Energetic basis for drug resistance of HIV-1 protease mutants against amprenavir
- 430 Downloads
Amprenavir (APV) is a high affinity (0.15 nM) HIV-1 protease (PR) inhibitor. However, the affinities of the drug resistant protease variants V32I, I50V, I54V, I54M, I84V and L90M to amprenavir are decreased 3 to 30-fold compared to the wild-type. In this work, the popular molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area method has been used to investigate the effectiveness of amprenavir against the wild-type and these mutated protease variants. Our results reveal that the protonation state of Asp25/Asp25′ strongly affects the dynamics, the overall affinity and the interactions of the inhibitor with individual residues. We emphasize that, in contrast to what is often assumed, the protonation state may not be inferred from the affinities but requires pKa calculations. At neutral pH, Asp25 and Asp25′ are ionized or protonated, respectively, as suggested from pKa calculations. This protonation state was thus mainly considered in our study. Mutation induced changes in binding affinities are in agreement with the experimental findings. The decomposition of the binding free energy reveals the mechanisms underlying binding and drug resistance. Drug resistance arises from an increase in the energetic contribution from the van der Waals interactions between APV and PR (V32I, I50V, and I84V mutant) or a rise in the energetic contribution from the electrostatic interactions between the inhibitor and its target (I54M and I54V mutant). For the V32I mutant, also an increased free energy for the polar solvation contributes to the drug resistance. For the L90M mutant, a rise in the van der Waals energy for APV-PR interactions is compensated by a decrease in the polar solvation free energy such that the net binding affinity remains unchanged. Detailed understanding of the molecular forces governing binding and drug resistance might assist in the design of new inhibitors against HIV-1 PR variants that are resistant against current drugs.
KeywordsHIV-1 PR Drug resistance Amprenavir MM-PBSA Normal mode analysis
The work was supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany. The authors thank Reinhard Lipowsky for support. P. K. is thankful to Dr. Siegfried Höfinger, University of Bologna, Italy for discussion.
- 1.Darke PL, Leu CT, Davis LJ, Heimbach JC, Diehl RE, Hill WS, Dixon RA, Sigal IS (1989) Human immunodeficiency virus protease. Bacterial expression and characterization of the purified aspartic protease. J Biol Chem 264:2307–2312Google Scholar
- 3.Mous J, Heimer EP, Le Grice SJJ (1988) Processing protease and reverse transcriptase from human immunodeficiency virus type I polyprotein in Escherichia coli. J Virol 62:1433–1436Google Scholar
- 9.Shafer RW, Schapiro JM (2008) HIV-1 drug resistance mutations: an updated framework for the second decade of HAART. AIDS Rev 10:67–84Google Scholar
- 10.Vergne L, Peeters M, Mpoudi-Ngole E, Bourgeois A, Liegeois F, Toure-Kane C, Mboup S, Mulanga-Kabeya C, Saman E, Jourdan J, Reynes J, Delaporte E (2000) Genetic diversity of protease and reverse transcriptase sequences in non-subtype-B human immunodeficiency virus type 1 strains: evidence of many minor drug resistance mutations in treatment-naive patients. J Clin Microbiol 38:3919–3925Google Scholar
- 18.Yamazaki T, Nicholson LK, Wingfield P, Stahl SJ, Kaufman JD, Eyermann CJ, Hodge CN, Lam PYS, Torchia DA (1994) NMR and X-ray evidence that the HIV protease catalytic aspartyl groups are protonated in the complex formed by the protease and a non-peptide cyclic urea-based inhibitor. J Am Chem Soc 116:10791–10792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Clavel F, Hance AJ (2004) HIV drug resistance. New Engl J Med 350:1023–1035Google Scholar
- 23.Johnson VA, Brun-Vezinet F, Clotet B, Gunthard HF, Kuritzkes DR, Pillay D, Schapiro JM, Richman DD (2008) Update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1. Top HIV Med 16:138–145Google Scholar
- 28.Vorobjev YN, Almagro JC, Hermans J (1998) Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model. Proteins 32:399–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Kollman PA, Massova I, Reyes C, Kuhn B, Huo S, Chong L, Lee M, Lee T, Duan Y, Wang W, Donini O, Cieplak P, Srinivasan J, Case DA, Cheatham TE (2000) Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc Chem Res 33:889–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Rastelli G, Rio AD, Degliesposti G, Sgobba M (2010) Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA. J. Comput. Chem. 31:797–810Google Scholar
- 63.Adachi M, Ohhara T, Kurihara K, Tamada T, Honjo E, Okazaki N, Arai S, Shoyama Y, Kimura K, Maatsumura H, Sugiyama S, Adachi H, Takano K, Mori Y, Hidaka K, Kimura T, Hayashi Y, Kiso Y, Kuroki R (2009) Structure of HIV-1 protease in complex with potent inhibitor KNI-272 determined by high-resolution X-ray and neutron crystallography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4641–4646CrossRefGoogle Scholar