Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 95–105 | Cite as

Who Says What: Election Coverage and Sourcing of Child Care in Four Canadian Dailies

  • A. RauhalaEmail author
  • P. Albanese
  • C. Ferns
  • D. Law
  • A. Haniff
  • L. Macdonald
Original Paper


Advocates have called for universal, quality child care in Canada since the 1970s, but the issue seldom appeared to acquire political urgency. The 2006 election campaign seemed different. The governing Liberals promised to devote billions to a nascent national program. The Conservatives promised parents a cash allowance for young children. Child care seemed to be emerging as a significant issue in a political campaign. How was ECEC written about before, during and after Canadian election campaigns? Who is quoted and how? Our project mapped articles about child care in four major Canadian dailies between 2000 and 2008. We found that coverage spiked in 2000 and 2005–2006—during federal elections. Coverage nearly doubled in 2005–2006 in all but one paper. Using content analysis, we compared coverage of child care and sources in the 55 days before the start of campaigning, 55 days of campaigning, and 55 days following the 2006 election. We mapped and compared who said what, and how about child care policy and related issues, in Canada. We found: (1) that newspapers’ ideological slants are apparent in their choice of sources and focus; and (2) that more importantly, despite ideological differences, political figures outnumbered activists, parents and child care providers. With only minor variations across the newspapers, the voices of parents and child care activists were marginal especially in the 55 days of campaigning.


Child care Newspapers Sources Elections Canada 


  1. Altheide, D. (2002). Children and the discourse of fear. Symbolic Interaction, 25(2), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altheide, D. L., & Michalowski, R. S. (1999). Fear in the news: A discourse of control. The Sociological Quarterly, 40(3), 475–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atton, C., & Wickenden, E. (2005). Sourcing routines and representation in alternative journalism: A case study approach. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, H. S. (1967). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benzie, R. (2005). Tories offer deduction for sports fees; Harper woos ‘working families’ says he relates to middle class. Toronto Star, A.06.Google Scholar
  6. Conservative Party of Canada. (2006). Stand up for Canada: Conservative party of Canada federal election platform 2006.
  7. Cottle, S. (2003). News, public relations and power. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, A. (2003). Whither mass media and power? Evidence for a critical elite theory alternative. Media, Culture & Society, 25(5), 669–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Swert, K., & Hooghe, M. (2010). When do women get a voice? Explaining the presence of female news sources in Belgian news broadcasts (2003–2005). European Journal of Communication, 25(1), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorfman, L., & Woodruff, K. (1999). Child care coverage in the U.S. newspapers. Issue 7. Berkeley Media Studies Group. Retrieved July 18, 2008 from
  11. Freeman, D. (2005). Moms lead in self-employment. National Post, SR2.Google Scholar
  12. Friend, C., Challenger, D., & McAdams, K. C. (2005). Contemporary editing. Toronto: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Friendly, M., Beach, J., & Turiano, M. (2002). Early childhood education and care in Canada 2001. Toronto: Childcare Resource and Research Unit, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  14. Friendly, M., & Prentice, S. (2009). About Canada: Childcare. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Globe and Mail website. (2010). Retrieved July 25, 2010 from
  16. Greenberg, J. (2000). Opinion discourse and Canadian newspapers: The case of the Chinese ‘Boat People’. Canadian Journal of Communication, 25(4), 517–537.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the state, and law and order. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  18. Henderson, L., Kitzinger, J., & Green, J. (2000). Representing infant feeding: Content analysis of British media portrayals of bottle feeding and breast feeding. British Medical Journal, 321, 1196–1198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hust, S. J. T., & Andsager, J. L. (2003). Medicalization vs. adaptive models? Sense-making in magazine framing of menopause. Women and Health, 38(1), 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnston, D. D., & Swanson, D. H. (2003). Undermining mothers: A content analysis of the representation of mothers in magazines. Mass Communication and Society, 6(3), 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kunkel, D., Smith, S., Suding, P., & Biely, E. (2002). Coverage in context: How thoroughly the news media report five key children’s issues. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Casey Journalism Center on Children and Families.Google Scholar
  22. Len-Ríos, M. E., Rodgers, S., Thorson, E., & Yoon, D. (2005). Representation of women in news and photos: Comparing content to perceptions. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 152–168.Google Scholar
  23. Manning, P. (2001). News and news sources: A critical introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Marsh, E. M., & White, M. D. (2003). A taxonomy of relationships between images and text. Journal of Documentation, 59(6), 647–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McManus, M., & Dorfman, L. (2002). Silent revolution: How U.S. newspapers portray child care. Issue 11. Berkeley Media Studies Group. Retrieved July 18, 2008 from
  26. O’Neil, P. (2005). Tories offer $80 tax break to help pay for children’s activities. Ottawa Citizen, A1.Google Scholar
  27. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2004). OECD thematic review of early childhood education and care: Canada country note. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  28. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2006). Starting strong 2. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  29. Pruitt, S., & Mullen, P. (2005). Contraception or abortion? Inaccurate descriptions of emergency contraception in newspaper articles, 1992–2002. Contraception, 71(1), 14–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rich, C. (1997). Writing and reporting news: A coaching method (pp. 37–42). Toronto: Wadsworth Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  31. Rinehart, D. (2007). The daycare campaign revisited: From baby steps to beer and popcorn. Policy Options, 29(7), 47–52.Google Scholar
  32. Rinehart, D. (2008). Baby talk: How gender issues affected media coverage of the child-care debate in the last federal election. Canadian Journal of Media Studies, 4(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
  33. Royal Commission on the Status of Women. (1970). Report on the Royal Commission on the Status of Women. Ottawa: Information Canada.Google Scholar
  34. Russial, J. (2004). Strategic copy editing (p. 83). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Scanlan, C. (2010). The quote diet. Poynter online. Retrieved from
  36. Scherer, R. K. (2001). Federal child care policy development: From World War II to 2000. In S. Prentice (Ed.), Changing child care (pp. 187–198). Halifax: Fernwood.Google Scholar
  37. Schlesinger, P., & Tumber, H. (1999). Reporting crime: The media politics of criminal justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994). In H. Tumber (Ed.), News: A reader (pp. 257–266). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Theriault, L. (2006). The national post and the nanny state: Framing the child care debate in Canada. Canadian Review of Social Policy, 56, 140–148.Google Scholar
  39. UNICEF. (2008). The child care transition: A league table of early childhood education and care in economically advanced countries. (innocenti report card 8). Florence: Peter Adamson.Google Scholar
  40. Weeks, C. (2006). Liberal child-care deals are history, Tories confirm. Ottawa Citizen, A3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Rauhala
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Albanese
    • 1
  • C. Ferns
    • 2
  • D. Law
    • 1
  • A. Haniff
    • 1
  • L. Macdonald
    • 1
  1. 1.Ryerson UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Childcare Research and Resource UnitTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations