google Scholar
  20. Howland, A., Anderson, J. A., Smiley, A. D., & Abbott, D. (2006). School liaisons: Bridging the gap between home and school. The School Community Journal 16(2), 47–68. http://www.adi.org/journal/fw06/howlandandersonsmileyabbottfall2006.pdf.
  21. Jeynes, W. H. (2011). Parental involvement and academic success. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Kim, E. M., Coutts, M. J., Holmes, S. R., Sheridan, S. M., Ransom, K. A., Sjuts, T. M., & Rispoli, K. M. (2012). Parent involvement and family-school partnerships: Examining the content, processes, and outcomes of structural versus relationship-based approaches. CYFS Working Paper No. 2012-6: Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families and Schools. http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=a51201b6-bfc9-4eb0-8aa2-3e29309eb685%40sessionmgr112&crlhashurl=login.aspx%253fdirect%253dtrue%2526db%253deric%2526AN%253dED537851%2526site%253dehost-live%2526scope%253dsite&hid=114&vid=0&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=eric&AN=ED537851
  23. Kim, E. M., Sheridan, S. M., Kwon, K., & Koziol, N. (2013). Parent beliefs and children’s social-behavioral functioning: The mediating role of parent–teacher relationships. Journal of School Psychology, 51(2), 175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.01.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Leonard, J. (2011). Using Bronfenbrenner’s ecological Theory to understand community partnerships: A historical case study of one urban high school. Urban Education, 46(5), 987–1010. doi: 10.1177/0042085911400337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Majerus, T. C. (2011). Development of a parent–teacher relationship survey (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri–Columbia). Retrieved from https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/14424/research.pdf?sequence=2
  26. McNeal, R. B. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces, 78(l), 117–144. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3005792
  27. Miller-Johnson, S. & Maumary-Gremaud, A. (1995). ParentTeacher Involvement: Parent Version (Fast Track Project Technical Report). Durham, NC: Duke University. http://www.fasttrackproject.org/techrept/p/ptp/ptp2tech.pdf
  28. Nzinga-Johnson, S., Baker, J. A., & Aupperlee, J. (2009). Teacher–parent relationships and school involvement among racially and educationally diverse parents of kindergartners. The Elementary School Journal, 110(1), 81–91. doi: 10.1086/598844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sawilowsky, S. S., & Blair, R. C. (1992). A more realistic look at the robustness and Type II error properties of the t test to departures from population normality. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 352–360. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Topping, K. J. (1992). Short- and long-term follow-up of parental involvement in reading projects. British Educational Research Journal, 18, 369–379. doi: 10.1080/0141192920180404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trepanier, N. S., Pare, M., Petrakos, H., & Drouin, C. (2008). A proposal for involving teachers in school integrated services in the Province of Quebec. School Community Journal, 18(1), 105–122. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ798685.pdf
  32. U. S. Department of Education. (2015). Frequently asked Questions about FSCSs (Revised 6/5/2014). http://www2.ed.gov/programs/communityschools/faq.html
  33. Waddock, S. A. (1995). Not by schools alone: Sharing responsibility for America’s education reform. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
  34. Walsh, M. E., & Park-Taylor, J. (2003). Comprehensive schooling and interprofessional collaboration: Theory, research, and practice. Yearbook of The National Society for The Study of Educatoin, 102(2), 8–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7984.2003.tb00064.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Watkins, L. L., & Anderson, J. A. (2013, May). The Parent and Teacher Involvement Questionnaire (PTIQ) Summative Report, Data Years 2009–2012. Prepared for the Steering Committee. Providence Full Service Community Schools.Google Scholar
  36. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151–208. doi: 10.1023/A:1006884930135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and InstructionIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyBridgewater State UniversityBridgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations