Journal of Cultural Economics

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 419–445 | Cite as

Netflix: global hegemon or facilitator of frictionless digital trade?

  • Luis Aguiar
  • Joel Waldfogel
Original Article


Trade in cultural products has traditionally been constrained by a combination of law and technology. In Europe, digital sellers based in a given EU country are not always able to distribute across borders. In January 2016, US-based Netflix announced an expansion to 243 countries, accomplishing cross-border distribution through business strategy. Changes in law or technology that facilitate cross-national cultural trade have traditionally drawn the concern of observers worried about the cultural heritage—and products—of small markets. The expansion raises questions about what Netflix is doing. Is it a cultural hegemon, distributing US fare into 243 countries? Or it is a facilitator of free trade, making the products of even small countries more available outside their home markets (relative to traditional distribution)? And how does the curated model—which limits the number of movies the platform wants to distribute—affect Netflix’s function? To shed light on these questions, we develop a new measure of the global availability of a repertoire, the value-weighted geographic reach. Using this measure we find, first, that Netflix makes many of the works from a wide variety of countries available in many other countries. Second, we find that theatrical distribution strongly advantages US-origin fare. Third, the pattern of origin repertoire available through Netflix also favors the USA, although less overwhelmingly. Moreover, many countries are relatively advantaged by their Netflix availability patterns. Finally, we discuss some issues related to the Netflix platform, including horizontal competition with other platforms, vertical struggles with content providers (and its backward integration into production), and we speculate on possible challenges for regulators.


Cultural trade Movie industry Online distribution Netflix 

JEL Classification

Z10 Z18 L82 


  1. Aguiar, L., & Waldfogel, J. (2014). Digitization, copyright, and the welfare effects of music trade. JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2014-05, Directorate Growth & Innovation and JRC-Seville, Joint Research Centre.Google Scholar
  2. Blum, B. S., & Goldfarb, A. (2006). Does the internet defy the law of gravity? Journal of International Economics, 70, 384–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Disdier, A.-C., Tai, S. H. T., Fontagné, L., & Mayer, T. (2010). Bilateral trade of cultural goods. Review of World Economics, 145, 575–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. European Commission. (2015). A digital single market strategy for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM (2015) 192 final, European Commission.Google Scholar
  5. Ferreira, F., & Waldfogel, J. (2013). Pop internationalism: Has half a century of world music trade displaced local culture? The Economic Journal, 123, 634–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. George, L. M., & Waldfogel, J. (2006). The New York Times and the Market for local newspapers. American Economic Review, 96, 435–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hanson, G. H., & Xiang, C. (2008). Testing the Melitz model of trade: An application to U.S. Motion Picture Exports. Working Paper 14461, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  8. Herrera, E. G., & Martens, B. (2015). Language, copyright and geographic segmentation in the EU Digital Single Market for music and film. JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2015-04, Directorate Growth & Innovation and JRC-Seville, Joint Research Centre.Google Scholar
  9. Renda, A., Simonelli, F., Mazziotti, G., Bolognini, A., Luchetta, G. (2015). The implementation, application and effects of the EU Directive on copyright in the Information Society. CEPS Special Report 120, Centre for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  10. Richardson, M. (2006). Commercial broadcasting and local content: Cultural quotas, advertising and public stations. The Economic Journal, 116, 605–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Waldfogel, J. (2016). Cinematic explosion: New products, unpredictability, and realized quality in the digital era. Journal of Industrial Economics, 64, 755–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Digital Economy Unit, Joint Research CenterEuropean CommissionSevilleSpain
  2. 2.Carlson School of Management, Department of EconomicsUniversity of Minnesota and NBERMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations