Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 1559–1569 | Cite as

Reasons for the “after-school pressure cooker” in Affluent Communities: It’s Not How Much Time, but Why

  • Edin T. Randall
  • Lea V. Travers
  • Jenna B. Shapiro
  • Amy M. Bohnert
Original Paper

Abstract

This study extends the over-scheduling hypothesis literature by focusing on affluent adolescents and exploring relations between psychosocial adjustment and reasons for organized activity (OA) involvement rather than focusing solely on time spent in OAs. Variable- and person-centered analyses were used to evaluate associations between intensity of OA participation and reasons for involvement, perceived parental pressure, and adjustment (depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, life satisfaction) in a sample of 10th graders (N = 122) from affluent communities. When adolescents’ perceptions of parental pressure were controlled for in analyses, more intensely involved youth reported lower levels of depressive symptoms. “For Fun” was the most highly rated reason for involvement and was linked to lower levels of perceived parental pressure, but was unrelated to all indicators of adjustment. Conversely, involvement in OAs “for Parents” was linked to more perceived parental pressure and lower levels of life satisfaction. Two OA participant profiles emerged in person-centered analyses: (1) primarily intrinsic reasons (high Fun, moderate Future, low Parents) and (2) intrinsic and extrinsic reasons (high Fun, high Future, high Parents) for involvement. OA participation simultaneously motivated by extrinsic and intrinsic reasons was linked to fewer psychosocial benefits than intrinsically motivated OA involvement.

Keywords

Affluence Adolescence Over-scheduling Organized activity involvement Adjustment 

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). The child behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, S. L., & Teicher, M. H. (2008). Stress, sensitive periods and maturation events in adolescent depression. Trends in Neurosciences, 31, 183–191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, G., & Hall, D. (1967). A clustering technique for summarizing multivariate data. Behavioral Science, 12, 153–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, T., & LaVelle, K. B. (2013). Comparing socioemotional outcomes for early adolescents who join after school for internal or external reasons. Journal of Early Adolescence, 33, 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohnert, A., Aikins, J., & Arola, N. (2013). Regrouping: Organized activity involvement and social adjustment across the transition to high school. New Directions in Child Development, 140, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohnert, A., Fredricks, J., & Randall, E. (2010). Capturing unique dimensions of youth’s organized activity involvement: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Review of Educational Research, 80, 576–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brustad, R. J. (1988). Affective outcomes in competitive youth sport: The influence of intrapersonal and socialization factors. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 307–321.Google Scholar
  8. Busseri, M. A., Rose-Krasnor, L., Willoughby, T., & Chalmers, H. (2006). A longitudinal examination of breadth and intensity of youth activity involvement and successful development. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1313–1326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success & failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Farb, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2012). Recent advances in research on school-based extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Developmental Review, 32, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fletcher, A. C., Nickerson, P., & Wright, K. L. (2003). Structured leisure activities in middle childhood: Links to well-being. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fredricks, J. A. (2012). Extracurricular participation and academic outcomes: Testing the over-scheduling hypothesis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 295–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fredricks, J. A., Alfeld-Liro, C. J., Hruda, L. Z., Eccles, J. S., Patrick, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2002). A qualitative exploration of adolescents’ commitment to athletics and the arts. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17, 68–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Is extracurricular participation associated with beneficial outcomes? Concurrent and longitudinal relations. Developmental Psychology, 42, 698–713.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hellstedt, J. C. (1990). Early adolescent perceptions of parental pressure in the sport environment. Journal of Sport Behavior, 13, 135–144.Google Scholar
  18. Kendall, P., Puliafico, A. C., Barmish, A. J., Choudhury, M. S., Henin, A., & Treadwell, K. S. (2007). Assessing anxiety with the child behavior checklist and the teacher report form. Anxiety Disorders, 21, 1004–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knifsend, C. A., & Graham, S. (2012). Too much of a good thing? How breadth of extracurricular participation relates to school-related affect and academic outcomes during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 379–389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Linver, M. R., Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2009). Patterns of adolescents’ participation in organized activities: Are sports best when combined with other activities? Developmental Psychology, 45, 354–367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luthar, S. S. (2003). The culture of affluence: Psychological costs of material wealth. Child Development, 74, 1581–1593.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Luthar, S. S., & Barkin, S. H. (2012). Are affluent youth truly “at risk”? Vulnerability and resilience across three diverse samples. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 429–449.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Luthar, S. S., & Goldstein, A. S. (2008). Substance use and related behaviors among suburban late adolescents: The importance of perceived parent containment. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 591–614.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Luthar, S. S., & Latendresse, S. J. (2005a). Children of the affluent: Challenges to well-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 49–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Luthar, S. S., & Latendresse, S. J. (2005b). Comparable “risks” at the socioeconomic status extremes: Preadolescents’ perceptions of parenting. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 207–230.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Luthar, S. S., Shoum, K. A., & Brown, P. J. (2006). Extracurricular involvement among affluent youth: A scapegoat for “ubiquitous achievement pressures”? Developmental Psychology, 42, 583–597.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2002). Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 37–44.Google Scholar
  29. Mahoney, J. L. (2000). School extracurricular activity participation as a moderator in the development of antisocial patterns. Child Development, 71, 502–516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahoney, J. L., Cairns, B. D., & Farmer, T. W. (2003). Promoting interpersonal competence and educational success through extracurricular activity participation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahoney, J. L., Harris, A. L., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Organized activity participation, positive youth development, and the over-scheduling hypothesis (Social policy report no. 4). Ann Arbor: Society for Research in Child Development.Google Scholar
  32. Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Lord, H. (2005). Organized activities as developmental contexts for children and adolescents. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 3–22). Mahwah: Lawrence Erbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Mahoney, J. L., Vandell, D. L., Simpkins, S., & Zarrett, N. (2009). Adolescent out-of-school activities. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 228–269). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Mahoney, J. L., & Vest, A. E. (2012). The over-scheduling hypothesis revisited: Intensity of organized activity participation during adolescence and young adult outcomes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 409–418.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Metzger, A., Crean, H. F., & Forbes-Jones, E. L. (2009). Patterns of organized activity participation in urban, early adolescents: Associations with academic achievement, problem behaviors, and perceived adult support. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 426–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  38. Peugh, J., & Fan, X. (2013). Modeling unobserved heterogeneity using latent profile analysis: A monte carlo simulation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(4), 616–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Posner, J. K., & Vandell, D. L. (1999). After-school activities and the development of low-income urban children: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 35, 868–879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Randall, E., & Bohnert, A. (2009). Organized activity involvement, depressive symptoms, and social adjustment in adolescents: Ethnicity and socioeconomic status as moderators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1187–1198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Randall, E., & Bohnert, A. (2012). Understanding threshold effects of organized activity involvement in adolescents: Sex and family income as moderators. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 107–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Randall, E., Bohnert, A., & Travers, L. (2015). Understanding affluent adolescent adjustment: The interplay of parental perfectionism, perceived parental pressure, and organized activity involvement. Journal of Adolescence, 41, 56–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rose-Krasnor, L., Busseri, M. A., Willoughby, T., & Chalmers, H. (2006). Breadth and intensity of youth activity involvement as contexts for positive development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rosenfeld, A., & Wise, N. (2000). The over-scheduled child: Avoiding the hyper-parenting trap. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar
  45. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Scanlan, T. K., Stein, G. L., & Ravizza, K. (1991). An in-depth study of former elite figure skaters: III. Sources of stress. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13, 103–120.Google Scholar
  47. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scriven, A., & Smith-Ferrier, S. (2003). The application of online surveys for workplace health research. Journal of the Royal Society of Health, 123, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sharp, E. H., Caldwell, L. L., Graham, J. W., & Ridenour, T. A. (2006). Individual motivation and parental influence on adolescents’ experiences of interest in free time: A longitudinal examination. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sharp, E. H., Tucker, C. J., Baril, M. E., Van Gundy, K. T., & Rebellon, C. J. (2014). Breadth of participation in organized and unstructured leisure activities over time and rural adolescents’ functioning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 62–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Sills, S. J., & Song, C. (2002). Innovations in survey research an application of web-based surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stanton, J. M., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2001). Using internet/intranet web pages to collect organizational research data. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 200–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stoeber, J., Otto, K., & Stoll, O. (2005). Perfectionistic aspirations in athletes: Except for the negative reactions, they’re positive! In Paper presented at the meeting of the Stress and Anxiety Research Society, Halle/Saale, Germany.Google Scholar
  54. Strauss, R. S., & Pollack, H. A. (2003). Social marginalization of overweight children. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 157, 746–752.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Suzuki, L. A., Ponterotto, J. G., & Meller, P. J. (2008). Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  57. US Census Bureau. (2008). Quick facts. Retrieved December 1, 2009, from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html
  58. Viau, A., & Poulin, F. (2014). Youths’ organized activities and adjustment in emerging adulthood: A multidimensional conception of participation. Journal on Adolescence, 25, 1–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edin T. Randall
    • 1
  • Lea V. Travers
    • 2
  • Jenna B. Shapiro
    • 3
  • Amy M. Bohnert
    • 3
  1. 1.The Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation CenterBoston Children’s Hospital – WalthamWalthamUSA
  2. 2.Massachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.Loyola University ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations