Advertisement

The political economy of cultural spending: evidence from Italian cities

  • Chiara Dalle NogareEmail author
  • Matteo Maria Galizzi
Original Article

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between Italian municipalities’ spending on culture in the 1990s and 2000s and a number of political variables—such as a left/right dummy, an election-year dummy and a term-limit indicator—controlling, among other things, for economic and socio-demographic characteristics of the population, the level of human capital and instruction, proxies of social capital, the extent of private financing of cultural provisions and touristic and artistic relevance. We use a panel-data regression analysis and find that, indeed, some determinants of public expenditures on culture are political. In particular, we identify an electoral cycle in which the incumbent spends less on culture in an election year. This result is robust for variations in the empirical model accounting for both the persistence and spatial interdependence of cultural expenditures by municipalities.

Keywords

Public cultural expenditure Political economy Local government 

JEL Classification

H44 H76 Z11 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Fabio Padovano and IREF for the political data; ACRI for the data on cultural spending of Fondazioni Bancarie; Paolo Buonanno for the data on social capital; Elvia Melzani and Valentina Formenti for research assistance. We are grateful to two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. We thank the participants of the 16th ACEI International Conference on Cultural Economics in Copenhagen, the XX SIEP Italian Conference on Public Economics in Pavia, and the annual research workshop at our Department for helpful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Cohen, G. D., & Roubini, N. (1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (1990). Voting on the budget deficits. American Economic Review, 80, 37–49.Google Scholar
  3. Allers, M. A., & Elhorst, J. P. (2005). Tax mimicking and yardstick competition among local governments in the Netherlands. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(4), 493–513.Google Scholar
  4. Anselin, L. (1988a). Spatial econometrics, methods and moments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Anselin, L. (1988b). Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geographical Analysis, 20, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anselin, L., Bera, A. K., Florax, R., & Yoon, M. J. (1996). Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baicker, K. (2005). The spillover effects of state spending. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 529–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumol, W. J., & Bowen, W. G. (1966). Performing arts: The economic dilemma. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
  9. Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Does political accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 769–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Besley, T., & Case, A. (2003). Political institutions and policy choices: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 7–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bille Hansen, T. (1997). The willingness-to-pay for the royal theatre in Copenhagen as a public good. Journal of Cultural Economics, 21, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bodo, C. (2006). Indagine sulla spesa pubblica per la cultura in Italia negli anni 2000, AEC (commissioned by Ministry of Culture (MiBAC)), unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  13. Bodo, C., & Bodo, S. (2007). Country profile—Italy. In Compendium of cultural policies and trends in Europe. Council of Europe, available at: www.culturalpolicies.net/web/profiles-download.php.
  14. Bodo, C., & Spada, C. (Eds.). (2004). Rapporto sull’economia della cultura in Italia 1990–2000. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  15. Bordignon, M., Cerniglia, F., & Revelli, F. (2003). In search of yardstick competition: A spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bosch, N., & Solè-Ollè, A. (2007). Yardstick competition and the political costs of raising taxes: An empirical analysis of Spanish municipalities. International Tax and Public Finance, 14, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buettner, T. (2001). Local business taxation and competition for capital: The choice of the tax rate. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31(2–3), 215–245.Google Scholar
  18. Burridge, P. (1980). On the Cliff-Ord test for spatial autocorrelation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 42, 107–108.Google Scholar
  19. Charlot, S., & Paty, S. (2007). Market access effect and local tax setting: Evidence from French panel data. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dalle Nogare, C. (1997). Ideological polarisation, coalition governments and delays in stabilisation. University of Glasgow Discussion Paper no. 9710Google Scholar
  21. Dalle Nogare, C. (2000). I governi di coalizione sono tutti “fiscally irresponsible”? Un’indagine empirica con l’utilizzo della cluster analysis, Politica Economica, I.Google Scholar
  22. Di Lascio, V., & Segre, G. (2007). Il contributo delle fondazioni di origine bancaria alla spesa delle amministrazioni locali per la cultura e i beni culturali. SIEP working paper no. 600Google Scholar
  23. Dubois, E., & Paty, S. (2010). Yardstick competition: Which neighbours matter? Annals of Regional Science, 44, 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frey, B., & Pommerehne, W. (1990). Muses and Markets. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Basil and Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Getzner, M. (2002). Determinants of public cultural expenditures: An exploratory time series analysis for Austria. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26, 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Getzner, M. (2004). Cultural policies and fiscal federalism. Public Finance and Management, 4(1), 21–50.Google Scholar
  27. Geys, B. (2006). Looking across borders: A test of spatial policy interdependence using local government efficiency ratings. Journal of Urban Economics, 60, 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Introini, L., & De Benedetto, M. (2007). Le politiche culturali nelle grandi città. In R. Grossi (Ed.), La cultura per un nuovo modello di sviluppo. Federculture e Allemandi e C., TorinoGoogle Scholar
  29. Istituto Centrale del Restauro. (1996). Carta del Rischio. Istituto Centrale del Restauro, Ministero dei Beni Culturali.Google Scholar
  30. Jeanty, P. W. (2010a). anketest: Stata module to perform diagnostic tests for spatial autocorrelation in the residuals from OLS, SAR, IV and IV-SAR models. Available from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457113.html.
  31. Jeanty, P. W. (2010b). splagvar: Stata module to generate spatially lagged variables, construct the Moran scatter plot, and calculate global Moran’s I statistics. Available from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457112.html.
  32. Jeanty, P. W. (2010c). spseudor2: Stata module to calculate goodness-of-fit measures in spatial autoregressive models. Available from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457208.html.
  33. Johnson, J. M., & Crain, W. M. (2004). Effects of term limits on fiscal performance: Evidence from democratic nations. Public Choice, 119, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis, G. B., & Rushton, M. (2007). Understanding state spending on the arts: 1976–1999. State and Local Government Review, 39(2), 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lopez, E. J. (2003). Term limits: Causes and consequences. Public Choice, 114, 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lundberg, J. (2006). Spatial interaction model of spillovers from locally provided public services. Regional Studies, 40, 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Noonan, D. S. (2007). Fiscal pressures, institutional context, and constituents: A dynamic Model of states’ arts agency appropriations. Journal of Cultural Economics, 31, 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perotti, R. (1996). Fiscal consolidation in Europe: Composition matters. American Economic Review, 86, 105–111.Google Scholar
  39. Schulze, G. G., & Rose, A. (1998). Public Orchestra funding in Germany—an empirical Investigation. Journal of Cultural Economics, 22(3), 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schulze, G. G., & Ursprung, H. W. (2000). La Donna è mobile—or is she? Voter preferences and public support for the performing arts. Public Choice, 102, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Segre, G. (2000). Fondazioni senza fondatore. Storia natura e modello di funzionamento delle fondazioni bancarie. In L. Filippini (Ed.), Economia delle fondazioni. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  42. Smart, M., & Sturm, D. M. (2006). Term limits and electoral accountability. CEP Discussion Papers no. 0770, Centre for Economic Performance, LSEGoogle Scholar
  43. Solè-Ollè, A. (2006). Expenditure spillovers and fiscal interactions: Empirical evidence from local governments in Spain. Journal of Urban Economics, 59, 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Werck, K., Heyndels, B., & Geys, B. (2008). The Impact of “Central Places” on Spatial spending patterns: Evidence from Flemish local Governments cultural expenditures. Journal of Cultural Economics, 32, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Withers, G. A. (1979). Private demand for public subsidies: An econometric study of cultural Support in Australia. Journal of Cultural Economics, 3(1), 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric panel data, 2nd edn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. 212 fondazioni: chi investe in cultura e come, in VI Yearly Report on Foundations edited by Il Giornale dell’Arte, Il Giornale dell’ArteGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze EconomicheUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations