Abstract
Connectedness between children and their family is a major factor that distinguishes between collective and individualistic cultures. The Multigenerational Interconnectedness Scale, measuring adolescents-family connectedness was administered to adolescents in nine western and eastern countries. The findings show that connectedness in eastern countries was higher than that in western ones. Female adolescents were more connected to their families than males. Connectedness was higher among families with a higher economic level and where the parents had more education. Financial and functional connectedness was associated with adolescents’ better mental health, whereas emotional connectedness (or dependency) was associated with psychological disorders. The association between connectedness and psychological disorders was not the same across countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alkernawi, A. (2000). Ethno-psychiatry in the Bedouin Arab society in the Negev [in Hebrew]. Tel Aviv, Israel: Hakebutz Hameo’had.
Alkernawi, A., & Graham, J. R. (1997). Spirit possession and exorcism in the treatment of a Bedouin-Arabic psychiatric patient. Clinical Social Work Journal, 25, 211–222.
Blos, P. (1967). The second individuation process of adolescence. Psychoanalytic Studies of the Child, 22, 162–186.
Dwairy, M. (1998). Cross-cultural counseling: The Arab-Palestinian case. New York: Haworth Press.
Dwairy, M. (2002). Foundations of psychosocial dynamic personality theory of collective people. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 343–360.
Dwairy, M. (2003). Validation of multigenerational interconnectedness scale among Arab adolescents. Psychological Reports, 93, 697–704.
Dwairy, M. (2004). Internal-structural validity of objective measure of ego-identity status among Arab adolescents. Identity: An international Journal of Theory and Research, 4, 133–144.
Dwairy, M. (2006). Counseling and psychotherapy with Arabs and Muslims: A culturally sensitive approach. New York: Teachers College Press, Colombia University.
Dwairy, M., Achoui, M., Abouserie, R., & Farah, A. (2006). Adolescent-family connectedness among Arabs: A second cross-regional research study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 248–261.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Gavazzi, S. M., & Sabatelli, R. M. (1988). Multigenerational interconnectedness and family involvement: Assessing levels of individuation in adolescence and early adulthood. Paper presented at the National Council of Family Relations 50th Annual Conference, Philadelphia.
Gavazzi, S. M., & Sabatelli, R. M. (1990). Family system dynamics, the individuation process, and psychosocial development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 500–519.
Gavazzi, S. M., Sabatelli, R. M., & Reese-Weber, M. J. (1999). Measurement of financial, functional, and psychological connections in families: Conceptual development and empirical use of the multigenerational interconnectedness scale. Psychological Reports, 84, 1361–1371.
Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Kagitcibasi, C., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2006). Families across cultures: A 30-nation psychological studies. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Georgas, J., Mylonas, K., Bafiti, T., Poortinga, Y. H., Christakopoulou, S., Kagitcibasi, C., et al. (2001). Functional relationships in the nuclear and extended family: A 16 culture study. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 289–300.
Gray, J. (1993). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationships. NY: HarperCollins.
Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Linking social change and developmental change: Shifting pathways of human development. Developmental Psychology, 45, 401–418.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1996). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1(3), 180–186.
Kagitcibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 1–20.
Lopez, F. G., & Gover, M. (1993). Self-report measure of parent-adolescent attachment and separation-individuation: A selective review. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71, 560–569.
Mahler, M., Bergman, A., & Pine, F. (1975). The psychological birth of the infant: Symbiosis and individuation. New York: Basic Books.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1998). The cultural psychology of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 63–87.
Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism. American Psychologist, 43, 15–22.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. San Francisco: Westview Press.
Acknowledgments
We thank Anna Filus (Poland), Neharika Vohra (India), Martina Casullo (Argentina), Parissa Rezvan nia (France), Huda Nijm (Jordan), and Lana Shhadi (Bedouins in Israel) for their help in translating and administrating the questionnaires and encoding the data of their countries.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dwairy, M., Achoui, M. Adolescents-Family Connectedness: A First Cross-Cultural Research on Parenting and Psychological Adjustment of Children. J Child Fam Stud 19, 8–15 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9335-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9335-1