An optimum side-lobe reduction method with weight perturbation

  • Jafar Ramadhan MohammedEmail author


Generally, the phased antennas used in radar and communication systems have a certain taper to minimize the side-lobes. However, most tapering methods are inefficient for practical applications because they generally reduce the overall efficiency of the system. It is therefore necessary to develop improved methods for reducing the side-lobes, especially for future fifth-generation (5G) communication systems, whose performance is expected to be drastically limited by interfering signals. Two new methods for obtaining low side-lobes with very little loss in directivity are presented herein. In both methods, the excitations of the elements in a uniformly excited array are perturbed such that the corresponding array factor constructs a specific cancellation pattern. The cancellation pattern in the first method is constructed using a simple analytical procedure, whereas in the second method it is constructed using a more powerful optimization algorithm. The cancellation patterns of both proposed arrays are then independently subtracted from the original, uniformly excited arrays to obtain new array patterns with deep side-lobe reduction. The simulation results show that the directivity differences between the two proposed arrays and the uniformly excited array decrease as the number of array elements is increased; For example, when considering an array with 100 elements, the directivity difference is only 0.1435 dB. Moreover, the proposed arrays can reduce the peak side-lobe levels by more than 27 dB compared with the corresponding uniformly excited arrays.


Antenna arrays Radiation pattern synthesis Side-lobe reduction 



  1. 1.
    Balanis, C.A.: Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Safaai-Jazi, A., Stutzman, W.L.: A new low-sidelobe pattern synthesis technique for equally spaced linear arrays. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 64(4), 1317–1324 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohammed, J.R.: Phased array antenna with ultra-low sidelobes. Electron. Lett. 49(17), 1055–1056 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mohammed, J.R., Sayidmarie, K.H.: Null steering method by controlling two elements. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 8(15), 1348–1355 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rocca, P., Mailloux, R.J., Toso, G.: GA-based optimization of irregular subarray layouts for wideband phased arrays design. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 14, 131–134 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steyskal, H., Shore, R.A., Haupt, R.L.: Methods for null control and their effects on the radiation pattern. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 34, 404–409 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rahman, S.U., Qunsheng, C., Muhammad, M., Hisham, K.: Analysis for linear antenna array for minimum sidelobe level, half power beamwidth, and null control using PSO. J. Microw. Optoelectron. Electromagn. Appl. 16(2), 577–591 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khodier, M.M., Christodoulou, C.G.: Linear array geometry synthesis with minimum sidelobe level and null control using particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 53(8), 2674–2679 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trastoy, A., Ares, F., Moreno, E.: Phase-only control of antenna sum and shaped patterns through null perturbation. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 43(6), 45–54 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith, S.K., Bregains, J.C., Melde, K.L., Ares, F.: A comparison of optimization techniques for power patterns with low sidelobes generated by linear arrays with efficient excitation distribution. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 45(1), 57–60 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prerna, S., Ashwin, K.: Ant lion optimization algorithm to control sidelobe level and null depths in linear antenna arrays. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 70(9), 1339–1349 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gopi, R., Durbadal, M., Rajib, K., Sakti, P.G.: Directivity maximization and optimal far-field pattern of time modulated linear antenna arrays using evolutionary algorithms. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 69(12), 1800–1809 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Banerjee, S., Mandal, D.: Array pattern optimization for a steerable circular isotropic antenna array using the firefly algorithm. J. Comput. Electron. 16(3), 952–976 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Faridani, M., Ghalamkari, B.: Four-element lens array antenna for advanced point-to-(multi)point high-bandwidth wireless communication. J. Comput. Electron. 17(3), 1082–1089 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mohammed, J.R.: Optimal null steering method in uniformly excited equally spaced linear arrays by optimizing two edge elements. Electron. Lett. 53(13), 835–837 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohammed, J.R.: A new antenna array pattern synthesis method with sidelobe control. Int. J. Telecommun. Electron. Comput. Eng. 10(3), 31–36 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haupt, R.L.: Adaptive nulling with weight constraints. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B 26, 23–38 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Safaai-Jazi, A., Stutzman, W.L.: Side lobe reduction in uniformly excited linear arrays. In: IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (AP-S 2015), pp. 2449–2450 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Electronics EngineeringNinevah UniversityMosulIraq

Personalised recommendations