Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp 2975–2988 | Cite as

Predictors of Development of Vulnerable Children Receiving Child Welfare Services

  • Claire ChamberlandEmail author
  • Carl Lacharité
  • Marie-Ève Clément
  • Danielle Lessard
Original Paper

Abstract

This study aims to identify the risk and protective factors most associated with cognitive/language and socio-emotional development of vulnerable children receiving preventive or protective services. 185 children at Time 1 and 161 children at Time 2 (post-test) were recruited from child preventive and child protective services. Child functioning, family and community environment, and parent–child relationship were evaluated. Bivariate then multivariate analyses were performed based on the results obtained in the initial analyses; a set of multiple regressions formed the basis of path analyses for each of the dependent variables. Data from the second measurement time were used mainly for sample replication. Parental stress and child abuse potential were negatively related to the children’s socio-emotional development. Parental stress was also negatively related to cognitive/language development. The quality of the home environment was positively associated with the children’s cognitive/language and socio-emotional development. Socio-economic risk and social support were not directly associated with outcomes. However, socio-economic risk was inversely related to the quality of the home environment, whereas social support seemed to act as a moderator of child abuse potential and the quality of the home environment. These trends were mostly confirmed at Time 2. The decrease in parental risk factors between Times 1 and 2 was associated with an improvement in socio-emotional development, whereas improvement in the quality of the home environment was associated with better performance in cognitive/language tests. Results suggest the importance of taking action at several systemic levels to improve the development of vulnerable children.

Keywords

Child development outcome Protective factors Risk factor High risk children Child Maltreatment 

References

  1. Abidin, R. R. (1983). Parenting stress index. Charlottesville, VA: Pediatric Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abidin, R. R. (2012). Parenting stress index (4th ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  3. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
  4. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
  5. Aldgate, J., Jones, D., Rose, W., & Jeffery, C. (2006). The developing world of the child. London, United Kingdom: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  6. Appleyard, K., Egeland, B., Van Dulmen, M. H. M., & Sroufe, L. A. (2005). When more is not better: The role of cumulative risk in child behavior outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 46(3), 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barth, R. P., Green, R., Webb, M. B., Wall, A., Gibbons, C., & Craig, C. (2008). Characteristics of out-of-home caregiving environments provided under child welfare services. Child Welfare, 87(3), 5–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bigras, M., Lafreniere, P. J., & Abidin, R. R. (1996). Indice de stress parental: Manuel francophone en complément à l’édition américaine. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  9. Bradley, R. H., Corwyn, R. F., McAdoo, H. P., & García Coll, C. (2001). The home environments of children in the United States Part I: Variations by age, ethnicity, and poverty status. Child Development, 72(6), 1844–1867.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1976). The experimental ecology of education. Teachers College Record, 78(2), 157–204.Google Scholar
  11. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Recent advances in the ecology of human development. In R. K. Silbereisen, K. Eyferth, & G. Rudinger (Eds.), Development as action in context: Problem behavior and normal youth development. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1996). Le modèle “processus- personne- contexte- temps” dans la recherche en psychologie du développement: Principes, applications et implications. In R. Tessier & G. M. Tarabulsy (Eds.), Le modèle écologique dans l’étude du développement de l’enfant (pp. 9–59). Sainte-Foy, Canada: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  13. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2001). The bioecological theory of human development. In N. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 6963–6970). New York, NY: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Caldwell, B. M., & Bradley, R. H. (1984). HOME observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas at Little Rock.Google Scholar
  16. Caldwell, B. M., & Bradley, R. H. (2003). HOME observation for measurement of the environment: Administration manual. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas.Google Scholar
  17. Campbell, K. A., Cook, L. J., LaFleur, B. J., & Keenan, H. T. (2010). Household, family, and child risk factors after an investigation for suspected child maltreatment: A missed opportunity for prevention. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 164(10), 943–949. doi: 10.1080/15374418209533076.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Campbell, K. A., Thomas, A. M., Cook, L. J., & Keenan, H. T. (2012). Longitudinal experiences of children remaining at home after a first-time investigation for suspected maltreatment. Journal of Pediatrics, 161(2), 340–347. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.02.039.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Carter, V., & Myers, M. R. (2007). Exploring the risks of substantiated physical neglect related to poverty and parental characteristics: A national sample. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(1), 110–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Casanueva, C. E., Cross, T. P., & Ringeisen, H. (2008). Developmental needs and individualized family service plans among infants and toddlers in the child welfare system. Child Maltreatment, 13(3), 245–258. doi: 10.1177/1077559508318397.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chamberlain, P., Price, J. M., Reid, J. B., Landsverk, J., Fisher, P. A., & Stoolmiller, M. (2006). Who disrupts from placement in foster and kinship care? Child Abuse and Neglect, 30(4), 409–424. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.11.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chamberland, C., Lacharité, C., Bouchard, V., & Lessard, D. (2010, September). Characteristics of children and families receiving preventive and protective services. Paper presented at the XVIII ISPCAN International Congress on Child Abuse and Neglect, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  23. Chamberland, C., Lacharité, C., Lessard, D., Lemay, L., Dufour, S., Clément, M.-È., … & Plourde, S. (2013). Framework for the Assessment of Children in Needs and their Families: Adaptation, Implementation and Evaluation in Québec. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  24. Chamberland, C., Lessard, D., Lacharité, C., Dufour, S., Lemay, L., Clément, M.-E., … & Paré, C. (2012). Recherche évaluative de l’initiatives AIDES: Rapport final présenté à la Stratégie nationale de prévention du crime du gouvernement du Canada (SNCP), en collaboration avec le ministère de la Sécurité publique du Québec (pp. 331). Montréal, Canada: Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  25. Chazan-Cohen, R., Raikes, H., Brooks-Gunn, J., Ayoub, C., Pan, B. A., Kisker, E. E., … & Fuligni, A. S. (2009). Low-income children’s school readiness: Parent contributions over the first five years. Early Education and Development, 20(6), 958–977.Google Scholar
  26. Clément, M.-È., Bernèche, F., Chamberland, C., & Fontaine, C. (2012). La violence familiale dans la vie des enfants du Québec. Retrieved from http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/publications/conditions/pdf2013/violence-fam.pdf
  27. Cole, S. A. (2005). Foster caregiver motivation and infant attachment: How do reasons for fostering affect relationships? Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 22(5–6), 441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Crittenden, P. M. (2008). Raising parents: Attachment, parenting and child safety. Portland, OR: Willan Pub.Google Scholar
  29. Currie, J., & Widom, C. S. (2010). Long-term consequences of child abuse and neglect on adult economic well-being. Child Maltreatment, 15(2), 111–120. doi: 10.1177/1077559509355316.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Department of Health. (2000). Framework for the assessment of children in need and their Families. Retrieved from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4003256
  31. Drake, B., Jonson-Reid, M., Way, I., & Chung, S. (2003). Substantiation and recidivism. Child Maltreatment, 8(4), 248–260. doi: 10.1177/1077559503258930.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Dubowitz, H., & Bennett, S. (2007). Physical abuse and neglect of children. Lancet, 369(9576), 1891–1899.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test, revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  34. Dunn, L. M., Thériault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Échelle de vocabulaire en image Peabody-adaptation française du Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. Toronto, Canada: Psycan.Google Scholar
  35. Dunst, C. J., Jenkins, V., & Trivette, C. M. (1994). Family needs scale. In C. J. Dunst, C. M. Trivette & A. G. Deal (Eds.), Supporting and strengthening families: Vol. 1. Methods, strategies and practices. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
  36. Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Hamby, D. W. (2006). Technical manual for measuring and evaluating family support program quality and benefits. Ashville, NC: Winterberry Press.Google Scholar
  37. English, D. J., Upadhyaya, M. P., Litrownik, A. J., Marshall, J. M., Runyan, D. K., Graham, J. C., … & Dubowitz, H. (2005). Maltreatment’s wake: the relationship of maltreatment dimensions to child outcomes. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29(5 SPEC. ISS.), 597–619. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.12.008
  38. Éthier, L. S., Lemelin, J. P., & Lacharité, C. (2004). A longitudinal study of the effects of chronic maltreatment on children’s behavioral and emotional problems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 28(12), 1265–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.07.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R., Turner, H., & Hamby, S. L. (2005). The victimization of children and youth: A comprehensive, national survey. Child Maltreatment, 10(1), 5–25. doi: 10.1177/1077559504271287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gilbert, R., Kemp, A., Thoburn, J., Sidebotham, P., Radford, L., Glaser, D., … & MacMillan, H. L. (2009). Recognising and responding to child maltreatment. The Lancet, 373(9658), 167–180. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61707-9
  41. Gilbert, R., Widom, C. S., Browne, K., Fergusson, D., Webb, E., & Janson, S. (2009b). Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. The Lancet, 373(9657), 68–81. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61706-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Harden, B. J., & Whittaker, J. V. (2011). The early home environment and developmental outcomes for young children in the child welfare system. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(8), 1392–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Haskett, M. E., Ahern, L. S., Ward, C. S., & Allaire, J. C. (2006). Factor structure and validity of the parenting stress index-short form. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35(2), 302–312. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hussey, J. M., Marshall, J. M., English, D. J., Knight, E. D., Lau, A. S., Dubowitz, H., … & Kotch, J. B. (2005). Defining maltreatment according to substantiation: Distinction without a difference? Child Abuse and Neglect, 29(5 SPEC. ISS.), 479–492. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.12.005
  45. Jaffee, S. R. (2007). Sensitive, stimulating caregiving predicts cognitive and behavioral resilience in neurodevelopmentally at-risk infants. Development and Psychopathology, 19(3), 631–647. doi: 10.1017/s0954579407000326.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Jonson-Reid, M., Kohl, P. L., & Drake, B. (2012). Child and adult outcomes of chronic child maltreatment. Pediatrics, 129(5), 839–845.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kendall-Tackett, K. A., & Giacomoni, S. (2005). Child victimization. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  48. Kohl, P. L., Jonson-Reid, M., & Drake, B. (2009). Time to leave substantiation behind: Findings from a national probability study. Child Maltreatment, 14(1), 17–26. doi: 10.1177/1077559508326030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kotch, J. B., & Thomas, L. P. (1986). Family and social factors associated with substantiation of child abuse and neglect reports. Journal of Family Violence, 1(2), 167–179. doi: 10.1007/bf00977251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kyte, A., Chamberland, C., Bouchard, V. (submitted). Characteristics of children receiving community versus child protection services. Canadian Social Work Review.Google Scholar
  51. Lacharité, C. (1996). Inventaire de soutien familial, version française. Document interne: GREDEF, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières.Google Scholar
  52. Lacharité, C. (2011). Approche participative avec les parents en contexte d’autorité: Une brève introduction. In M. Boutanquoi (Ed.), Interventions sociales auprès de familles en situation de précarité (pp. 63–72). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  53. Lacharité, C., de Montigny, F., Miron, J. M., Devault, A., Larouche, H., & Desmet, S. (2005). Les services offerts aux familles à risque ou en difficulté: Modèles conceptuels, stratégies d’action et réponses aux besoins des parents. Trois-Rivières, Canada: GREDEF/UQTR.Google Scholar
  54. Lacharité, C., Éthier, L. S., & Couture, G. (1999). Sensibilité et spécificité de l’indice de stress parental face à des situations de mauvais traitements d’enfants. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 31(4), 217–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lacharité, C., Éthier, L. S., & Nolin, P. (2006). Vers une theorie ecosystemique de la negligence envers les enfants. Bulletin de Psychologie, 59(4), 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Leiter, J., Myers, K. A., & Zingraff, M. T. (1994). Substantiated and unsubstantiated cases of child maltreatment: Do their consequences differ? Social Work Research, 18(2), 67–82.Google Scholar
  57. Lemelin, J.-P., & St-Laurent, D. (2002). Traduction révisée du CBCL pour l’ASEBA School-Age Forms. Trois-Rivières, Canada: Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières.Google Scholar
  58. McKenzie, K., Scott, D., Fraser, J. A., & Dunne, N. P. (2011). Assessing the concordance of health and child protection data for ‘maltreated’ and ‘unintentionally injured’ children. Injury Prevention,. doi: 10.1136/ip.2011.031849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Milner, J. S. (1986). The Child Abuse Potential inventory: Manual. Webster, N.C: Psytec.Google Scholar
  60. Milner, J. S. (1994). Assessing physical child abuse risk: The child abuse potential inventory. Clinical Psychology Review, 14(6), 547–583. doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(94)90017-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mistry, R. S., Lowe, E. D., Benner, A. D., & Chien, N. (2008). Expanding the family economic stress model: Insights from a mixed-methods approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(1), 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moreau, J., Chamberland, C., Oxman Martinez, J., Roy, C., Léveillé, S., Laporte, L., & Tabakian, N. (2001). Transmission intergénérationnelle de la maltraitance: Étude des liens entre les facteurs de protection et les facteurs de risque auprès d’une population de mères en difficulté: Rapport d’activités scientifiques. Retrieved from http://www.centrejeunessedemontreal.qc.ca/recherche/PDF/Publications/19-X.pdf
  63. Mueller, S., Maheu, F., Dozier, M., Peloso, E., Mandell, P., & Leibenluft, E. (2010). Early life stress is associated with impairment in cognitive control in adolescence: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 48(10), 3037–3044.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Nikulina, V., Widom, C. S., & Czaja, S. (2011). The Role of Childhood Neglect and Childhood Poverty in Predicting Mental Health, Academic Achievement and Crime in Adulthood. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(3–4), 309–321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Park, J. M., Fertig, A. R., & Allison, P. D. (2011). Physical and mental health, cognitive development, and health care use by housing status of low-income young children in 20 American cities: A prospective cohort study. American Journal of Public Health, 101(S1), 255–261. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2010.300098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peirson, L., Laurendeau, M.-C., & Chamberland, C. (2001). Context, contributing factors, and consequences. In I. Prilleltensky, G. B. Nelson, & L. Peirson (Eds.), Promoting family wellness and preventing child maltreatment: Fundamentals for thinking and action (pp. 419–448). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  67. Pomerleau, A., Vézina, N., Moreau, J., Malcuit, G., & Séguin, R. (2005). Guide d’utilisation de la grille d’évaluation du développement de l’enfant de 0 à 5 ans (GED). Montréal, Canada: Centre de liaison sur l’intervention et la prévention psychosociales (CLIPP).Google Scholar
  68. Putnam-Hornstein, E., & Needell, B. (2011). Predictors of child protective service contact between birth and age five: An examination of California’s 2002 birth cohort. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(11), 2400–2407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rijlaarsdam, J., Tiemeier, H., Hofman, A., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Mackenbach, J. P., Verhulst, F. C., & Stevens, G. W. J. M. (2012). Home environments of infants: Relations with child development through age 3. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-200987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Sameroff, A. J. (2009). The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Slack, K. S., Berger, L. M., DuMont, K., Yang, M. Y., Kim, B., Ehrhard-Dietzel, S., & Holl, J. L. (2011). Risk and protective factors for child neglect during early childhood: A cross-study comparison. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(8), 1354–1363. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stahmer, A. C., Hurlburt, M., Horwitz, S. M., Landsverk, J., Zhang, J., & Leslie, L. K. (2009). Associations between intensity of child welfare involvement and child development among young children in child welfare. Child Abuse and Neglect, 33(9), 598–611. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.008.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Stith, S. M., Liu, T., Davies, L. C., Boykin, E. L., Alder, M. C., Harris, J. M. … & Dees, J. E. M. E. G. (2009). Risk factors in child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(1), 13–29. doi:  10.1016/j.avb.2006.03.006
  74. Trocmé, N., Knoke, D., Fallon, B., & MacLaurin, B. (2009). Differentiating between substantiated, suspected, and unsubstantiated maltreatment in Canada. Child Maltreatment, 14(1), 4–16. doi: 10.1177/1077559508318393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Ward, H., Brown, R., Westlake, D., & Munro, E. R. (2010). Infants suffering, or likely to suffer, significant harm: A prospective longitudinal study. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/RSG/AllPublications/Page1/DFE-RB053

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claire Chamberland
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carl Lacharité
    • 2
  • Marie-Ève Clément
    • 3
  • Danielle Lessard
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Social WorkUniversity of MontréalMontréalCanada
  2. 2.University of Québec at Trois-RivièresTrois-RivièresCanada
  3. 3.University of Québec at OutaouaisSaint-JérômeCanada
  4. 4.University of MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations