Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 136–145 | Cite as

Helicopter Parenting in Emerging Adulthood: Support or Barrier for Korean College Students’ Psychological Adjustment?

  • Kyong-Ah Kwon
  • Gyesook YooEmail author
  • Gary E. Bingham
Original Paper

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to revisit and validate the current conceptualization of helicopter parenting with Korean college students by using the Helicopter Parenting Scale. Using an individuation–separation process framework from family systems theory, we also examined associations between college student’s retrospective self-report of their parents’ helicopter parenting and their own psychological adjustment. Four hundred twelve students from 13 private universities in Korea completed a questionnaire about their parent’s parenting and their own psychological adjustment measured in locus of control and emotional well-being. The finding of an one-factor solution does not support our hypothesis that there may be a difference in the conceptualization of helicopter parenting between Korea and the U.S. samples. Findings indicate perceived helicopter parenting was negatively associated with college students’ internal locus of control. Although there was no direct link from helicopter parenting to Korean college students’ emotional well-being, the association of helicopter parenting to emotional well-being was indirect through its link to students’ locus of control.

Keywords

Helicopter parenting Parent involvement College students Korean students Psychological adjustment Locus of control Emotional well-being 

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
  2. Ballash, N. G., Pemble, M. K., Usui, W. M., Buckley, A. F., & Woodruff-Borden, J. (2006). Family functioning, perceived control, and anxiety: A mediational model. Anxiety Disorders, 20, 486–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowen, M. (1976). Theory in the practice of psychotherapy. In P. J. Guerin (Ed.), Family therapy: Theory and practice (pp. 42–90). New York: Gardner.Google Scholar
  4. Bradley-Geist, J. C., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2014). Helicopter parents: An examination of the correlates of over-parenting of college students. Education and Training, 56, 314–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Center for Postsecondary Research School of Education. (2007). National survey of student engagement: Annual report. Bloomington, IN: Indian University.Google Scholar
  6. Cha, J., Kong, J., & Kim, C. (1973). The Korean Internal-External Control Scale. Research Note, 2, 263–271. Seoul: Korean Institute for Research in the Behavioral SciencesGoogle Scholar
  7. Chao, R., & Tseng, V. (2002). Parenting of Asians. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 4, pp. 59–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, K. (2002). Psychological separation–individuation and adjustment to college among Korean American students: The roles of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 468–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dmitrieva, J., Chen, C., & Greenberger, E. (2008). Whither the “Whiz Kids” went: Asian American students’ transition to college. In G. Li & L. Wang (Eds.), Model minority myths revisited: An interdisciplinary approach to demystifying Asian American education experiences. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  10. Fingerman, K. L., Cheng, Y. P., Wesselmann, E. D., Zarit, S., Furstenberg, F., & Birditt, K. S. (2012). Helicopter parents and landing pad kids: Intense parental support of grown children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 880–896. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00987.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Gavazzi, S., & Sabatelli, R. M. (1990). Family system dynamics, the individuation process, and psychosocial development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 500–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Givertz, M., & Segrin, C. (2014). The association between overinvolved parenting and young adults’ self-efficacy, psychological entitlement, and family communication. Community Research, 41, 1111–1136. doi: 10.1177/0093650212456392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grotevan, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1998). Individuality and connectedness in adolescent development: Review and prospects for research on identity, relationships, and context. In E. Skoe & A. Von der Lippe (Eds.), Personality development in adolescence: A cross national and life span perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, U., & Choi, S. H. (1994). Individualism, collectivism, and child development: A Korean perspective. In P. M. Greenfield & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Cross-cultural roots of minority child development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  17. LeMoyne, T., & Buchanan, T. (2011). Does “hovering” matter? Helicopter parenting and its effect on well-being. Sociological Spectrum, 31, 399–418. doi: 10.1080/02732173.2011.574038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mattanah, J. F., Hancock, G. R., & Brand, B. L. (2004). Parental attachment, separation–individuation, and college student adjustment: A structural equation analysis of meditational effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McElhaney, K. B., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Sociocultural perspectives on adolescent autonomy. In P. Kerig, M. Shulz, & S. T. Hauser (Eds.), Adolescence and beyond (pp. 161–176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology. (2012). 2012 advancement rate of high school graduates. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.Google Scholar
  21. Odenweller, K. G., Booth-Butterfield, M., & Weber, K. (2014). Investing helicopter parenting, family environments, and relational outcomes for Millennials. Communication Studies, 65, 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Nelson, L. J. (2012). Black hawk down? Establishing helicopter parenting as a distinct construct from other forms of parental control during emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1177–1190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Park, S. J. (2006). The retreat from formal schooling: “Educational manager mothers” in the private after-school market of South Korea. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  24. Park, H., Byun, S., & Kim, K. (2011). Parental involvement and students’ cognitive outcomes in Korea: Private tutoring. Sociology of Education, 84, 3–22. doi: 10.1177/0038040710392719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rice, K. G., Cole, D. A., & Lapsley, D. K. (1990). Separation–individuation, family cohesion, and adjustment to college: Measurement validation and test of a theoretical model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (Whole No. 609).Google Scholar
  27. Rotter, J. B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of the variable. The American Psychologist, 45, 489–493. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schiffrin, H. H., Godfrey, H., Liss, M., & Erchull, M. J. (2014a). Intensive parenting: Does it have the desired impact on child outcomes? Journal of Child and Family Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10826-014-0035-0.Google Scholar
  29. Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., Geary, K. A., Erchull, M. J., & Tashner, T. (2014b). Helping or hovering? The effects of helicopter parenting on college students’ well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 548–557. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9716-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., Bauer, A., & Murphy, M. T. (2012). The association between overparenting, parent–child communication, and entitlement and adaptive traits in adult children. Family Relations, 61, 237–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00689.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., & Montgomery, N. (2013). Parent and child traits associated with overparenting. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32(569–595), 2013. doi: 10.1521/jscp.32.6.569.Google Scholar
  32. Shweder, R., & Sullivan, M. (1993). Cultural psychology: Who needs it? Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 497–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sohn, S. (2009). Socialization of adolescent children in Korean families: Parental expectations and involvement. Studies on Korean Youth, 20(1), 57–84.Google Scholar
  34. Somers, P., & Settle, J. (2010). The helicopter parent: Research toward a typology. College and University, 86, 18–24.Google Scholar
  35. Spokas, M., & Heimberg, R. G. (2009). Overprotective parenting, social anxiety, and external locus of control: Cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33, 543–551. doi: 10.1007/s10608-008-9227-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Suh, E., & Koo, J. (2011). A Concise Measure of Subjective Well-Being (COMOSWB): Scale development and validation. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 25, 95–113.Google Scholar
  37. Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Wang, S., Koutsouvanou, E., & Albright, M. (2002). Childrearing values in Greece, Taiwan, and the United States. Parenting: Science and Practice, 2, 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tang, N. M. (1992). Some psychoanalytic implications of Chinese philosophy and child-rearing practices. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 47, 371–389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. The Wall Street Journal (2007, Sept 27). Helicopter parenting: A breakdown. The Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB119084349844440465
  40. Time Magazine (2009, Nov 30). The growing backlash against overparenting. Time Magazine. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1940697,00.html
  41. Umberson, D. (1992). Relationships between adult children and their parents: Psychological consequences for both generations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 664–674. doi: 10.2307/353252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ungar, M. (2009). Overprotective parenting: Helping parents provide children the right amount of risk and responsibility. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 37, 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang, Q., Pomerantz, E. M., & Chen, H. (2007). The role of parents’ control in early adolescents’ psychological functioning: A longitudinal investigation in the United States and China. Child Development, 78, 1592–1610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Early Childhood EducationGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Child and Family StudiesKyung Hee UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations