Developing a Tool for Evaluating Ageism in Nursing Care of Older People in Kashan/Iran
Ageism implies negative views and attitudes towards older people. These unconscious behaviors could make the elderly feel as if they were no longer useful for the family and community. Ageism is common in healthcare services. The objective of this study was to develop a tool to assess ageism in nursing care in Kashan/Iran 2015. This psychometric study was carried out in four stages: literature review for item generation; content validity testing; exploratory factor analysis (EFA) for evaluation of construct validity; and reliability assessment. The data analyzed with SPSS version 16. The final questionnaire had 24 items. The total CVI and CVR were 0.88 and 0.57. Explanatory factor analysis identified 3 factors of respecting older adult in nursing care (14 items); age discrimination and negative views towards older adults (5 items); attention to older adult and their basic caring needs (5 items). The three factors could explain 49.54% of variance. The test-re-test correlation stood at 0.9. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was Cronbach’s alpha =0.85. A valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of ageism in nursing care was developed in this study.
KeywordsAgeism Nursing care Validity and reliability Factor analysis
We are grateful to all the experts who shared their comments and views with us, and the nurses who participated in this study. The authors acknowledge the research deputy of Kashan University of Medical Sciences for funding and supporting this research with the grant number 94038.
This study was funded and supported by deputy of research in Kashan University of Medical Sciences with grant number 94038.
Negin Masoudi Alavi has received research grants from Kashan University of Medical Sciences. Parvin Ahmadi was a master degree student in geriatric nursing in Kashan University of Medical Sciences. Dr. Hamidreza Gilasi, Azadeh Safa, and Mohammad Aghajani are faculty members in Kashan University of Medical Sciences who participated in this research project.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The ethical committee of the Kashan University of Medical Sciences approved the study protocol with the code number: IR.KAUMS.REC.1394.38.
Participants were informed about the aims of the study before they signed the consent form. In all stages of the study the anonymity of the participants was respected. The study protocol was based on Helsinki Declaration of Ethics in Research.
- Askarizade-Mahani, M., Arab, M., Mohmdalyzdah, S., & Haghdost, A. (2008). Staff nurses knowledge of aging process and their attitudes toward elder people. Iranian Journal of Nursing, 55, 27–19.Google Scholar
- Bowling, A. (2007). Honour your father and mother: Ageism in medicine. British Journal of General Practice, 538, 347–348.Google Scholar
- Cary, L. A., Chasteen, A. L., & Remedios, J. (2017). The ambivalent ageism scale: Developing and validating a scale to measure benevolent and hostile ageism. Gerontologist, 2, e27–e36.Google Scholar
- Centre for Policy on Ageing. (2009). Ageism and age discrimination in secondary health care in the United Kingdom. London: CPA publishing Available from: http://www.cpa.org.uk/reviews. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.
- Fukata, S., Ando, M., Amemiya, T., Kuroiwa, K., & Oda, K. (2012). Postoperative function following radical surgery in gastric and colorectal cancer patients over 80 years of age-an objection to "ageism". Nagoya Journal of Medical Science, 3-4, 241–251.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, G. (2012). Basic geriatric nursing (pp. 18–19). St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
- Rosencranz, H.A., & McNevin, T.E. (1969). A factor analysis of attitudes toward the aged. The Gerontologist, 9, 55-59.Google Scholar