Journal of Cultural Economics

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 59–78 | Cite as

Expert Judgment Versus Public Opinion – Evidence from the Eurovision Song Contest

  • Marco A. HaanEmail author
  • S. Gerhard Dijkstra
  • Peter T. Dijkstra


For centuries, there have been discussions as to whether only experts can judge the quality of cultural output, or whether the taste of the public also has merit. This paper tries to answer that question empirically, using national finals of the Eurovision Song Contest. We show that experts are better judges of quality in the sense that the outcome of finals judged by experts is less sensitive to factors unrelated to quality than the outcome of finals judged by public opinion. Yet, experts are not perfect; their judgment does still depend on such factors. This is also the case in the European finals of the contest.

Key words

Eurovision Song Contest expert judgment public opinion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Courneya, K.S. and Carron, A.V. (1991) “Effects of Travel and Length of Home Stand/Road Trip on the Home Advantage.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 13(1): 42–49.Google Scholar
  2. Cowen, T. (1998) In Praise of Commercial Culture, Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
  3. ebu/uer. (2001) Rules of the Eurovision Song Contest 2002, ebu/uer, Geneva,
  4. Eilers, A. (2002) Eurovision Song Contest Record Covers,
  5. Eeuwes, G. (2002),
  6. Glejser, H. and Heyndels, B. (2001) “Efficiency and Inefficiency in the Ranking in Competitions: The Case of the Queen Elisabeth Music Contest.” Journal of Cultural Economics 25: 109-129.Google Scholar
  7. Ginsburgh, V. (2003) “Awards, Success and Aesthetic Quality in the Arts.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(2): 99–111.Google Scholar
  8. Ginsburgh, V.A. and van Ours, J.C. (2003) “Expert Opinion and Compensation: Evidence from a Musical Competition.” American Economic Review 93: 289–296.Google Scholar
  9. Ginsburgh, V. and Weyers, S. (1999) “On the Perceived Quality of Movies.” Journal of Cultural Economics 23: 269–283.Google Scholar
  10. Holbrook, M.B. (1999) “Popular Appeal versus Expert Judgments of Motion Pictures.” Journal of Consumer Research 26: 144–155.Google Scholar
  11. Lipsitz, G. (1999) “T. Cowen, In Praise of Commercial Culture, Book Review.” Journal of Economic Literature 37: 1741–1742.Google Scholar
  12. Musgrave, R.A. (1959) The Theory of Public Finance. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Ramsey. (1969) “Tests for Specification Errors in Classical Linear Least Squares Analysis.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 31: 350–371.Google Scholar
  14. Schwarm-Bronson, N. (2001) Eurovision Song Contest: the Story, ebu/uer, Geneva,
  15. Schwartz, B. and Barsky, S.F. (1977) “The Home Advantage.” Social Forces 55: 641–661.Google Scholar
  16. Stewart, J.M., O’Shea, E., Donaldson, C. and Shackley, P. (2002) “Do ordering effects matter in willingness-to-pay studies of health care?.” Journal of Health Economics 21: 585–599.Google Scholar
  17. Stoddart, C. (2002), Eurovision Song Contest National Finals Homepage,
  18. Vergin, R.C. and Sosik, J.J. (1999) “No Place Like Home: An Examination of the Home Field Advantage in Gambling Strategies in NFL Football.” Journal of Economics and Business 51: 21–31.Google Scholar
  19. Walraven, H. and Willems, G. (2000) Dinge-dong – Het Eurovisie Songfestival in de twinstigste eeuw, Forum, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  20. Wijnberg, N.M. (1995) “Selection Processes and Appropriability in Art, Science, and Technology.” Journal of Cultural Economics 19(3): 221–235.Google Scholar
  21. Wijnberg, N.M. and Gemser, G. (2000), “Adding Value to Innovation: Impressionism and the transformation of the Selection System in Visual Arts.” Organization Science 11(3): 323–329.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco A. Haan
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Gerhard Dijkstra
    • 1
  • Peter T. Dijkstra
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations