Journal of Cultural Economics

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 325–334 | Cite as

Are There Too Many Revivals on Broadway? A Stochastic Dominance Approach

Short Paper

Abstract

According to many theater critics not only does Broadway produce too many revivals but there is an increasing tendency to produce revivals in preference to original shows. Nonparametric techniques are used to test for a trend in the proportion of new shows accounted for by revivals. These tests indicate that the proportion of revivals is indeed increasing over time. Using nonparametric techniques again to test for stochastic dominance it is difficult to argue that Broadway produces too many revivals. Although original productions on average run for longer, revivals are much less likely to close after only a small number of performances.

Key Words

Broadway theater stochastic dominance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, B. (1995) “Who Killed Broadway?” Urbanities 5: 101–107.Google Scholar
  2. Baumol, W. and Bowen, W. (1966) Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma. Twentieth Century Fund, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop, J., Formby, J. and Smith, W. (1991) “Lorenz Dominance and Welfare: Changes in the US Distribution of Income, 1967–1986.” Review of Economics and Statistics 73: 134–139.Google Scholar
  4. Cuzick, J. (1985) “A Wilcoxon-Type Test for Trend.” Statistics in Medicine 4: 87–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Davidson, R. and Duclos, J. (2000) “Statistical Inference for Stochastic Dominance and the Measurement of Poverty and Inequality.” Econometrica 68: 1453–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Vany, A. and Lee, C. (2001) “Quality Signals in Information Cascades and the Dynamics of the Distribution of Motion Picture Box Office Revenues.” Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control 25: 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Vany, A. and Walls, W. (2002) “Does Hollywood Make Too Many R-Rated Movies? Risk, Stochastic Dominance, and the Illusion of Expectation.” Journal of Business 75: 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang, C. and Litzenberger, R. (1988) Foundations for Financial Economics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  9. League of American Theaters and Producers (2002) Broadway's Economic Contribution to New York City 2001. League of American Theaters and Producers, New York.Google Scholar
  10. League of American Theaters and Producers (2003) Who Goes to Broadway? The Demographics of the Audience 2001–2002. League of American Theaters and Producers, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Loney, G. (1995) “Survival Strategies in New York Theaters.” New Theater Quarterly 11: 79.Google Scholar
  12. Maddison, D. (2004) “Increasing Returns to Information and the Survival of Broadway Theater Productions.” Applied Economics Letters 11: 639–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McNamara, B. (2001) “Broadway: A Theater Historian's Perspective.” The Drama Review 45: 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pope, R. and Ziemer, R. (1984) “Stochastic Efficiency Normality and Sampling Errors in Agricultural Risk Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 31–40.Google Scholar
  15. Reddy, S., Swaminathan, V. and Motley, C. (1998) “Exploring the Determinants of Broadway Show Success.” Journal of Marketing Research 35: 370–383.Google Scholar
  16. Simonoff, J. and Ma, L. (2003) “An Empirical Study of Factors Relating to the Success of Broadway Shows.” Journal of Business 76: 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sponberg, A. (1991) Broadway Talks: What Professionals Think About Commercial Theater in America. Greenwood, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Tse, Y. and Zhang, X. (2003) A Monte Carlo Investigation of Some Tests for Stochastic Dominance. Mimeo. Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity College LondonLondon

Personalised recommendations