Art investment: hedging or safe haven through financial crises
We analyze long-term art auction sales data focusing on and around financial crisis periods with other investment returns to understand whether art can be considered a safe haven during volatile times or a hedging option in general by analyzing art auction data in a volatile emerging market. Our findings suggest Turkish art returns are either negatively correlated or at low correlation with other investments, including the equity market. We have the view that art can be considered a hedging mechanism on average to enhance returns and to decrease the risk of portfolios and improve diversification. However, we do not discard the safe-haven hypothesis, either. Although the auction data on the crisis period is limited, results of and around crisis periods show art returns are positively correlated with various volatility indices. In addition, the number of art transactions also increases after the crisis years, which may be a sign of liquidity requirement of some investors and an opportunity for buyers. The benefit is visible especially during years of contractions, which do not end with a very severe crisis, since the art auction market liquidity dries if the crisis is severe.
KeywordsArt market Hedonic price index Portfolio choice Financial crises Emerging markets Investment Risk Hedging Diversification
JEL ClassificationG1 G11 G15 Z11
The authors would like to thank Mr. Raffi Portakal for providing the database, Miss Ezgi Ariduru, Ph.D. student Sinan Tasliklioglu for the digital transformation of the database, Professor Nurhan Davutyan for his comments and two anonymous referees of Journal of Cultural Economics for their helpful and constructive comments that greatly contributed to improving the paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, they received no Grant for this work and this study complies with ethical standards.
- Baumol, W. J. (1986). Unnatural value: Or art investment as floating crap game. The American Economic Review,76(2), 10–14.Google Scholar
- Campos, N. F., & Barbosa, R. L. (2008). Paintings and numbers: An econometric investigation of sales rates, prices and returns in Latin American art auctions. IZA discussion papers, no. 3445.Google Scholar
- Comert, H., & Yeldan, E. (2018). A tale of three crises in Turkey: 1994, 2001 and 2008–09. ERC working papers 1809, ERC—Economic Research Center, Middle East Technical University.Google Scholar
- Cornett, M. M., Mehran, H., Pan, K., Phan, M., & Wei, C. (2014). CDS and equity market reactions to stock issuances in the US financial industry: Evidence from the 2002–13 period. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports N. 697 (November).Google Scholar
- Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report. (2018).Google Scholar
- David, G. (2014). Is art really a safe heaven? Evidence from the French art market during WWI. Working paper (Vol. 32).Google Scholar
- De la Barre, M., Sophie, D., & Ginsburgh, V. (1994). Returns of impressionist, and contemporary paintings European modern. Annaless d’Economie et de Statistique,35(35), 143–181.Google Scholar
- Edwards, S. (2004). The economics of Latin American Art: Creativity patterns and rates of return. Economia,4, 1–36.Google Scholar
- Eurostat. (2011). Handbook on residential property prices indexes. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/hicp/methodology/owner_occupied_housing_hpi/rppi_handbook.
- Ferguson, H. (2011). A moveable empire: Ottoman nomads, migrants & refugees. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
- Goetzmann, W. N. (1993). Accounting for taste: Art and the financial markets over three centuries. The American Economic Review,83(5), 1370–1376.Google Scholar
- Ekelund, R. B. Jr., Jackson, J. D., & Tollison, R. D. (2017). The economics of American Art issues, artists and market institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN-10: 0190657898.Google Scholar
- Kraeussl, R., & van Elsland, N. (2008). Constructing the true art market index: A novel 2-step hedonic approach and its application to the German art market. CFS working paper.Google Scholar
- McCauley, R., & McGuire, P. (2009). Dollar appreciation in 2008: Safe haven, carry trades, dollar shortage and overhedging. BIS Quarterly Review,16, 85–93.Google Scholar
- Pesando, J. E. (1993). Art as an investment: The market for modern prints. American Economic Review,83(5), 1075–1089.Google Scholar
- Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Renneboog, L., & Spaenjers, C. (2009). Buying beauty: On prices and returns in the art market. CentER discussion paper (Vol. 2009–15).Google Scholar
- Seçkin, A., & Atukeren, E. (2006). Art and the economy: A first look at the market for paintings in Turkey. Economics Bulletin,26(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
- Shaw, W. M. (2011). Ottoman painting: Reflections of Western art from the Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic. IB Tauris.om the Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic.Google Scholar
- Triplett, J. (2004). Handbook on hedonic indexes and quality adjustments in price indexes: Special application to information technology products. Technology and industry working papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/643587187107.
- Triplett, J. E., & McDonald, R. J. (1977). Assessing the quality error in output measures: The case of refrigerators. Review of Income and Wealth,23(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1977.tb00008.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- UBS Global Art Report, pp. 1–408. (2019).Google Scholar
- Yalcin, S. (2007). Paris’ in En Ünlü Resim Koleksiyoncusu Bir Osmanlı Paşasıydı. Hurriyet. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/paris-in-en-unlu-resim-koleksiyoncusu-bir-osmanli-pasasiydi-7250057.
- Yalman, S. (2000). The art of the Ottomans before 1600. Heilbrunn timeline of art history. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar