Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 647–660 | Cite as

A Multilevel Analysis of Adverse Family Relations, School Bonding and Risk Behaviours Among Adolescents

  • Darko Rovis
  • Harrie Jonkman
  • Josipa Basic
Original Paper
  • 449 Downloads

Abstract

The risk behaviours of adolescents, such as alcohol use, gambling and violence, represent a great public health challenge. In order to investigate how inter-school differences in risk behaviours can be explained by a positive school environment, measured via school bonding at the individual and school level, and how risk behaviour differences relate to a negative family environment, a multilevel analysis of individual, family and school factors was conducted. A survey was carried out with a random sample of 20 % of all students from 30 secondary schools in Croatia. The questionnaire used consisted of scales for assessing (1) risk behaviours, (2) socio-demographics, (3) adverse family relations, (4) school bonding and (5) school level variables. Intraclass correlations of 0.094 and 0.101 for risk behaviours and school bonding, respectively, were found. Upon fitting a multilevel model with individual and contextual variables, 94.3 % of the school level variance for risk behaviours was explained. Results indicate that, when the compositional effects of age, gender, family background and student’s own level of school attachment and commitment were held constant, attending a school where students tended to exhibit better school bonding was associated with fewer reported risk behaviours both for students from high and low levels of adverse family relationships. These findings support the notion that a whole school approach targeted towards students, families and schools may be helpful in the prevention of risk behaviours.

Keywords

School context School bonding Adverse family relations Risk behaviours Multilevel analysis 

References

  1. Adlaf, E., & Turner, N. (2004). Schools, students and adolescent gambling in Ontario: Two studies. Ontario, Canada: Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
  2. Ajduković, M., & Kolesarić, V. (Eds.). (2003). Etički kodeks istraživanja s djecom [The code of ethics for research with children]. Zagreb, Croatia: Državni Zavod za Zaštitu Obitelji, Materinstva i Mladeži.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Pollard, J. A., Catalano, R. F., & Baglioni, A. J. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The communities that care youth survey. Evaluation Review, 26, 575–601. doi: 10.1177/0193841x0202600601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, J. A., Hill, K. G., Meacham, M. C., Young, S. E., & Hawkins, D. J. (2011). Strategies for characterizing complex phenotypes and environments: General and specific family environmental predictors of young adult tobacco dependence, alcohol use disorder, and co-occurring problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 118, 444–451. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.05.002.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bašić, J. (2009). Teorije prevencije: Prevencija poremećaja u ponašanju i rizičnih ponašanja djece i mladih [Theories of prevention: Prevention of risk behaviours and behaviour disorders among children and youth]. Zagreb, Croatia: Školska Knjiga.Google Scholar
  6. Bašić, J., & Ferić, M. (2000). Rizici u komunikaciji obitelji adolescenata [Risks in the communication in the family with adolescents]. In B. Juras (Ed.), Položaj adolescenta u obitelji [Position of adolescents in the family] (pp. 81–97). Zagreb, Croatia: Državni Zavod za Zaštitu Obitelji, Materinstva i Mladeži.Google Scholar
  7. Beyers, J. M., Toumbourou, J. W., Catalano, R. F., Arthur, M. W., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). A cross-national comparison of risk and protective factors for adolescent substance use: The United States and Australia. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 3–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.08.015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bezinović, P., & Malatestinić, Đ. (2009). Perceived exposure to substance use and risk-taking behavior in early adolescence: Cross-sectional study. Croatian Medical Journal, 50, 157–164. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2009.50.157.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bezinović, P., Marušić, I., & Ristić Dedić, Z. (2010). Razvoj kratke ljestvice učeničkih iskustava s učenjem i nastavom [Development of the short scale of student expiriences with learning and teaching]. Odgojne Znanosti, 12, 29–44.Google Scholar
  10. Bezinović, P., & Smojver-Ažić, S. (2000). Negativni odnos roditelja i agresivnost adolescenata: Značenje spola roditelja i spola djeteta [Adverse parental relationship and adolescent aggressiveness: The importance of parent’s gender and the child’s gender]. Hrvatska Revija za Rehabilitacijska Istraživanja, 36(1), 87–98.Google Scholar
  11. Bezinović, P., & Tkalčić, M. (2002). Škola i psihosomatski simptomi kod srednjoškolaca [School and psychosomatic symptoms in secondary school students]. Napredak, 143, 279–290.Google Scholar
  12. Bonell, C., Parry, W., Wells, H., Jamal, F., Fletcher, A., Harden, A., et al. (2013). The effects of the school environment on student health: A systematic review of multi-level studies. Health and Place, 21, 180–191. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.12.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brody, G. H., Dorsey, S., Forehand, R., & Armistead, L. (2002). Unique and protective contributions of parenting and classroom processes to the adjustment of African American children living in single-parent families. Child Development, 73, 274–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brook, J. S., Brook, D. W., Gordon, A. S., Whiteman, M., & Cohen, P. (1990). The psychosocial etiology of adolescent drug use: A family interactional approach. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 116, 111–267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, D. J. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ciairano, S. (2005). The direct and indirect effects of individual and environmental resources in moderating the risk during adolescence. Marie Curie Fellowships Annals, 4. Google Scholar
  17. Cunningham, N. J. (2007). Level of bonding to school and perception of the school environment by bullies, victims, and bully victims. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 457–478. doi: 10.1177/0272431607302940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dahlberg, L. L. (1998). Youth violence in the United States: Major trends, risk factors, and prevention approaches. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14, 259–272. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00009-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dodig, D., & Ricijaš, N. (2011). Obilježja kockanja Zagrebačkih adolescenata [Gambling of adolescents in Zagreb]. Ljetopis Socijalnog Rada, 18, 103–125.Google Scholar
  20. Donovan, J. E., Jessor, R., & Costa, F. M. (1991). Adolescent health behavior and conventionality–unconventionality: An extension of problem–behavior therapy. Health Psychology, 10, 52–61. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.10.1.52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duhig, A. M., Maciejewski, P. K., Desai, R. A., Krishnan-Sarin, S., & Potenza, M. N. (2007). Characteristics of adolescent past-year gamblers and non-gamblers in relation to alcohol drinking. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.021.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Iver, D. M. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ennett, S. T., & Haws, S. (2010). The school context of adolescent substance use. In L. M. Scheier (Ed.), Handbook of drug use etiology: Theory, methods, and empirical findings (pp. 443–459). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  24. Epstein, M., Hill, K. G., Bailey, J. A., & Hawkins, D. J. (2013). The effect of general and drug-specific family environments on comorbid and drug-specific problem behavior: A longitudinal examination. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1151–1164. doi: 10.1037/a0029309.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fagan, A. A., Van Horn, M. L., Hawkins, D. J., & Arthur, M. W. (2007). Gender similarities and differences in the association between risk and protective factors and self-reported serious delinquency. Prevention Science, 8, 115–124. doi: 10.1007/s11121-006-0062-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, J. L. (2003). Resilience to childhood adversity: Results of a 21-year study. In S. S. Luthar (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 130–155). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hawkins, D. J. (1999). Preventing crime and violence through communities that care. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 7, 443–458. doi: 10.1023/a:1008769321118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hawkins, D. J., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hawkins, D. J., Guo, J., Hill, K. G., Battin-Pearson, S., & Abbott, R. D. (2001). Long-term effects of the Seattle Social Development Intervention on school bonding trajectories. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 225–236. doi: 10.1207/S1532480XADS0504_04.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hemphill, S. A., Heerde, J. A., Herrenkohl, T. I., Patton, G. C., Toumbourou, J. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2011). Risk and protective factors for adolescent substance use in Washington State, the United States and Victoria, Australia: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49, 312–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.017.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henry, K. L., & Slater, M. D. (2007). The contextual effect of school attachment on young adolescents’ alcohol use. Journal of School Health, 77, 67–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00169.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henry, K. L., Stanley, L. R., Edwards, R. W., Harkabus, L. C., & Chapin, L. A. (2009). Individual and contextual effects of school adjustment on adolescent alcohol use. Prevention Science, 10, 236–247. doi: 10.1007/s11121-009-0124-2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  34. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Jonkman, H., Steketee, M., Tombourou, J. W., Cini, K., & Williams, J. (2014). Community variation in adolescent alcohol use in Australia and the Netherlands. Health Promotion International, 29, 109–117. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das039.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kellam, S. G., & Van Horn, Y. V. (1997). Life course development, community epidemiology, and preventive trials: A scientific structure for prevention research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 177–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kreft, I. G., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Newbury Park: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuzman, M., Pavić Šimetin, I., & Pejnović Franelić, I. (2012a). Ponašanje u vezi sa zdravljem u djece školske dobi 2009/2010: Djeca i mladi u društvenom okruženju [The health behaviour in school-aged children 2009/2010: Children and youth in social environment]. Zagreb, Croatia: Hrvatski Zavod za Javno Zdravstvo.Google Scholar
  39. Kuzman, M., Pavić Šimetin, I., Pejnović Franelić, I., Markelić, M., & Hemen, M. (2012b). ESPAD the European school survey project on alcohol and other drugs 2011. Zagreb, Croatia: Hrvatski Zavod za Javno Zdravstvo.Google Scholar
  40. Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35, 125–141. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3502_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1996). Collective responsibility for learning and its effects on gains in achievement for early secondary school students. American Journal of Education, 104, 103–147. doi: 10.1086/444122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lonczak, H. S., Huang, B., Catalano, R. F., Hawkins, J. D., Hill, K. G., Abbott, R. D., & Kosterman, R. (2001). The social predictors of adolescent alcohol misuse: A test of the social development model. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 179–189.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Loxley, W., Toumbourou, J. W., Tim, S., Ben, H., Scott, K., Godfrey, C., & Williams, J. (2004). The prevention of substance use, risk and harm in Australia: A review of the evidence. Canberra, Australia: The National Drug Research Institute and the Centre for Adolescent Health.Google Scholar
  44. Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maddox, S. J., & Prinz, R. J. (2003). School bonding in children and adolescents: Conceptualization, assessment, and associated variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6, 31–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Markham, W. A., Young, R., Sweeting, H., West, P., & Aveyard, P. (2012). Does school ethos explain the relationship between value-added education and teenage substance use? A cohort study. Social Science and Medicine, 75, 69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.045.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marta, E. (1997). Parent–adolescent interactions and psychosocial risk in adolescents: An analysis of communication, support and gender. Journal of Adolescence, 20, 473–487. doi: 10.1006/jado.1997.0103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mayberry, M. L., Espelage, D. L., & Koenig, B. (2009). Multilevel modeling of direct effects and interactions of peers, parents, school, and community influences on adolescent substance use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1038–1049. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9425-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McKinney, C., & Renk, K. (2011). A multivariate model of parent–adolescent relationship variables in early adolescence. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 42, 442–462. doi: 10.1007/s10578-011-0228-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Keefe, M., & Lebovics, S. (2005). Adolescents from maritally violent homes. Prevention Researcher, 12, 3–7.Google Scholar
  51. Osgood, D. W., & Anderson, A. L. (2004). Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology, 42, 519–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00528.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pavic Simetin, I., Kern, J., Kuzman, M., & Pfortner, T. K. (2013). Inequalities in Croatian pupils’ risk behaviors associated to socioeconomic environment at school and area level: A multilevel approach. Social Science and Medicine, 98, 154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.021.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  54. Rose-Krasnor, L., Busseri, M. A., Willoughby, T., & Chalmers, H. (2006). Breadth and intensity of youth activity involvement as contexts for positive development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 365–379. doi: 10.1007/s10964-006-9037-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roviš, D., & Bezinović, P. (2011). Vezanost za školu—analiza privrženosti školi i predanosti školskim obvezama kod srednjoškolaca [School bonding—an analysis of attachment to school and commitment to schooling in high school students]. Sociologija i Prostor, 190, 185–208. doi: 10.5673/sip.49.2.4.Google Scholar
  56. Šakić, V., Franc, R., & Mlačić, B. (2002). Samoiskazana sklonost adolescenata socijalnim devijacijama i antisocijalnim ponašanjima [Self-expressed tendency of adolescents towards social deviations and antisocial behaviour]. Društvena Istraživanja, 11, 265–289.Google Scholar
  57. Schaps, E., & Solomon, D. (2003). The role of the school’s social environment in preventing student drug use. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 23, 299–328. doi: 10.1023/a:1021393724832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sheryl, A. H., Stephanie, M. P., Herrenkohl, T. I., Toumbourou, J. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2014). Student and school factors associated with school suspension: A multilevel analysis of students in Victoria, Australia and Washington State, United States. Children and Youth Services Review, 36, 187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.11.022.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Siddiqui, O., Hedeker, D., Flay, B. R., & Hu, F. B. (1996). Intraclass correlation estimates in a school-based smoking prevention study. Outcome and mediating variables, by sex and ethnicity. American Journal of Epidemiology, 144, 425–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, J., Berthelsen, D., & O’Connor, I. (1997). Child adjustment in high conflict families. Child: Care, Health and Development, 23, 113–133.Google Scholar
  61. Smojver-Ažić, S., & Bezinović, P. (2011). Sex differences in patterns of relations between family interactions and depressive symptoms in adolescents. Croatian Medical Journal, 52, 469–477. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.469.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Steketee, M., Jonkman, H., Berten, H., & Vettenburg, N. (2013). Alcohol use among adolescents in Europe: Environmental research and preventive actions. Utrecht, Netherland: Verwey-Jonker Institute.Google Scholar
  63. Swaim, R. C. (2003). Individual and school level effects of perceived harm, perceived availability, and community size on marijuana use among 12th-grade students: A random effects model. Prevention Science, 4, 89–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tulchinsky, T. H., & Varavikova, E. A. (2009). The new public health. Oxford, England: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  65. Wenzel, V., Weichold, K., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2009). The life skills program IPSY: Positive influences on school bonding and prevention of substance misuse. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 1391–1401. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.05.008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teaching Institute for Public Health of Primorsko-Goranska CountyRijekaCroatia
  2. 2.Verwey-Jonker InstituteUtrechtNetherlands
  3. 3.Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation SciencesUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations