Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A novel model of avalanche current generation in the GaN HEMT equivalent circuit

  • 6 Accesses

Abstract

We consider the large-signal equivalent circuit of a field-effect transistor (FET) with characteristics and parameters calculated using a two-dimensional (2D) quasi-hydrodynamic model while taking into account the electron velocity overshoot. In accordance with this equivalent circuit when applied to an AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistor (HEMT), the avalanche current (in the feedback branch) is zero at all operating points. However, this contradicts the significant difference seen between the results of time-domain simulations of a radiofrequency (RF) amplifier in which the transistor is simulated using a 2D model that does versus does not include the avalanche multiplication of the charge carriers. We propose a new model for the avalanche current generation, based on such simulations including the avalanche multiplication and on the theory of impact-ionization avalanche transit-time (IMPATT) diodes. This model allows the synthesis of amplifiers with high power-added efficiency (PAE).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

References

  1. 1.

    Garber, G.Z.: Numerical modeling of the characteristics of nonlinear equivalent circuits for s.h.f. Schottky-gate GaAs field-effect transistors. Sov. Microelectron. 22, 202–207 (1991)

  2. 2.

    Garber, G.Z.: Method for simulating efficient RF operation of HEMTs. J. Comput. Electron. 17, 419–426 (2018)

  3. 3.

    Garber, G.Z.: Mathematical aspects of simulating efficient RF operation of HEMTs. J. Comput. Electron. 17, 1676–1684 (2018)

  4. 4.

    Nanjo, T., Imai, A., Kurahashi, K., Matsuda, T., Suita, M., Yagyu, E.: Effect of high-temperature annealing for single-Ni-layer gate in AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistors. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55(5S), 05FK05-1–05FK05-6 (2016)

  5. 5.

    Bellotti, E., Moresco, M., Bertazzi, F.: Theory of high field transport and impact ionization in III-Nitride semiconductors. In: IWCE 2010: International Workshop on Computational Electronics, Pisa, October 27–29, 2010. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Theory-of-high-field-transport-and-impact-in-Bellotti-Moresco/9f3cb43ae8b66240c51061841afd3bff4a567e49. Accessed 23 Jan 2020

  6. 6.

    Garber, G.Z.: Quasi-hydrodynamic modeling of heterostructure field-effect transistors. J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 48, 114–117 (2003)

  7. 7.

    Lee, J.-W., Kumar, V., Adesida, I.: High-power-density 0.25 µm gate-length AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistors on semi-insulating 6H–SiC substrates. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45(1A), 13–17 (2006)

  8. 8.

    Garber, G.Z.: Estimation of the accuracy of the microwave FET equivalent circuit using the quasi-hydrodynamic model of electron transport. Solid-State Electron. 103, 115–121 (2015)

  9. 9.

    Garber, G.Z.: Foundations of Excel VBA Programming and Numerical Methods. Moscow: PRINTKOM (2013). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274891843_Foundations_of_Excel_VBA_Programming_and_Numerical_Methods. Accessed 23 Jan 2020

  10. 10.

    Zakharov, A.L., Martirosov, I.M.: Theory of electrical properties of avalanche multiplication in the reverse biased pn junction. Phys. Tech. Semicond. 1, 1777–1786 (1967). (in Russian)

  11. 11.

    Ohno, Y., Nakao, T., Kishimoto, S., Maezawa, K., Mizutani, T.: Effects of surface passivation on breakdown of AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2184–2186 (2004)

  12. 12.

    Garber, G.Z.: Mathematical simulation for estimating the potential of the hydrogen-terminated diamond FET in the mm-wave range. J. Comput. Electron. 15, 181–190 (2016)

  13. 13.

    Shin, D.-H., Yom, I.-B., Kim, D.-W.: A decade-bandwidth distributed power amplifier MMIC using 0.25 μm GaN HEMT technology. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 17(4), 178–180 (2017)

  14. 14.

    Kim, S., Lee, M.-P., Hong, S.-J., Kim, D.-W.: Ku-band 50 W GaN HEMT power amplifier using asymmetric power combining of transistor cells. Micromachines 9, 619–626 (2018)

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Gennadiy Z. Garber.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: The method for calculating the functions \(\varphi_{0} (y)\) and \(n_{0} (y)\)

To formulate the conditions at the left and right boundaries of the transistor active subregion (at \(x = x_{\rm l}\) and \(x = x_{\rm r}\) shown in Fig. 2), consider the model stated by Eqs. (2)–(7) in the one-dimensional approximation under thermodynamic equilibrium: \(\partial /\partial x = \partial /\partial t = 0\), \(T_{\rm e} = T_{0}\), and \(j_{ny} = j_{nuy} = 0\). Equation (3) gives

$$ \frac{{kT_{0} }}{q}\frac{{\text{d}}}{{{\text{d}}y}}\left[ {\mu_{0} (y)n_{0} (y)} \right] = - \mu_{0} (y)F_{ny} (y)n_{0} (y), $$

where \(\mu_{0} (y)\) is the low-field electron mobility and \(n_{0} (y)\) is the electron concentration. The last subscript 0, as in \(\varphi_{0} (y)\) below, stands for thermodynamic equilibrium. Using Eqs. (7) and (8), we have

$$ \frac{{kT_{0} }}{q}\frac{{\text{d}}}{{{\text{d}}y}}\left[ {\mu_{0} (y)n_{0} (y)} \right] = \mu_{0} (y)n_{0} (y)\frac{{\text{d}}}{{{\text{d}}y}}\left[ {\varphi_{0} (y) + X_{\rm e} (y)} \right], $$

where \(\varphi_{0} (y)\) is the electric potential.

Dividing both sides of this equation by \(kT_{0} \mu_{0} n_{0} /q\) yields

$$ \frac{{\text{d}}}{{{\text{d}}y}}\ln \left[ {\mu_{0} (y)n_{0} (y)} \right] = \frac{{\text{d}}}{{{\text{d}}y}}\left[ {\frac{{\varphi_{0} (y) + X_{\rm e} (y)}}{{kT_{0} /q}}} \right]. $$

Integration yields

$$ \ln \left[ {\mu_{0} (y)n_{0} (y)} \right] = \frac{{\varphi_{0} (y) + X_{\rm e} (y)}}{{kT_{0} /q}} + C, $$

where C is a constant of integration. If \(\varphi_{0} (0)\) = \(X_{\rm e} (0)\) = 0 and \(n_{0} (0)\) = \(N_{\rm d} (0)\), we have

$$ n_{0} (y) = \frac{{\mu_{0} (0)N_{\rm d} (0)}}{{\mu_{0} (y)}}\exp \left[ {\frac{{\varphi_{0} (y) + X_{\rm e} (y)}}{{kT_{0} /q}}} \right]. $$
(16)

Substitution of this expression into Eq. (6) yields the following equation:

$$ \frac{{\text{d}}}{{{\text{d}}y}}\left( {\varepsilon \frac{{{\text{d}}\varphi_{0} }}{{{\text{d}}y}}} \right) = Q(y), $$

where \(Q(y) = q\left\{ {\frac{{\mu_{0} (0)N_{\rm d} (0)}}{{\mu_{0} (y)}}\exp \left[ {\frac{{\varphi_{0} (y) + X_{\rm e} (y)}}{{kT_{0} /q}}} \right] - N_{\rm d} (y)} \right\}\).

We solve the last equation with the boundary conditions \(\varphi_{0} (0)\) = 0 and \({\text{d}}\varphi_{0} /{\text{d}}y\) = 0 at \(y = y_{\rm m}\) by the quasilinearization method for the Shockley–Poisson equation, according to Chap. 3 of Ref. [9]. The resulting function, \(\varphi_{0} (y)\), and the function \(n_{0} (y)\) calculated by formula (16) are plotted in Fig. 7.

Appendix 2: The method for solving the \(i_{{{\text{am}}}}\) generator equation with the condition of periodicity

Write Eq. (15) in the canonical form

$$ \frac{{{\text{d}}z}}{{{\text{d}}t}} + P(t)z = R, $$
(17)

where \(z = i_{{{\text{am}}}} (t)\), \(P(t) = \frac{{1 - \Phi^{\prime}[u_{{{\text{gs}}}} (t),u_{{{\text{ds}}}}^{{}} (t)]}}{{\tau_{\lambda } }}\), and \(R = \frac{{I_{{\text{r}}} }}{{\tau_{\lambda } }}\). The coefficient \(P(t)\) is periodic with period T. To obtain a cyclic solution, suppose that \(z(t)\) is a linear combination of the following two functions:

  • \(u(t)\), solution of Eq. (17) with zero initial condition, \(u(0)=0\), and

  • \(v(t)\), solution of Eq. (17) with zero right-hand side, \(R=0\), and unity initial condition, \(v(0)=1\).

Substituting \(z(t) = \alpha u(t) + \beta v(t)\) into Eq. (17), we obtain \(\alpha = 1\). The condition of periodicity, \(z(0) = z(T)\), gives \(\beta = \frac{u(T)}{{1 - v(T)}}\).

The initial value problems for \(u(t)\) and \(v(t)\),

$$ \begin{aligned} \frac{{{\text{d}}u}}{{{\text{d}}t}} & = - P(t)u + R,\quad u(0) = 0, \\ \frac{{{\text{d}}v}}{{{\text{d}}t}} & = - P(t)v,\quad v(0) = 1, \\ \end{aligned} $$

are considered on a uniform grid constructed in \([0,\,\,T]\) for analyzing the IFET equivalent circuit. (In our case, this grid has 73 nodes, including the boundary nodes.) To solve these initial value problems, we use the method in Sect. 5.2 of Ref. [9], which is based on the quadratic spline construction.

Using the obtained \(u(t)\) and \(v(t)\), we calculate the avalanche current using the formula

$$ i_{{{\text{am}}}} (t) = z(t) = u(t) + \frac{u(T)}{{1 - v(T)}}v(t). $$
(18)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garber, G.Z. A novel model of avalanche current generation in the GaN HEMT equivalent circuit. J Comput Electron (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10825-020-01452-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Full 2D model
  • Harmonic balance method
  • Large-signal equivalent circuit
  • Quasi-hydrodynamic model
  • RF amplifier
  • Splines