Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 53–64 | Cite as

Family Policy in South Korea: Development, Current Status, and Challenges

  • Meejung Chin
  • Jaerim Lee
  • Soyoung Lee
  • Seohee Son
  • Miai Sung
Original Paper


We provide a comprehensive review of family policy in South Korea (Korea hereafter) for international readers. Alarmed by recent social and demographic changes, the Korean government has started to establish explicit family policies from the mid 2000s. These policies have signified a symbolic attention shift to family matters in the history of social policy in Korea. In this paper, we focus on three areas of family policy: (a) work-family policies, (b) a healthy family policy, and (c) a policy for multi-cultural families. Work-family policies aim to help working families with young children balance work responsibilities and family caregiving through multiple leave options and child care support. The Framework Act on Healthy Families, the first explicit family policy in Korea, requires local governments to provide family services through Healthy Family Support Centers. The Multi-Cultural Family Support Act also established a formal support system for multi-cultural families with immigrant spouses, a population group that has recently increased in Korea. We further discuss the domestic and comparative contexts of Korean family policy and provide suggestions for the remaining challenges.


Child care policy Framework Act on Healthy Families of Korea Korean family policy Multi-cultural family support policy Work-family policy 


  1. Act on Equal Employment and Support for Work-Family Balance, Republic of Korea Law (2007, last amendment in 2010). Retrieved from
  2. Ahlberg, J., Roman, C., & Duncan, S. (2008). Actualizing the “democratic family?” Swedish policy rhetoric versus family practices. Social Politics, 15, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atoh, M. (2008). The relevance of ideational changes to family transformation in postwar Japan. In R. Jayakody, A. Thorton, & W. Axinn (Eds.), International family change: Ideational perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2006). Real world evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Bang, H.-N. (2009). The effect of social expenditure on economic development (2nd year): Suggestions for increasing social expenditure in labor-related areas (Co-Investigation Research Report No. 09–27-04). Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  6. Berggeren, H. M. (2008). US family—leave policy: The legacy of ‘separate spheres’. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17, 312–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogenschneider, K. (2006). Family policy matters: How policymaking affects families and what professionals can do (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. J. (2010). Family policy: Becoming a field of inquiry and subfield of social policy. Journal of Marriage and Families, 72, 783–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, K. (2009). Family, life course, and politics: The micro foundation of compressed modernity. Seoul: Changbisa.Google Scholar
  10. Cho, J.-E. (2009). Work-family policies: Limitations and suggestions (Current Issues Report No. 51). Seoul: National Assembly Research Service.Google Scholar
  11. Choi, Y. (2010). Trends or praxis? Discourse analysis and reflection of multicultural families in family studies. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 27(6), 171–187.Google Scholar
  12. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Family-Friendly Social Environment Promotion Act, Republic of Korea Law (2007, last amendment in 2010). Retrieved from
  14. Framework Act on Healthy Families, Republic of Korea Law (2004, last amendment in 2010). Retrieved from
  15. Goodman, R., & Peng, I. (1996). The East Asian welfare state: Peripatetic learning, adaptive change, and national building. In G. Esping-Andersen (Ed.), Welfare states in transition: National adaptation of global economies (pp. 192–224). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Headquarters of Healthy Family Support Centers. (2010). 2009 Annual report on Healthy Family Support Center.Google Scholar
  17. Headquarters of Healthy Family Support Centers. (2011). 2011 Operational guidelines.Google Scholar
  18. Hong, S. (2008). Work-family balance and policy directions in Korea. In Korean Women’s Development Institute (Ed.), International symposium: Balancing work and family: Current issues and policy directions (pp. 253–267). Seoul: Hong.Google Scholar
  19. Huston, A. (2008). From research to policy and back. Child Development, 79, 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Infant Care Act, Republic of Korea Law (1991, last amendment in 2010). Retrieved from
  21. Ingoldsby, B. B., & Smith, S. D. (Eds.). (2006). Families in global and multicultural perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Kim, H. (2008). The duality of family changes in Korea. The Journal of Asian Women, 47(2), 7–37.Google Scholar
  23. Kim, M. (2009). The phases of progress of multi-cultural society and a view of the policy: Multi-cultural policy in Korea and Advanced Nations. Korea Journal of Public Administration, 47(4), 193–223.Google Scholar
  24. Koh, S. (2009). Multi-cultural family support center evaluation report (Report No. 2009-76). Seoul: The Headquarters of Multi-Cultural Family Support Centers.Google Scholar
  25. Korea National Statistical Office. (2005). Korea society index.Google Scholar
  26. Korea National Statistical Office. (2007a). Demographic change statistics.Google Scholar
  27. Korea National Statistical Office. (2007b). Korea society index.Google Scholar
  28. Korea National Statistical Office. (2009). Korea society index.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, J. (2009). Motivations for providing and utilizing grandmaternal child care for employed mothers in South Korea (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3371875).Google Scholar
  30. Lynch, E. W., & Hanson, M. J. (2004). Developing cross-cultural competence: A guide for working with children and their families. Baltimore, MA: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Ministry of Gender Equality and Family. (2010). Danuri: Multicultural family portal. Retrieved from
  32. Ministry of Gender Equality and Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs. (2005). National child care and education survey, 2004 (Policy Report No. 2005-08 and Research Report No. 2005-07). Seoul: Ministry of Gender Equality and Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  33. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan. (2005). Brief overview of 2004 pension plan revision. Retrieved from
  34. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2010). Child care statistics, 2009 (Publication No. 11-1351000-000016-10). Retrieved from
  35. Miyamoto, T. (1999). Fukushi Kokka to Iu Senryaku: Sweden Moderu no Seiji Keizai Gaku. Kyoto: Horitsu Bunkasha.Google Scholar
  36. Multi-Cultural Family Support Act, Republic of Korea Law (2008, last amendment in 2010). Retrieved from
  37. Ooms, T. (1990). Families and government: Implementing a family perspective in public policy. Social Thoughts, 16, 61–78.Google Scholar
  38. Paik, H. Y. (2010). Multi-cultural family support center service evaluation report and 2011 service planning. Retrieved from The Headquarters of Multi-Cultural Family Support Centers Web site:
  39. Saleeby, D. (1992). The strengths perspective in social work. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  40. Seol, D.-H., & Yoon, H.-S. (2008). Socioeconomic adaptation and welfare policy for immigrant women on marriage: Similarities and differences among countries of origin. Korean Journal of Social Security, 24(2), 109–133.Google Scholar
  41. Shwalb, D. W., Nakazawa, J., Yamamoto, T., & Hyun, J. H. (2004). Fathering in Japanese, Chinese, and Korean cultures: A review of the research literature. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Song, H., & Jeong, Y. (2008). The evaluation and alternative on the educational work in Healthy Family Support Center. Journal of Korean Family Resource Management, 12(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  43. Statistics Korea. (2011a). Composite economic index.Google Scholar
  44. Statistics Korea. (2011b). Use of maternity leave and child care leave. Retrieved from
  45. The World Bank. (2009). World Development Indicators 2009. Retrieved from
  46. Trask, B. S., & Hamon, R. R. (Eds.). (2007). Cultural diversity and families: Expanding perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Women Migrants Human Rights Center. (2008). 2008 white paper on female migrants for marriage. Seoul: Women Migrants Human Rights.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meejung Chin
    • 1
  • Jaerim Lee
    • 2
  • Soyoung Lee
    • 3
  • Seohee Son
    • 4
  • Miai Sung
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Child Development and Family StudiesSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Family and Housing StudiesYeungnam UniversityKyeongbukSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Family and Child StudiesMontclair State UniversityMontclairUSA
  4. 4.Department of Family and Resource ManagementSookmyung Women’s UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  5. 5.Department of Home EconomicsKorea National Open UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations