Determinants of historic and cultural landmark designation: why we preserve what we preserve
- First Online:
- 353 Downloads
There is much interest among cultural economists in assessing the effects of heritage preservation policies. There has been less interest in modeling the policy choices made in historic and cultural landmark preservation. This article builds an economic model of a landmark designation that highlights the tensions between the interests of owners of cultural amenities and the interests of the neighboring community. We perform empirical tests by estimating a discrete choice model for landmark preservation using data from Chicago, combining the Chicago Historical Resources Survey of over 17,000 historic structures with property sales, Census, and other geographic data. The data allow us to explain why some properties were designated landmarks (or landmark districts) and others were not. The results identify the influence of property characteristics, local socio-economic factors, and measures of historic and cultural quality. The results emphasize the political economy of implementing preservation policies.
KeywordsHeritage preservation policy Landmark designation
JEL classificationZ1 R52 D78
- Ahlfeldt, G. M., & Maennig, W. (2009). Substitutability and complementarity of urban amenities: External effects of built heritage in Berlin. Real Estate Economics, 37(6) (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- City of Chicago (2004). Chicago Landmarks: General information. http://www.cityofchicago.org/Landmarks/GeneralInfo.html.
- Commission on Chicago Landmarks. (1996). Chicago historic resources survey: An inventory of architecturally and historically significant structures. Chicago: The Department.Google Scholar
- Commission on Chicago Landmarks. (2007). Landmarks ordinance with rules and regulations of the Commission on Chicago Landmarks. Chicago: City of Chicago. http://www.cityofchicago.org/Landmarks/pdf/Landmarks_Ordinance.pdf. Accessed 28 April 2008.
- Cyrenne, P., Fenton, R., & Warbanski, J. (2006). Historic buildings and rehabilitation expenditures: A panel data approach. Journal of Real Estate Research, 28(4), 349–379.Google Scholar
- Heilbrun, J., & Gray, C. M. (2001). The economics of art and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Listokin, D., & Lahr, M. L. (1997). Economic impacts of historic preservation. New Jersey: New Jersey Historic Trust.Google Scholar
- Listokin, D., Listokin, B., & Lahr, M. L. (1998). The contributions of historic preservation to housing and economic development. Housing Policy Debate, 9(3), 431–478.Google Scholar
- Mason, R. (2005). Economics and Historic Preservation: A Guide and Review of the Literature. Brookings Institution Discussion Paper, September 2005.Google Scholar
- Schuster, J. M. (2002). Making a list and checking it twice: The list as a tool of historic preservation. (Working Paper No. 14). Chicago: The Cultural Policy Center at the University of Chicago. http://culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/workingpapers/Schuster14.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2008.