Advertisement

Journal of Cultural Economics

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 91–107 | Cite as

Creativity and Life Cycles of Artists

  • Victor Ginsburgh
  • Sheila Weyers
Original Article

Abstract

Age curves, which relate age to creativity or exceptional achievements, seem to take two forms: some artists bloom early (Picasso), others later in life (Cézanne). We argue that this objective fact is not related to their mode of creation according to which some artists proceed by drawings made prior to the painting's execution, while others are more likely to imitate and achieve this through color and the process of painting itself.

Keywords

Age curves disegno and colore Modes of artistic creation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baxandall, M. (1985). Patterns of Intention. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  2. Burke, P. (1986). The Italian Renaissance. Culture and Society in Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  3. Chastel, A. (2000). Fables, formes et figures. Flammarion, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. De Piles, R. (1673). Dialogue sur le coloris. Paris.Google Scholar
  5. De Piles, R. (1708). Cours de peinture par principes. Gallimard, Paris, 1989 (Ed. J. Thuillier).Google Scholar
  6. De Piles, R. (1715). Abrégé de la vie des peintres, avec des réflexions sur leurs ouvrages, et un traité du peintre parfait, de la connaissance des dessins, et de l'utilité des estampes, 2nd edn. Paris.Google Scholar
  7. Ekelund, R. (2002). “David W. Galenson, Painting Outside the Lines: Patterns of Creativity in Modern Art, Book Review.” Journal of Cultural Economics 26, 325–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Félibien, A. (1666–1686). Entretiens sur les vies et les ouvrages des plus excellens peintres anciens et modernes. Gregg Press, Farnborough, 1967 (Ed. Sir A. Blunt).Google Scholar
  9. Félibien, A. (1681). Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire des maisons royales. Paris.Google Scholar
  10. Fiedler, K. (1971). Schriften zur Kunst. G. Böhm, München.Google Scholar
  11. Galenson, D. (1999). The lives of the painters of modern life: The careers of artists in France from Impressionism to Cubism. NBER Working Paper no. 6888, January.Google Scholar
  12. Galenson, D. (2000). “The careers of modern artists. Evidence from auctions of contemporary art.” Journal of Cultural Economics 24, 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galenson, D. (2001). Painting Outside the Lines: Patterns of Creativity in Modern Art. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Galenson, D. (2002a). “Measuring masters and masterpieces. French ranking of French painters and paintings from Realism to Surrealism.” Histoire et Mesure XVII, 47–85.Google Scholar
  15. Galenson, D. (2002b). “Quantifying artistic success. Ranking French painters–and paintings–from Impressionism to Cubism.” Historical Methods 35, 5–19.Google Scholar
  16. Galenson, D. (2003). The life cycles of modern artists. Theory, measurement, and implications. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  17. Galenson, D. and Jensen, R. (2001). Young geniuses and Old Masters: The life cycles of great artists from Masaccio to Jasper Johns. NBER Working Paper 6368, July.Google Scholar
  18. Galenson, D. and Weinberg, B. (2000). “Age and the quality of work: The case of Modern American painters.” Journal of Political Economy 108, 761–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galenson, D. and Weinberg, B. (2001). “Creating modern art: The changing careers of painters in France from Impressionism to Cubism.” American Economic Review 91, 1063–1071.Google Scholar
  20. Genette, G. (1994). L’oeuvre de l’art. Immanence et transcendance. Le Seuil, Paris.Google Scholar
  21. Ginsburgh, V. and Weyers, S. (2005). “On the contemporaneousness of Roger de Piles’ Balance des Peintres.” In J. Amariglio, S. Cullenberg and J. Childers (Eds.), The Aesthetics of Value. Routledge, London, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  22. Gombrich, E. (1959). Art and Illusion, 5th edn. Phaidon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Guiraud, J. (1986). “Etudes sur Mondrian. Les facteurs photochromatiques.” La Part de l’Oeil 2, 33–66.Google Scholar
  24. Holty, C. (1957). “Mondrian in New York: a memoir.” Arts 31, 21.Google Scholar
  25. Hughes, A. (1996). “Michelangelo (Buonarroti).” In J. Turner (Ed.), The Dictionary of Art. vol. 21. Grove, New York, pp. 431–450.Google Scholar
  26. Junod, P. (1976). Transparence et opacité. Editions L’Age d'Homme, Lausanne.Google Scholar
  27. Junod, P. (1996). “Critique d’art.” In M. Laclotte et J.-P. Cuzin (Eds.), Dictionnaíre de la peinture. Larousse, Paris.Google Scholar
  28. Kahnweiler, D. (1963). Confessions esthétiques. Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
  29. Newman, G. (1996). “Color.” In J. Turner (Ed.), The Dictionary of Art. vol. 7. Grove, New York, pp. 626–631.Google Scholar
  30. Pace, C. (1996). “Disegno e colore.” In J. Turner (Ed.), The Dictionary of Art. vol. 9. Grove, New York, pp. 6–9.Google Scholar
  31. Panofsky, E. (1989). Idea. Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
  32. Puttfarken, T. (1985). Roger de Piles’ Theory of Art. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  33. Rosenberg, J. (1967). On Quality in Art. Phaidon Press Ltd, London.Google Scholar
  34. Rouchette, J. (1959). La Renaissance que nous a léguée Vasari. Les Belles Lettres, Paris.Google Scholar
  35. Sandler, I. (1988). American Art in the 1960s. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Schulz, J. (1975). “Michelangelo’s unfinished works.” The Art Bulletin LVII, 366–373.Google Scholar
  37. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Simonton, D. (1975). “Age and literary creativity: A cross-cultural and transhistorical survey.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 6, 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simonton, D. (1988). “Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research?” Psychological Bulletin 104, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simonton, D. (1991). “Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts.” Development Psychology 27, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simonton, D. (2005). The creative process in Picassos’ Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements versus nonmonotonic variants. Manuscript, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
  42. Teyssèdre, B. (1964). L'histoire de l'art vue du grand siècle. Julliard, Paris.Google Scholar
  43. Turner, J. (Ed.). (1996). The Dictionary of Art. Grove, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Vasari, G. (1578). Les vies des meilleurs peinteurs, sculpteurs et architectes. Berger Levrault, Paris, 1981 (Ed. A. Chastel).Google Scholar
  45. Wheeler, D. (1991). Art since mid-century 1945 to the Present. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor Ginsburgh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sheila Weyers
    • 3
  1. 1.ECARESUniversité libre de Bruxelles BrusselsBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.COREUniversité catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  3. 3.Université catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations