Enhancing Children’s Social Emotional Functioning Through Virtual Game-Based Delivery of Social Skills Training
- 1.8k Downloads
Social skills training (SST) programs can be an effective means of improving children’s social skills and behavior. However, significant time, financial, and opportunity barriers limit the number of children who can benefit from in-person SST programs. In this study, we conducted an initial evaluation of the efficacy of Zoo U, an interactive online game for elementary-age children that translates evidence-based social emotional learning strategies into tailored social problem-solving scenes in a virtual world. Children were randomly assigned to either treatment (n = 23) or wait-list control (n = 24) and were compared on parent-report of their social and behavioral adjustment, as well as self-report of social self-efficacy, social satisfaction, and social skill literacy. Following participation in the Zoo U game-based SST program, the treatment group showed enhanced social skills in the areas of impulse control, emotion regulation, and social initiation, as well as more adaptive social behavior compared to the control group. Children in the treatment group also reported significant improvements in their feelings of social self-efficacy and social satisfaction, as well as higher social literacy at post-intervention compared to children in the control condition. This study provides preliminary evidence that a game-based approach to SST can be an effective method for improving children’s social skills and enhancing social knowledge, functioning, and self-confidence. Discussion focuses on the need for further investigation to establish the role that game-based SST can play in supporting children’s social growth and wellbeing.
KeywordsSocial skills training Game-based learning Social-emotional learning
This research was supported by a grant from the United States Department of Education, Institute of Education Science (Grant #ED-IES-11-C-0039) to 3C Institute.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Conflicts of interest exist. The game-based social skills training program, Zoo U, was developed and by 3C Institute. The Zoo U software is commercially available. Melissa DeRosier is the CEO of 3C Institute and has intellectual property rights for Zoo U.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent/assent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.
- Beal, C. R., Arroyo, I. M., Cohen, P. R., & Woolf, B. P. (2010). Evaluation of Animal Watch: An intelligent tutoring system for arithmetic and fractions. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9, 64–77.Google Scholar
- Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Prosocial behavior and aggression in childhood and pre-adolesence. In A. C. Bohart & D. J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive and destructive behavior: Implications for family, school, and society (pp. 187–203). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DeRosier, M. E. (2011). Using computer-based social tasks to assess students’ social skills: Findings from the Zoo U pilot evaluation. Zoo U: Final report to Institute for Educational Sciences (IES) at the U.S. Department of Education. Cary, NC: 3CInstitute.Google Scholar
- DeRosier, M. E. (Ed.). (2014). Social skills assessment through games: The new best practice. Cary, NC: Interchange Press.Google Scholar
- Eber, L. (2006). Illinois PBIS evaluation report. LaGrange Park: Illinois State Board of Education, PBIS/EBD Network.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., Spinrad, T. L., Cumberland, A., Liew, J., Reiser, M., et al. (2009). Longitudinal relations of children’s effortful control, impulsivity, and negative emotionality to their externalizing, internalizing, and co-occurring behavior problems. Developmental Psychology, 45, 988. doi: 10.1037/a0016213.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fabes, R. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Fitzgerald, G. E. (2005). Using technologies to meet the unique needs of students with emotional/behavioral disorders: Findings and directions. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 335–354). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design Inc.Google Scholar
- Foster, S. L., & Bussman, J. R. (2007). Evidence-based approaches to social skills training with children and adolescents. In R. G. Steele, T. D. Elkin, & M. C. Roberts (Eds.), Handbook of evidence-based therapies for children and adolescents: Bridging science and practice (pp. 409–428). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Graesser, A. C., Conley, M., & Olney, A. (2011). Intelligent tutoring systems. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 3, pp. 451–473)., Applications to learning and teaching Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Gresham, F. M. (2004). Current status and future directions of school-based behavioral interventions. School Psychology Review, 33, 326–343.Google Scholar
- Haslam, M. B., White, R. N., & Klinge, A. (2006, May). Improving student literacy: READ 180 in the Austin Independent School District 2004–05. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.Google Scholar
- Hemmeter, M. L., Ostrosky, M., & Fox, L. (2006). Social and emotional foundations for early learning: A conceptual model for intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 583–601.Google Scholar
- Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Hoglund, W. L. G., & Aber, J. L. (2010). A school-randomized clinical trial of an integrated social-emotional learning and literacy intervention: Impacts after 1 school year. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 829–842. doi: 10.1037/a0021383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leff, S. S., Power, T. J., Mantz, P. H., Costigan, T. E., & Nabors, L. A. (2001). School-based aggression prevention program for young children. School Psychology Review, 30, 344–363.Google Scholar
- Mathews, T. L., Erkfritz-Gay, K. N., Knight, J., Lancaster, B. M., & Kupzyk, K. A. (2013). The effects of social skills training on children with autism spectrum disorders and disruptive behavior disorders. Children’s Health Care, 42, 311–332. doi: 10.1080/02739615.2013.842458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mihalic, S. (2004). The importance of implementation fidelity. Emotional & Behavioral Disorders in Youth, 4, 83–105.Google Scholar
- Moreira, P., Crusellas, L., Sá, I., Gomes, P., & Matias, C. (2010). Evaluation of a manual-based programme for the promotion of social and emotional skills in elementary school children: Results from a 4-year study in Portugal. Health promotion international, 25, 309–317. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- NCREL & Metiri Group. (2003). enGauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age. Naperville, IL: NCREL & Metiri Group.Google Scholar
- O'Connor, M. J., Frankel, F., Paley, B., Schonfeld, A. M., Carpenter, E., Laugeson, E. A., & Marquardt, R. (2006). A controlled social skills training for children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 639–648. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.639.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perotta, C., Featherstone, G., Aston, H., & Houghton, E. (2013). Game-based learning: Latest evidence and future directions. Slough: NFER.Google Scholar
- Psotka, J., & Mutter, S. A. (1988). Intelligent tutoring systems: Lessons learned. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). Behavior assessment scale for children. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
- Shute, V. J., Levy, R., Baker, R., Zapata, D., & Beck, J. (2009). Assessment and learning in intelligent educational systems: A peek into the future. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and Education (AIED’09) Workshop on Intelligent Educational Games (pp. 99–109).Google Scholar
- Snyder, H. (2001). Child delinquents. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Risk factors and successful interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Tremblay, R. E., Masse, L. C., Pagani, L., & Vitaro, F. (1996). From childhood physical aggression to adolescent maladjustment: The Montreal prevention experiment. In R. D. Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse and delinquency. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology, Washington, D.C., 2010.Google Scholar