Atomistic insight into sequence-directed DNA bending and minicircle formation propensity in the absence and presence of phased A-tracts
Bending of double-stranded (ds) DNA plays a crucial role in many important biological processes and is relevant for nanotechnological applications. Among all the elements that have been studied in relation to dsDNA bending, A-tracts stand out as one of the most controversial. The “ApA wedge” theory was disproved when a series of linear polynucleotides containing phased 5′-A4T4-3′ or 5′-T4A4-3′ runs were shown to be bent or straight, respectively, and crystallographic evidence revealed that A-tracts are unbent. Furthermore, some of the smallest dsDNA minicircles described to date (~ 100 bp in size) lack A-tracts and are subjected to varying levels of torsional stress. Representative DNA sequences from this experimental background were modeled in atomic detail and their dynamic behavior was simulated over hundreds of nanoseconds using the AMBER force field ParmBSC1. Subsequent analysis of the resulting trajectories allowed us to (i) unambiguously establish the location of the bends in all cases; (ii) identify the structural elements that are directly responsible for the macroscopically detected curvature; and (iii) reveal the importance not only of coherently summing the effects of the bending elements when they are in synchrony with the natural repeat of the helix (i.e. separated by an integral number of helical turns) but also when alternated with a half-integral separation of opposite effects. We conclude that the major determinant of the macroscopically observed bending is the proper grouping and phasing of the positive roll imposed by pyrimidine-purine (YR) steps and the negative or null roll characteristic of RY steps and A-tracts, respectively. This conclusion is in very good agreement with the structural parameters experimentally derived for much smaller DNA molecules either alone or as found in DNA–protein complexes. We expect that this work will pave the way for future studies on drug-induced DNA bending, DNA shape readout by transcription factors, structure of circular extrachromosomal DNA, and custom design of curved DNA origami scaffolds.
KeywordsDNA structure Molecular dynamics simulations Circular DNA
A.M. gratefully acknowledges being the recipient of a predoctoral fellowship from the University of Alcalá. We are indebted to Jason Swails for help provided in the AMBER reflector regarding circular DNA molecules, Jürgen Walther for assistance at the MCDNA server, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions. We thankfully acknowledge the GPU time granted on Minotauro (BCV-2019-2-0016) and the technical support provided by staff at the Barcelona Supercomputing Center.
Financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (SAF2015-64629-C2-2-R) and PharmaMar S.A.U. (Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain) is gratefully acknowledged.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
- 5.Pasi M, Maddocks JH, Beveridge D, Bishop TC, Case DA, Cheatham T, Dans PD, Jayaram B, Lankas F, Laughton C, Mitchell J, Osman R, Orozco M, Perez A, Petkeviciute D, Spackova N, Sponer J, Zakrzewska K, Lavery R (2014) μABC: a systematic microsecond molecular dynamics study of tetranucleotide sequence effects in B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 42(19):12272–12283. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku855 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, Joshi R, Honig B, Mann RS (2010) Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem 79:233–269. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060408-091030 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.McAteer K, Aceves-Gaona A, Michalczyk R, Buchko GW, Isern NG, Silks LA, Miller JH, Kennedy MA (2004) Compensating bends in a 16-base-pair DNA oligomer containing a T3A3 segment: a NMR study of global DNA curvature. Biopolymers 75(6):497–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.20168 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Beveridge DL, Barreiro G, Byun KS, Case DA, Cheatham TE, 3rd, Dixit SB, Giudice E, Lankas F, Lavery R, Maddocks JH, Osman R, Seibert E, Sklenar H, Stoll G, Thayer KM, Varnai P, Young MA (2004) Molecular dynamics simulations of the 136 unique tetranucleotide sequences of DNA oligonucleotides. I. Research design and results on d(CpG) steps. Biophys J 87(6):3799–3813. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.045252 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 32.Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA (1995) A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 117(19):5179–5197. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00124a002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Wang J, Cieplak P, Kollman PA (2000) How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? J Comput Chem 21(12):1049–1074. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-987X(200009)21:12%3c1049:AID-JCC3%3e3.0.CO;2-F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Pérez A, Marchan I, Svozil D, Sponer J, Cheatham TE, 3rd, Laughton CA, Orozco M (2007) Refinement of the AMBER force field for nucleic acids: improving the description of α/γ conformers. Biophys J 92(11):3817–3829. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.097782 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Ivani I, Dans PD, Noy A, Perez A, Faustino I, Hospital A, Walther J, Andrio P, Goni R, Balaceanu A, Portella G, Battistini F, Gelpi JL, Gonzalez C, Vendruscolo M, Laughton CA, Harris SA, Case DA, Orozco M (2016) Parmbsc1: a refined force field for DNA simulations. Nat Methods 13(1):55–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3658 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Macke T, Case DA (1998) Modeling unusual nucleic acid structures. In: Santa-Lucia J (ed) Leontes NB, J. Molecular s. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 379–393Google Scholar
- 42.Case DA, Ben-Shalom IY, Brozell SR, Cerutti DS, Cheatham TE, Cruzeiro VWD, Darden TA, Duke RE, Ghoreishi D, Gilson MK, Gohlke H, Goetz AW, Greene D, Harris R, Homeyer N, Izadi S, Kovalenko A, Kurtzman T, Lee TS, LeGrand S, Li P, Lin C, Liu J, Luchko T, Luo R, Mermelstein DJ, Merz KM, Miao Y, Monard G, Nguyen C, Nguyen H, Omelyan I, Onufriev A, Pan F, Qi R, Roe DR, Roitberg A, Sagui C, Schott-Verdugo S, Shen J, Simmerling CL, Smith J, Salomon-Ferrer R, Swails J, Walker RC, Wang J, Wei H, Wolf RM, Wu X, Xiao L, York DM, Kollman PA (2018) AmberTools18, 18th edn. UCSF, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 47.DeLano WL (2015) The PyMOL molecular graphics system. 126.96.36.199. edn. Schrödinger, LLCGoogle Scholar
- 51.Wu S, Turner KM, Nguyen N, Raviram R, Erb M, Santini J, Luebeck J, Rajkumar U, Diao Y, Li B, Zhang W, Jameson N, Corces MR, Granja JM, Chen X, Coruh C, Abnousi A, Houston J, Ye Z, Hu R, Yu M, Kim H, Law JA, Verhaak RGW, Hu M, Furnari FB, Chang HY, Ren B, Bafna V, Mischel PS (2019) Circular ecDNA promotes accessible chromatin and high oncogene expression. Nature 575(7784):699–703. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1763-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar