Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 203–211 | Cite as

Applying forces to elastic network models of large biomolecules using a haptic feedback device

Article

Abstract

Elastic network models of biomolecules have proved to be relatively good at predicting global conformational changes particularly in large systems. Software that facilitates rapid and intuitive exploration of conformational change in elastic network models of large biomolecules in response to externally applied forces would therefore be of considerable use, particularly if the forces mimic those that arise in the interaction with a functional ligand. We have developed software that enables a user to apply forces to individual atoms of an elastic network model of a biomolecule through a haptic feedback device or a mouse. With a haptic feedback device the user feels the response to the applied force whilst seeing the biomolecule deform on the screen. Prior to the interactive session normal mode analysis is performed, or pre-calculated normal mode eigenvalues and eigenvectors are loaded. For large molecules this allows the memory and number of calculations to be reduced by employing the idea of the important subspace, a relatively small space of the first M lowest frequency normal mode eigenvectors within which a large proportion of the total fluctuation occurs. Using this approach it was possible to study GroEL on a standard PC as even though only 2.3% of the total number of eigenvectors could be used, they accounted for 50% of the total fluctuation. User testing has shown that the haptic version allows for much more rapid and intuitive exploration of the molecule than the mouse version.

Keywords

Force feedback Protein flexibility Normal mode analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Tirion M (1996) Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 77:1905–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chacon P, Tama F, Wriggers W (2003) Mega-dalton biomolecular motion captured from electron microscopy reconstructions. J Mol Biol 326:485–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang Y, Rader AJ, Bahar I, Jernigan RL (2004) Global ribosome motions revealed with elastic network model. J Struct Biol 147:302–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bahar I, Rader AJ (2005) Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15:586–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lezon TR, Sali A, Bahar I (2009) Global motions of the nuclear pore complex: insights from elastic network models. PLoS Comput Biol 5Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atsushi M, Ishida H (2009) Global conformational changes of ribosome observed by normal mode fitting for 3D cryo-EM structures. Structure 17:1605–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bahar I, Lezon TR, Bakan A, Shrivastava IH (2009) Normal mode analysis of biomolecular structures: functional mechanisms of membrane proteins. Chem Rev 110:1605–1613Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tama F, Sanejouand Y-H (2001) Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. Prot Eng 14:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayward S (2004) Identification of specific interactions that drive ligand-induced closure in five enzymes with classic domain movements. J Mol Biol 339:1001–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ikeguchi M, Ueno J, Sato M, Kidera A (2005) Protein structural change upon ligand binding: linear response theory. Phys Rev Lett 94:078102-1-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hayward S, Kitao A (2006) Molecular dynamics simulations of NAD+-induced domain closure in horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase. Biophys J 91:1823–1831Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atilgan C, Atilgan AR (2009) Perturbation-response scanning reveals ligand entry-exit mechanisms of ferric binding protein. PLoS Comput Biol 5Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eyal E, Bahar I (2008) Toward a molecular understanding of the anisotropic response of proteins to external forces: insights from elastic network models. Biophys J 94:3424–3435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brooks FP, Ouh-Young M, Battert JJ, Kilpatrick PJ (1990) Project GROPE-haptic displays for scientific visualization. Comput Graph 24:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Comai S, Mazza D (2010) A haptic-based framework for chemistry education: experiencing molecular interactions with touch, technology enhanced learning. Quality of teaching and educational reform. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 338–344Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nagata H, Mizushima H, Tanaka H (2002) Concept and prototype of protein-ligand docking simulator with force feedback technology. Bioinformatics 18:140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sankaranarayanan G, Weghorst S, Sanner M, Gillet A, Olson A (2003) Role of haptics in teaching structural molecular biology. HAPTICS ’03, 363Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wollacott AM, Merz KM Jr. (2006) Haptic applications for molecular structure manipulation. J Mol Graph Model 25:801–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Subasi E, Basdogan C (2008) A new haptic interaction and visualization approach for rigid molecular docking in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 17:73–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stocks M, Hayward S, Laycock S (2009) Interacting with the biomolecular solvent accessible surface via a haptic feedback device. BMC Struct Biol 9:69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Daunay B, Régnier S (2009) Stable six degrees of freedom haptic feedback for flexible ligand-protein docking. Computer-Aided Design, pp 886–895Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stone J, Gullingsrud J, Grayson P, Schulten K (2001) A system for interactive molecular dynamics simulation. ACM Siggraph, pp 191–194Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bolopion A, Cagneau B, Redon S, Régnier S (2010) Comparing position and force control for interactive molecular simulators with haptic feedback. J Mol Graph Model 29(2):280–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rossi R, Isorce M, Morin S, Flocard J, Arumugan K, Crouzy S, Vivaudou M, Redon S (2007) Adaptive torsion-angle quasi-statics: a general simulation method with applications to protein structure analysis and design. Bioinformatics 23(13):408–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nishikawa T, Go N (1987) Normal modes of vibration in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor and its mechanical property. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2:308–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Go N (1990) A theorem on amplitudes of thermal atomic fluctuations in large molecules assuming specific conformations calculated by normal mode analysis. Biophys Chem 35:105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hayward S, Go N (1995) Collective variable description of native protein dynamics. Ann Rev Phys Chem 46:223–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kitao A, Hirata F, Go N (1991) The effects of solvent on the conformation and the collective motions of protein—normal mode analysis and molecular-dynamics simulations of melittin in water and in vacuum. Chem Phys 158:447–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    García AE (1992) Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins. Phys Rev Lett 68:2696–2699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC (1993) Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 17:412–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hayward S, Kitao A, Hirata F, Go N (1993) Effect of solvent on collective motions in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 234:1207–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kitao A, Go N (1999) Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space. Curr Opin Struct Biol 9:164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Atilgan AR, Durell SR, Jernigan RL, Demirel MC, Keskin O, Bahar I (2001) Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys J 80:505–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Erman B (1997) Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Folding Design 2:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Karsten S, Yves-Henri S (2004) ElNemo: a normal mode web server for protein movement analysis and the generation of templates for molecular replacement. Nucl Acids Res 32:W610–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Laycock SD, Stocks MB, Hayward S (2010) Navigation and exploration of large data-sets using a haptic feedback device. SIGGRAPH ’10: ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 PostersGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zilles CB, Salisbury JK (1995) A constraint based God-object method for haptic display. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 146–151Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computing SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations