“Selling less of more?” The impact of digitization on record companies
- 1.5k Downloads
In this paper, we use data from a survey of 151 French record companies to test the “long-tail” hypothesis at the level of the firm. More specifically, we test whether, following the “selling less of more” principle coined by Anderson (2006), record companies that have adapted to digitization (at various levels: artists’ scouting, distribution, and promotion) release more new albums without having higher overall sales. We construct a production function in which the output is produced from conventional inputs of labor and capital, as well as inputs that are more specific to the recorded music industry. We consider two types of output: a commercial output (albums sales) and a creative output (number of new albums released). We show that labels that have adapted to digitization are more efficient in respect of creative output, but that there is no effect of adaptation to digitization on the commercial output, which is consistent with the predictions of the long-tail hypothesis.
KeywordsRecorded music industry Digitization Long tail Innovation
JEL classificationZ11 O33 L2 D2
We thank two anonymous referees for valuable remarks and suggestions.
- Anderson, C. (2006). The Long Tail. London: Random House.Google Scholar
- Belleflamme, P., & Peitz, M. (2010). Digital piracy: Theory. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 3222.Google Scholar
- Benghozi, P. J., & Benhamou, F. (2010). The long tail: Myth or reality? International Journal of Art Management, 12, 43–53.Google Scholar
- Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y. J., & Smith, M. D. (2010). The longer tail: The changing shape of Amazon’s sales distribution curve. Working Paper. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1679991.
- Burke, A. E. (1996). The dynamics of product differentiation in the British record industry. Journal of Cultural Economics, 20, 145–164.Google Scholar
- Burnett, R. (1996). The global jukebox. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2009). Microeconometrics using stata. College Station: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
- Elberse, A., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2008). Superstars and underdogs: An examination of the long-tail phenomenon in video sales. Mimeo.Google Scholar
- Gapinski, J. H. (1984). The economics of performing Shakespeare. American Economic Review, 74(3), 458–466.Google Scholar
- Kumar, A., Smith, M. D., & Telang, R. (2011). Information discovery and the long Tail of motion picture content. Working Paper. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
- Regner, T. (2003). Innovation of music. In R. Watt (Ed.), The economics of copyright: Developments in research and analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Throsby, D. (1977). Production and cost relationships in the supply of performing arts services. In K. Tucker (Ed.), Economics of the Australian services sector. London: Groom Helm.Google Scholar
- Waldfogel, J. (2011). Copyright protection, technological change, and the quality of new products: Evidence from the recorded music since Napster. NBER Working Paper #17503.Google Scholar
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar