Skip to main content
Log in

Intergenerational Living Arrangements in Myanmar and Thailand: A Comparative Analysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study compares living arrangements and related intergenerational support in Myanmar and Thailand based on recent national surveys of older persons in both countries and prior surveys in Thailand. The countries share relatively similar cultural contexts but differ radically in economic development. Substantially higher percentages of older persons in Myanmar currently coreside with their children and are considerably more likely to have non-coresident children living in the same locality. They are also less likely to live with a spouse and to have children living at a substantial distance. Older persons in Myanmar are much less likely to have phone contact with children living away and less likely to receive visits. Thai elders are considerably more likely to provide custodial care to grandchildren with absent parents and to live in skip generation households. Older Thais are also considerably more likely to receive substantial remittances from non-coresident children. The living arrangements of older age Thais in the past, however, more closely resembles the current situation in Myanmar. It appears that current differences are largely attributable to the more advanced Thai economic development through its associated impacts on migration, fertility and mortality. Contrasting political situations and government priorities also likely play a role. The results provide insights into the implications of development for older persons and suggest that if the recent course of political transformation and opening to the global economy continues in Myanmar, living arrangements there may well follow the trends in Thailand over past decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Regions are ethnically predominantly Burman while states are ethnic minority dominant. In addition there is a union territory consisting of the capital area, one so-called self-administered division and 5 self-administered zones. Myanmar also has an administrative division which is translated as ‘district’ of which there are 63 and in this sense is similar to a province in Thailand but the Myanmar survey does not include information about the district of residence for either respondents or their children.

  2. Although grandchildren with absent parents also include those whose parents are deceased, the large majority are cases whose parents migrated and live elsewhere.

References

  • Aboderin, I. (2004). Modernisation and ageing theory revisited: current explanations of recent developing world and historical western shifts in material family support for older people. Ageing and Society, 24, 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arber, S., & Timonen, V. (2012). Contemporary grandparenting: Changing family relationships in global contexts (pp. 51–70). Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Asis, M. M. B., Domingo, L., Knodel, J., & Mehta, K. (1995). Living arrangements in four Asian countries: a comparative perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 10, 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A., Bell, M., & Charles-Edwards, E. (2014). Life-course transitions and the age profile of internal migration. Population and Development Review, 40(2), 213–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chayovan, N., & Knodel, J. (1997). A report of the survey of the welfare of the elderly in Thailand, IPS Publication 248/97. Bangkok: Institute of Population Studies, Chulalongkorn University, March 1997.

  • Chayovan, N., Wongsith, M., & Saengtienchai, C. (1988). Socio-economic consequences of the ageing of the population in Thailand: Survey findings. Bangkok: Institute of Population Studies, Chulalongkorn University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croll, E. (2006). The intergenerational contract in the changing Asian family. Oxford Development Studies, 34(4), 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Population. (2014). The population and housing census of Myanmar, 2014: Summary of the provisional results. Yangon: UNFPA and Ministry of Population and Immigration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmajert, P., & Izuhara, M. (2010). Spiritual debts and gendered costs, chapter 7. In M. Izuhara (Ed.), Ageing and international relations: Family reciprocity from a global perspective. Portland: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, T. (2013). Antiquated trades endangered in a rapidly changing Myanmar. New York Times, November 19, 2013.

  • Hashimoto, A. (1991). Living arrangements of the aged in seven developing countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 6(4), 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HelpAge. (2013). Introduction to social protection benefits for old age. Yangon: HelpAge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, J., & Yoon, H. (2006). The sweep of age and aging: Changing mores, changing policies. In J. Hendricks & H. Yoon (Eds.), Handbook of Asian aging (pp. 1–22). Amityville: Baywood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, A. (2003). Theoretical perspectives, measurement issues, and related research. In A. Hermalin (Ed.), The well-being of the elderly in Asia: A four-country comparative study (pp. 101–141). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, C., & Loi, V. M. (1996). Family and household structure in Vietnam: glimpses from a recent survey. Pacific Affairs, 69, 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2013). World Economic Outlook Database, April 2013.

  • International Organization for Migration (IOM) and Asian Research Center for Migration (ARCM), Chulalongkorn University. (2013). Assessing potential changes in the migration patterns of Myanmar migrants and their impact on Thailand. Bangkok: IOM Country Mission in Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J. (2012). The situation of older persons in Myanmar. Yangon: HelpAge International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J. (2014). The situation of older persons in Myanmar—an overview. BOLD, 24(3), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J., & Saengtienchai, C. (1999). Studying living arrangements of the elderly: lessons from a quasi qualitative case study approach in Thailand. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 14(3), 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J., Saengtienchai, C., & Sittitrai, W. (1995). The living arrangements of elderly in Thailand: views of the populace. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 10, 79–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J., Kespichayawattana, J., Wiwatwanich, S., & Saengtienchai, C. (2010). How left behind are rural parents of migrant children: evidence from Thailand. Ageing and Society, 30(5), 811–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J., Prachuabmoh, V., & Chayovan, N. (2013). The changing well-being of Thai elderly: An update from the 2011 survey of older persons in Thailand. Chiang Mai: HelpAge International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwak, E. (1960). Geographic-mobility and extended family cohesion. American Sociological Review, 25(3), 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litwak, E., & Kulis, S. (1987). Technology, proximity, and measures of kin support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(3), 649–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O. (1992). Family change and support of the elderly in Asia: what do we know? Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 7(3), 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Statistical Office (NSO) (2003). Report on the 2002 Survey of Older Persons in Thailand. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.

  • National Statistical Office (NSO) (2008). Report on the 2007 Survey of the Older Persons in Thailand. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.

  • National Statistical Office (NSO) (2013). Report on the 2011 Survey of the Older Persons in Thailand. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.

  • National Statistical Office (NSO). No date. Report of the 1994 Survey of Elderly in Thailand. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.

  • Park, C.-Y., Khan, M. E., & Vandenberg, P. (2012). Myanmar in transition: Opportunities and challenges. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risso-Gill, I., McKee, M., Coker, R., Plot, P., & Legido-Quigley, H. (2013). Health system strengthening in Myanmar during political reforms: perspectives from international agencies. Health Policy and Planning, 29, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. C. (1998). Residential separation and patterns of interaction between elderly parents and their adult children. Progress in Human Geography, 22(3), 368–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoorenberg, T. (2013). Demographic changes in Myanmar since 1983: an examination of official data. Population and Development Review, 39, 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J. (2013). Chinese older adults taking care of grandchildren: practices and policies for productive aging. Ageing International, 38, 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suwanrada, W. (2012). Old-age allowance system in Thailand. 2013 Poverty in Focus 25:14–16.

  • Timonen, V., & Arber, S. (2012). A new look at grandparenting. Chapter 1. In S. Arber & V. Timonen (Eds.), Contemporary grandparenting: Changing family relationships and global contexts (pp. 1–24). Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tout, K. (1989). Ageing in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treas, J., & Logue, B. (1986). Economic development and the older population. Population and Development Review, 12(4), 645–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCAP (2004). Population ageing, focus of regional seminar in Macau. Population Headliners No. 302, p1.

  • United Nations (UN) (2002). Report of the second world assembly on aging: Madrid, 8–12 April 2002. Document A/CONF.197/9. New York: United Nations.

  • United Nations (UN). (2005). Living arrangements of older persons around the world. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (2013). World population prospects: The 2012 revision. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2014). Kachin State. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kachin_State. Accessed 31 Aug 2014.

  • Wilson, G. (2007). Globalisation and support in old age. Education and Ageing, 16(2), 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • World NGO Forum on Ageing (2002). Final declaration and recommendations of the world and GOP forum on aging. Global Action on Aging at www.globalaging.org.

  • Zimmer, Z., & Kim, S. K. (2001). Living arrangements and socio-demographic conditions of older adults in Cambodia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 16, 353–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Henry Luce Foundation through the Mekong Region Development Research Group at the University of Utah and by the Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund of Chulalongkorn University (Grant no. RES560530174-AS). We would also like to thank Ms. Khin Mo Wai for her assistance in translating Burmese language material.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Knodel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knodel, J., Pothisiri, W. Intergenerational Living Arrangements in Myanmar and Thailand: A Comparative Analysis. J Cross Cult Gerontol 30, 1–20 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-014-9254-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-014-9254-5

Keywords

Navigation