Towards a rational spacer design for bivalent inhibition of estrogen receptor
- 191 Downloads
Estrogen receptors are known drug targets that have been linked to several kinds of cancer. The structure of the estrogen receptor ligand binding domain is available and reveals a homodimeric layout. In order to improve the binding affinity of known estrogen receptor inhibitors, bivalent compounds have been developed that consist of two individual ligands linked by flexible tethers serving as spacers. So far, binding affinities of the bivalent compounds do not surpass their monovalent counterparts. In this article, we focus our attention on the molecular spacers that are used to connect the individual ligands to form bivalent compounds, and describe their thermodynamic contribution during the ligand binding process. We use computational methods to predict structural and entropic parameters of different spacer structures. We find that flexible spacers introduce a number of effects that may interfere with ligand binding and possibly can be connected to the low binding affinities that have been reported in binding assays. Based on these findings, we try to provide guidelines for the design of novel molecular spacers.
KeywordsEstrogen receptor Bivalent ligand Spacer Multivalency Entropy
Support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 765) is gratefully acknowledged.
- 1.Avendano C, Menendez JC (2008) Medicinal chemistry of anticancer drugs. Elsevier B.V., AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 5.Brzozowski AM, Pike ACW, Dauter Z, Hubbard RE, Bonn T, Engstroem O, Oehman L, Greene GL, Gustafsson J, Carlquis M (1997) Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor. Nature 389:753–758Google Scholar
- 7.Case D, III, TEC, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Jr., KMM, Onufriev A, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods R (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26:1668–1688Google Scholar
- 8.Dai SY, Chalmers MJ, Bruning J, Bramlett KS, Osborne HE, Montrose-Rafizadeh C, Barr RJ, Wang Y, Wang M, Burris TP, Dodge JA, Griffin PR (2008) Prediction of the tissue-specificity of selective estrogen receptor modulators by using a single biochemical method. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(20):7171–7176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Klimm M, Bujotzek A, Weber M (2010) Direct reweighting strategies in conformation dynamics. MATCH Commun Math Comput Chem 65(2) (in press)Google Scholar
- 27.Schmidt-Ehrenberg J, Baum D, Hege HC (2002) Visualizing dynamic molecular conformations. In: Proceedings of IEEE visualization 2002. IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 235–242Google Scholar
- 32.Weber M, Andrae K (2010) A simple method for the estimation of entropy differences. MATCH Commun Math Comput Chem 63(2):319–332Google Scholar